Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Libya, the Stone Ages, and You: As The Greatest Conspiracy the World Has Ever Seen (The Erasure of Past and Present Western Preeminence in the Minds of the Global Masses) Continues Apace, the New York Times Perpetuates the Myth of the Glorious Arab Spring

31 Agust MMXI - Clk 2 Enlrg 
I'm starting to miss the Colonel, I really am.

Like Saddam Hussein, at least Qaddafi knew that his nation was a Third World hellhole whose very existence was created, sustained by, and as a point of passage for the 85% of Africans who would emigrate from its shores if they could, mortally threatening to Europe.

When three years ago or so Qaddafi came out and offered Italy his help in  stopping the Libya-launched hordes of Erceti flooding in to the land of milk and honey in exchange for five billion dollars over five years, Berlu and his ilk should have leaped at the opportunity instead of excreting the usual platitudes about human rights, equal opportunity and universal egalitarianism.

Instead, we now have Lampedusa processing thousands of humanity's most depraved young fertile souls - all brought to you thanks to misguided White Western food aid to the Dark Continent over the past three decades.

I'm starting to miss the Colonel.

As the utterly backassward, stuck-in-the-Stone-Age tribes of that dismal turd world shithole that is Libya begin to awake to the reality that the so-called "Arab Spring" is not going to turn their women into Brittney Spears's and their cities into Palm Springs overnight, it's almost like you can hear the Colonel with his bad hair snickering at Western naiveté.

"Told you so!", says the Colonel.

Meanwhile, the New York Times and its snickering communist reality fugitives continue apace down the  brightly colored brick road of fantasy of universal outcomes. "All the noble people of Libya need," insist over and over the dark-souled diversity enforcers at Amerika's newspaper of record, "Is democracy, equality, diversity, and liberalism, and they will blossom into a beautiful society of incredible enlightenment and enrichment."

The worst part is, that the poor, not-too-bright camel herders of Libya itself, dressed in their god-awful gaudy Chinese-made t-shirts depicting American hip-hop "culture," were the first to be infected by this disease that is Western liberalism; in the same way that these Allahu-Akbar screaming throwbacks from another era have grown fond of electricity and telephones, they have also adopted our most noble notions of fairness that would have worked 200 years ago, in a homogeneous world, but have absolutely no place in their society in 2011.

They want Western "enlightenment," but they are saddled with the same historical and dare I say biological limitations that landed them where they are in the first place; worse still, they want to cherry pick the best of the West (cell phones, the wheel, modern hygiene, etc. ), benefiting from all the cozy, comfy things that cometh from the West, while at the same time remaining stubbornly cocooned in their commitment to a troglodytic, low-IQ child molester, Momo.

As a Westerner, the impulse is almost innate: Libya and the Arab world, very fucked up, therefore, very worthy of my pity.

Yes, yes and yes. But fifty years ago, NOT today, when the evil, One-World diversity enforcers at the New York Times and other elitist institutions of World Policy have blurred national boundaries to the point of non-existence, and human differences even more so.

The Libyans might be a sad lot; in a sane world they would merit our pity, and concern. But in this day and age, wherein they have swallowed the Western One-World cool aid into believing that the only reason theirs is a dusty, impoverished shithole is because of some absurd notion of historical European wickedness on the Dark  Continent or one of the other textbook memes of the global social justice playbook, I say that the time for pity is over.

Life is not fair. North Africa will never be New England, and will probably always need dictators like Qaddafi.

The New York Times is Guilty in perpetuating the myth that a democratic Arab Spring can happen without ghastly consequences for all of the region and indeed for all of the West - the very place that impregnated that Godforsaken land with such naive notions of universal fair play.

Once again, the New York Times: gravely fucking things up since 1946.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Subliminal Suggestion From the New York Times

29AugMMXI - Clk 2 Enlrg

The illustration used for the "Letters to the Editor" section on : "Those Who Serve" 

"The Nation's Cruelest Immigration Law"

From the article :

Funny how the eunuchs at the New York Times sneer on religion except when allegiance to it suits their purposes of demonizing certain groups.

Sunday, August 28, 2011

And Now, A Word From Winston (NOT NYT-Approved)

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of
slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome ."

Sir Winston Churchill; (Source: The River War, first edition, Vol II, pages 248-250 London).

Failing to Understand, Even Downright Downplaying Of Western Exceptionalism by the Eunuchs at Amerika's Newspaper of Record

28AugMMXI - Clk 2 Enlrg
"Does America Need Manufacturing?", by visiting Times communist Joe Gertner, is an entire feature article published in the Times Sunday Magazine today that blabbers on for three thousand words about electric cars and the emerging car battery industry in Michigan.

Nary a word on why Michigan - Detroit in particular - is a graveyard of once-mighty factories.

In this cafe-latte age of neutered eunuchs with fashionable eyewear and Facebook fancies of post-Industrial greatness, the New York Times once again shows its utter inability (refusal) to identify the true woes of an ailing civilization.

It is screamingly obvious that a more honest feature story on manufacturing in the US would have addressed the root causes behind why it is impossible today to buy a pair of scissors that weren't Made in China (and thus cheap, and disposable). Namely :

- suicidal marketplace liberalism ;

- monumental differences in group ability ;

- the supremacy of the unions ;

- most glaringly, the suicidal nature of egalitarian, One World thinking of the elites.

I was looking at a video shot in a Mercedes Benz factory. You can check it out below: 

Notice anything strange about the labor situation over there at Mercedes?

Now, in contrast with the Mercedes vid, watch the video below. It illustrates what is going on in what is left of the American auto industry. The person giving the tour is a Chrysler employee at the Detroit plant that makes Jeeps :

Now, in light of the way the US auto industry seems handicapped by certain workforce issues, the Times' skepticism about the future of American manufacturing seems almost justified. 

From the NYT article :

(to be continued...) ...

Saturday, August 27, 2011

Once Again, The NYT Champions the Most Verminous, The Most Wicked, and it Makes No Sense Whatsoever (from a Journalistic Point of View)

Why is the New York Times even publishing this story, so many years after the murder of a Long Island teenager first impregnated and then strangled by the curse of diversity imported from Britain no less three decades ago?

"A Teenage Killer, Now 51, Recounting His Crimes"

We know by now that the Times' ulterior motive in cases like this is ALWAYS the rehabilitation of the perp.

But in this instance something more subtle is going on. Could it be the killer's somewhat unique "Britishness" in this case? Certainly the circumstances - negro boyfriend impregnates then murders young white girl who'd finally awoken to the errors of her diversity experiment - was already grist for the mill  even back in the mid-1970s.

From the article :

The Murderer: 

The Victim : 

The true reason behind the Times' decision to publish this non-story ? 

The New York Times: Feeding The Tumors That Feed On Society Since 1966.

N.B.: You have to read the childlike letter to the parole board by the killer and the related article  published by the New York Times to fully grasp that the ONLY reason the Times is publishing this crap, is to ensure the parole of this murderous piece of shit. And read closely and you will see, that what the Times is really doing, is punishing the murdered girls' parents for forcing her to get an abortion after this mutation of nature impregnated her. They were not ready to accept their daughter being preggers with a quarter african child, and this is a cardinal sin of lily-white close-mindedness to the diversity enforcers at the New York Times. Make no mistake: with this disgusting series of articles, the Times is attacking the girl and her kin, and rallying the authorities on behalf of the killer, so that he might be paroled at his next hearing, in May 2012. Had the killer been white, the Times would never bother publishing three separate articles three and a half decades after the fact.

"An Inmate's Letter Recalls A Certain Summer" (The Times meant to say: "Verminous Half-Brit Quadroon Who Murdered White Girl After Impregnating Her, Begs Parole Board For Release From Scummer U., And We're Gonna Help")

"Letter From An Inmate" (The Times meant to say: "Verminous Half-Brit Quadroon Who Murdered White Girl After Impregnating Her, Shows Zero Remorse, Sneers At Society For Failing To See The Beauty And Enlightenment Of His Deed, Begs Parole Board For Release From Scummer-U.")

To The Point Of Appearing Disingenuousness and Condescending, The NYT Overdoes It Once Again in Their Breathless, Eternal Campaign of African Uplift

27 Aug MMXI - Clk to Enlarge
"Black South African Woman Goes From Never A Sip To Vineyard Fame" by Times communist Barry Bearak* and published on the front page of Amerika's newspaper of record today, is a love-fest of South African negro worship that takes hypocrisy and gushing to new levels of sick. Even by New York Times standards.

(*Barry Bearak and his wife Celia Dugger, became New York Times bureau chiefs in Johannesburg SA in 2008.) 

Who's falling for this shit anymore? 

Answer: nobody. 

From the article : 

Umm, Barry, I think the word is "BEE,"actually.  

Oh, I see. Thank you for clarifying that. 

Translation : Black South Africans are oppressed therefore poor, and not the other way around. Since they are "real" Africans, they drink beer - the true libation of a true, noble people who have none of the snooty proclivities of stuck-up, evil Euros. 

And you ignorant racists thought only white chicks could have freckles. Another scientific observation to drive home the underlying reality: race is a social construct. 

Translation : Africans are far too noble to think of a beverage in simple terms of pleasure, and too busy to be talking nonsense about bouquet and what have you. What does wine have to do with the price of rice in China? THAT is how an african thinks. Noble to the core. 

 Like a sassy school girl pulling an inside joke on her school marm, the Times' beloved wine-making miracle woman has a laugh at her clueless Euro friends' expense. 

Lest Times readers never forget for even one second the troubles from whence this poor, noble soul did come! 

Zulu Wine-Maker Ntsiki Biyela:  NYT - Super-Approved√

Friday, August 26, 2011

Failing to Comprehend And Making Excuses For The Utter Uselessness of the Turd World

26AugMMXI - Clk 2 Enrage
I was surprised to read yesterday in the pages of the New York Times, a bit of historical truth that if I weren't so hungover right now I would link directly to :

It seems that sad-sack Libya, the "country," up until the discovery of oil that made it wealthy (by the west and for the West)  in 1959, had absolutely zero raison d'être économique, apart from selling scrap steel left over from the allied and axis war efforts in north african.

Yes, you read it right, you read it here first: up until 1959, the entire economy of Libya was based on upon scrapping the leftover war machinery of the West.

As if the monstrous inconsequentiality of that shithole nation were not enough to behold from this sad-sack historical fact, we have the eunuchs at the New York Times trying to make us believe in some kind of glorious "Arab Spring" happening in the Maghreb as we speak, as if this Godforsaken anus of the Dark Continent held in its  bosom some kind of awesome civilizational spark plug, which would justify the billion-dollar NATO air campaign to rid Libya of Qadaffi, an eccentric if otherwise reasonable leader.

I for one remember Qaddafi warning in no uncertain terms, the Western world what would happen if his beachhead were compromised, and the billion-strong impoverished erecti of Sub-Saharan Africa made a run on lush and week Europe.

Kind of wishing Qaddafi were still around now, aren't we, Italy ?

Make no mistake: (have you seen the pics of the place, for Chrissakes?!) : Libya was and always will be a backasswards, Stone-Age shit-pit of "human" underachievement, a fucked-up land halfway between the Land Where They Never Invented the Wheel, and the Wheel of Fortune. (The EBT Card Wheel of Welfare-State Europe Fortune, that is).

Were it not for Western thirst for oil, the camel-jockeys of Libya would have been relegated to History's one-story cinder-block storage rooms long ago.

Libya is fifteen thousand years behind the West: it is evident from any and every angle of perception.

You heard it right here first: the Bedouins of Libya, that land of bad-hair dictators with the occasional muster to snub their noses at the West (and bring down a jumbo jet over Scotland), are stuck in the Stone Age, despite the diseased and deranged willingness of the West to use a forceps to pull them out arse-first.

Thursday, August 25, 2011


Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Failing to Comprehend The Third World Invader Entitlement Mindset Behind the Strauss-Kahn Imbroglio

24 Aug MMXI - Clk 2 Enlrg
Consider this excerpt from yet another NYT article on the Strauss-Kahn affair, entitled "Strauss-Kahn Drama Ends With Short Final Scene," published above the fold on the front page of today's national edition :

Here we have a clear-cut example of the way this (formerly) dirt poor, alas primitive African woman thinks: in an extremely unsophisticated, even childlike manner, wherein she sincerely believes that the professional, intellectual class (the professionals of the Manhattan District Attorney's Office) of the host country that laid out the red carpet for her so that she could escape the Stone Age savagery of her native Guinea Africa, would be so stupid as to not notice an obvious, easily verifiable discrepancy in her rape-victim account. Like millions who resemble her, Miss Diallou is too stupid to understand that her own stupidity does not disappear just because Western benevolence puts her in protected species class.

It's like a child pulling the wool over the eyes of a loving yet gullible grandmother, who refuses to see the receding level of the cookie jar.

In the sickness behind Miss Diallou's own case of stealing the cookies while grandma is watching, we find the population replacement traitors at USA Asylum Resettlement Services who convinced this poor, mud-hutt African Erectus that Amurika is the land of milk and honey, that partaking in its riches is her human right, that her every wish here will become reality because the West is responsible for her and all African failure (colonialism, white privilege, etc etc), and that no matter what, she is a member of such a protected, untouchable species, that the mere mention of  the slightest victimhood - real or imagined - is always  enough to make these evil white people stand down, and align with the bigger, pre-ordained racial justice order of the universe.

Why hasn't the New York Times - or indeed the entire Western MSM - even mentioned this poor woman's obvious cognitive shortcomings, as a valid factor in explaining the whole "misunderstanding"?

A simple Google search of "average IQ Guinea" will take you to the one and only one site that talks honestly about variances in cognitive ability by country, namely the wiki entry on Richard Lynn and Tatu VanHanen's "highly controversial"  2006 book "IQ and Global Inequality". (Van Hanen's son used to be prime minister of Finland - how cool is that?).

It turns out that -  according to Lynn and VanHanen - the Strauss-Kahn maid-whore asylum cheat hails from a land where the national IQ in 2006 was 67, two levels above Haiti, sure, but 3 points below official mental retardation threshold as per 1950s American Psychiatry Association standards. (In 2002 for some reason Guinea's national IQ was down to 63 - equal with Haiti's that year) (Progress!)

So there we have it: a once-grand civilization eating itself alive from within, by inviting the worst kind of parasites from the most backward, primitive places on earth, who are before debarkation endowed with an even bigger, even more unnatural sense of self-worth and entitlement by their marxist population-replacement handlers. It leads to situations like Strauss Kahn. It's as sad and as simple as that.

Another thing: has ANYONE read ANYWHERE of ANY newspaper demanding that this disgusting rape-screaming asylum cheat (A) Be Deported?; (B) Be Tried for false testimony?

Of course not, à la Crystal Mangum (Duke Lacrosse Accuser, since charged with manslaughter), we know now that certain species can never be held accountable. THAT would interfere with a most perverse form of universal global social justice, that seems to be the purview of the diseased eunuchs at the New York Times.

Reminder! Beat the Times Paywall (It's Incredibly Easy)

Just delete the part of the URL that starts with the question mark (usually right after "HTML") then hit enter, like so :

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Thank You New York Times: My Cup Runneth Over With An Abundance of African American Uplift / Evil White Racism Snivel To Report On

I was going to comment today first and foremost on yet another front page Times article featuring the white teenager in Mississippi who ran over a black dude with his F250, making it a Hate Crime of capital importance and a good excuse to break out the balloons and the party hats for the One World diversity freaks at Amerika's newspaper of record.

As the Mahogany Mob epidemic sweeps the nation to the point that Drudge is reporting it on a near-daily basis, and even CNN is calling it "entrepreneurial," the big brains at the Gray Lady feel the need to give front page coverage to a traffic accident.

Nevertheless, as much as I wanted to talk about "Weighing Race and Hate in a Mississippi Killing" in first place today, another bout of Times  asymmetrical reporting caught my attention, namely : "Preaching a Healthy Diet in the Deep-Fried Delta."

It's a non-story about a black preacher in Mississippi with a tiny congregation of overweight African Americans who is leading his rather bovine flock to SWPL-style enlightenment by getting them to eat less disgustingly.

Now, when I first saw this article in print (announced on the Times' front page, no less!), I thought to myself, "I know the Times is desperate for a steady supply of black stories to satisfy their Negro Uplift Quota (NUQ), but this story seems so incredibly inconsequential, something just doesn't seem right."

Imagine a story about a bunch of white nuns getting their first graders to read more, or to eat their vegetables: exactly, it doesn't land on the front page of the nation's newspaper of record.

Two days after the Harvard-educated Mississippi preacher (the word "Harvard" is mentioned only once in the entire 2-page article, the fact that the Times didn't dwell on Mister Preacher Man's Ivy League bona fides means what is obvious, wink wink), I came across this video on the same story (black preacher breaks the mould, gets his parishioners to stop eating fried muck) :

After looking at this vid, I couldn't help but wonder what the editorial meeting in the conference room at the New York Times must have been like. No doubt there were a few veteran Times-types who objected to such a thin story being published in the first place, especially on the front page; there was probably the article's author, Campbell Robertson - an effeminate, skinny white guy with fashionable eyewear - who was probably on the verge of tears when the higher-ups suggested that such a story was not even fit for the features section of a Rust Belt highschool yearbook. As the story was about to get axed, some token black woman no doubt at the conference table (probably wearing fashionable eyewear also, rectangular, and bright cherry red... ) chimed in about how obesity among the African population was such a crime, the whole Michelle Let's Move campaign, southern blacks being under- or negatively reported in the media, blah blah barf spew gag etc.

So the incredibly inane decision to publish this non-story was made, on the 52nd floor of what used to be the most influential newspaper in the world.

And they wonder  why they are losing readers.

A Harvard-Educated Preacher At the Pulpit Looks Over His Congregation of Obese Single Mothers on Welfare With Their Future Prison Population Spawn in What The DWLs at The New York Times Condescendingly Call the "Ministry of Health".
Most Def 100% NYT-Approved.  
But back to the racist killing in Mississippi story:

From the article :

Now, wouldn't you think that a more mature, less hateful, more responsible newspaper would spend a little less time demonizing an 18 year-old kid, even one who is accused of committing a horrible crime?

It's like the Times' hatred of white people burns like blinding rage in their unseeing eyes; even the blacks they worship and spend every other word idolizing would take a step back and say: "Take it easy brother, he was just a keed, he made a mistake. We must forgive even the evil crackers amongst us, when dey be young and sheet, coz dey still be hope to refawm dey hades, nomsane?"

But no, the Times has a harder and harder time concealing their contempt for the things that really get under their think, diseased skin, namely: merit, achievement, intelligence, history, civilization - Western in particular.

And their hatred for whites is equalled only by their love-affair with minorities, African Americans in particular :

Notice the way the Times mixes breathless adulation - tho somewhat understandable in the wake of a death and all (but not to these levels of hagiography) - with the rather inconvenient facts about the good Mr. Anderson's dubious activities on his final night before being made good: stuck without keys in a motel parking lot at 5am - ahem !  - while his "partner" (NYT-speak for good ole' fashion Southern Butt Buddy), which the Times goes to ridiculous lengths to legitimize by reporting on the happy couple's "child" they were raising together (barf), has no idea why he was there.

Oh well. I guess we shouldn't complain. After all, the New York Times is Amerika's newspaper of record. A veritable institution, filled with really smart people, not all of whom (but most) wear glasses.

Below is a perfect example of how we KNOW we can trust the NYT to deliver the most accurate news out there :

Ahhhhh. Thank goodness for that !

The New York Times:  Correcting Society Into Their Worldview, and NOT Reporting The News Since 1964.

Monday, August 22, 2011

The New York Times Pushes to Africanize Britain At Any Cost

22 Aug MMXI - Clk 2 Enlrg
"In Father's Memory, Fighting to Stay in Britain"

From the article :

He Believes This Because the NYT Has Convinced Him So. 

Part of the Problem? Original Caption Reads: 
Catherine Beaumont, a mother of two, took Antonio in. "She came and said, 'We love you and we want you to come and live with us,'" said Antonio, an apprentice electrician.

A Marriage Made in Heaven For the Diseased Minds at the New York Times. Note the Butcher Knife. 

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Freak Show Madness That Barely Conceals the Times' Disdain For Western Civilization

21AugMMXI - Clk 2 Enlrg
What is wrong with the weasily little eunuchs at the New York Times? These people are either sick, hateful, suicidal, or all three.

My disgust for Amerika's newspaper of record grows with each snivellous article I force myself to read (so you don't have to). (You're welcome).

As the West heads lemming-like to the precipice, like a sadistic grim reaper, the Times does what it can to expedite the collective demise of the greatest civilization since the Romans.

In today's Times (Sunday), I spotted no fewer than THREE articles pretending to extoll the virtuousness and beauty of individuals who are so sick and twisted in their polluted, diseased minds ( influenced as they are by NYT/Oprah-like mass brainwashing), that they think it's OK to pay a surgeon to cut their shmetzels off and inject their bodies with silicone.

And the New York Times claims that this is not only the height of mental healthfulness, it is also the sign of a truly free and enlightened society.

The first article that made me want to spew was published on page A18 of the New York section of today's national edition, and entitled "The High Price of Looking Like A Woman." It's the story of an Ecuadorean immigrant - probably illegal - who lives in public housing in New York City and who in addition to being on welfare probably pursues its self-mutilation campaign at taxpayer expense, too. The Times depicts this sickening creature as something that is worthy of limitless pity, because after 20 years of getting itself shot up with silicon in illegal clinics, "Zaira" is all misshapen now, with the silicon clumping and getting infected all over its artificially ample rump. A disgusting, pitiful South American invader whose only real claim to pity should come from the fact that had it stayed down there in the Turd World, the notion of self-mutilating itself into a "woman" might not have occurred to it. Such concepts seem to be unique to the liberal, self-destructing West, where we have an entire generation of fools who have been suckered into thinking that behaving like diseased degenerates is the height of human achievement.

It is true that I hold equal degrees of disgust and pity for people whose station in life is not so much a result of self-will, but rather mindless allegiance to conformity, as defined by the elites who push for butt-buddy marriage and wholesale population replacement, and who claim that 1950s America was the most backwards, stultified place in the history of humanity.

Why does the Times dwell on the sickest, most disgusting and degenerate elements of society, and place them on such a pedestal, as though they were an example for all to emulate?

Different people have different answers to this question. What is universal, however, is how incredibly wrong, and destructive, and sick this New Age progressivism is; it needs to be exposed; it needs to be stamped out.

"Zaira", the Ecuadorean Freak Show: NYT-Approved√

As if this first state-sponsored chicks with dicks story wasn't enough to prove the Times' New-Age bona fides, they had to publish another, equally stomach-turning sex-change surgery piece in their Sunday Styles section, "My Husband Is Now My Wife." As I read this piece I became increasingly queasy and sick to my stomach, as though the woman narrator (it's her husband who decided to have his pecker snipped off) of this piece was an ambassador for all feminism run amok, with a pair of sharp scissors in one hand and the complete works of Susan Sontag in the other.

This is what the Times wants: for all men to be eunuchs like them, literally, drained of their testosterone and defanged of their favorite organ.

I could not help thinking after reading this passage from the article :

...that the freshly-neutered eunuch, bandaged and bleeding in the car after the ride home from the sex-change surgery at the hospital, is a kind of stand-in for the neutered West after the radical feministas have gotten through with it.

The New York Times: Wishing We Were All Black, Brown, Gay or Dead Since 2001

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

And Now For Something Completely Different

Watch on full screen this incredible documentary by France3 tv on oil production in the Niger Delta:

Le sang de Nigéria | The blood of Nigeria by TheKantutaTV

You're welcome !

As the 10th Anniversary of Our Awakening to the True Face of the Religion of Peace Looms, the New York Times Softens up the Sheeple With Another Xenophilic Propaganda Puff Piece

Published on page A12 of the National section of today's Times, "Good Will To All, With A Side of Soft-Serve" is a breathless, snivelling love-fest of a pro-paki propaganda puff piece, featuring a Muslim Dairy Queen owner in Pennsylvania for whom the diversity enforcers at the New York Times spare no amount of love or worship. For Times communist Dan Barry, there is no question: swarthy Karachi  Muslim = good, hard-working, noble and and enlightened; pasty-faced locals = stupid, quaint, evil, and so 1990s. You have to read this shit to believe it: it's like the hateful population replacement advocates at the Times know that the tide is starting to turn, and that the locals are starting to wake up to their own engineered dispossession, despite the daily, relentless efforts by Western media elites to steer their sentiments elsewhere. As a result, the Times has to dial up the propaganda a notch or twelve. 

The eunuchs at the Times need to be stopped. This "love-thine-other & hate-thineself" is so incredibly evil and destructive, it needs to be exposed and fought from within. Blogs like this one are on the front lines of that battle, and need to be supported fiercely.

As if this sickening "Good Will" puff piece isn't bad enough by itself, it gets worse!

How? you ask, Is that possible?

Well, on the page opposite this article (page A13), the Times fiendishly published an article about Tuscon shooter Jared Loughner right above an equally critical article on Florida governor Rick Scott. Here's where it gets truly sickening: a quick glance at the photos on page A13, reveals that the bald Loughner could almost be mistaken for the bald Gov. Scott at the podium in the photo below: exactly the effect that the Times was shooting for with this sneaky photo choice.

"Lawyers for Defendant in Giffords Shooting Seem to Be Searching for Illness"

"Facing Flurry of Lawsuits, A Governor Loses a Round"

The disgusting vermin at the Times even go so far as to use an ice cream-friendly term - "Flurry" - in the title of the article about Rick Scott, to further befuddle an otherwise confused and gob-smacked readership.

The message could not be more clear : swarthy, hirsute Muslims imported from the other side of the planet = good and wholesome; indigenous euro-Americans with a paucity of follicular endowment = sinister, evil, inhumane, uncaring.

Think I'm making this shit up? Think I'm being paranoid?

Think again: Consider for yourself the photos that the Times published to do their subliminal dirty work :

Your Friendly Neighborhood Muslim Ice-cream Man - NYT - Approved√

About As Unfriendly As You Can Get

Florida Governor Rick Scott, in a Photo Cynically And Sadistically Published By the NYT On Purpose On the Same Page As and Right Below a Very Similar Photo Of Tucson Shooter Jared Loughner - the Two Cold Almost Be Confused As the Same Person, And This Is 100% Intentional

And it gets worse still !

Of the hundred and fifty or so comments on this article, every single one sounds like this:

After reading about a hundred gushing feedback comments like this one, I realized that something sinister was up. The group-think was too unanimous to be real.

And then I cam across the comment below. Note the name of the author* (and the author's home state).

I'm pretty sure the New York Times is planting their own comments now.

*As in, "Decline of the West" Oswald, anyone?

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Wednesday 17 August 2011

16 Aug. 2011 - Clik 2 Enlrg

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Summer Camp for Jews of Color : Is There No Place to Escape the Madness?

"Prayer, and Bug Juice, at a Summer Camp for Jews of Color"

This story almost needs no commentary....

London Riots: The New York Times Channels the Schadenfreude of the Third World, Which Wrongly Equates Last Week's Looting And Barbarity With Britishness

13AugMMXI - Clk 2 Enlrg
"For Egyptians, Riots in BRitain Offer a Chance to Scold the West"

Funny to see Egypt's Western-influenced elites thinking in perfect conformity with their devious puppet masters in the West.

I hate to break it to these poor Egyptians, but their glee is premature and based upon a misconception, one fostered in large part by the treasonous reality contortionists at mainstream newspapers like the New York Times: as much as they would like to think that the British are behaving even worse than the region-wide agitators of the Arab Spring, the fact is that the London riots are tainted to the core with Third World DNA.

This is not Britain behaving like North Africans; this is African invaders to Britain behaving as they would in the motherland, with the occasional native Brit or cockney wigger getting caught up in the frenzy.

It is amazing to see how the propaganda spewed forth from the Western liberal establishment spreads and poisons the minds of the less cognitively dexterious in the four corners of the world. How else would the good practitioners of the religion of peace in Cairo come to assume that Egypt and Britain are now equal civilizations? How else would they be blind to the multi-culturalist nature of the riots?

Answer: the Western media portrays it so.

From the article (gross-out warning)  :

From the article, the Times actually seems to be endorsing the views of the Hitler of Iran, anus-eyes Ahminthemoodforjihad :