As The Goal Posts In The Gay Rights Movement Get Pushed Farther Apart, The New York Times Outdoes Itself For Pure, Hateful Creepiness

Sun 12 Aug MMXII - Clk 2 Enlrg

In a sane society, the evil sinister-looking elites in the glass tower who gave the green light for this story to be  published on the front page of the Sunday Magazine of Amerika's newspaper of record would be rounded up and tried. And then, preferably, corralled into YKW ("You Know Where").

"What's So Bad About A Boy Who Wants To Wear A Dress?"

In There Are Any Lawyers Out There: Help
To ATtack The NYT For Pedophaelia For This
One - They Have Gone Too Far Here 

When I saw that the Times Sunday Mag chose to put this story on their front page today, I cringed, horrified. The reaction was  physical. After all it came only two days after the verminous reality contortionists of Forty-Second Street put the "Gay Couples Filling Cribs" story on their front page, the most-watched and most expensive publishing real estate on planet earth.

We are always suspicious of anything published in the pages of the New York Times, especially social-commentary features like the one depicted here. But in this case in particular, "What's So Bad" disgusted and horrified us more than usual. The same hatred of tradition and normality that animates the demonic diversity enforcers at the New York Times, you see, already exists in the BS-battered brains of many of their readers. When are they going to understand that they are channeling anger in the wrong direction?

In Other Words: the very same sense of indignation that the Times elite pretend to have towards such feel-good concepts as "white privilege" and "intolerance." very much exists among a much larger percentage of the still-majority population in the United States, and indeed of all of the West.

In a sane society, a people would be concerned about existential threats to their existence. Look at  what happened in the 1930s. Today though, nationalism and self-preservation of any sort whatsoever have been outlawed. Instead, in a sickening and suicidal twist, a nation's natural anger - the sort of anger that arises when hard to-pin-down threats to existential well being seem omnipresent - instead a nation's existential anger today is systematically and officially channelled into rebelling against such peeves as second-hand smoke, seatbelt laws, bogus claims of bullying, and the like.

In a sane society, population replacement would be at the top of the agenda on a list of a nation's pet peeves, but we all now know how far complaining about population substitution will get you today.

We digress, il y a de quoi as they say in our ancestral Gaul.

From "What's So Bad About A Boy Who Wants To Wear A Dress" : (btw: it's an Eight-page feature):

From the article :

Take a close look at the photo that the sick little eunuchs at the New York Times chose to publish in the Index part of the Sunday Mag :

It depicts what the sick liberals at Amerika's newspaper of record deem to be the Ultimate Height of Human Social Achievement: namely a white male (note the white hand, complete with mockumentary wedding ring) adjusting the dress - yes DRESS - of his negro "progeny"). (look closely at the poor child's profile)).

This is definitely one of the more disgusting New York Times pieces I have commented on to to date. Dissenters: They Are Winning! Turn up the heat on the enemies! 

The New York Times: Rabid, Phrenetic, Insane Anti-Euro Traditional Normality Since 1969