 |
| Mon22OctMMxii - Clk2Enlrg |
Building Seven was named "building seven" and took about seven seconds to collapse; Lance Armstrong won the Tour seven times. Coincidence, or sinister conspiracy in plain sight?
Whatever really happened in either case, I am prone to automatically take the side of anyone or anything relentlessly pilloried by the verminous reality reversers at the New York Times. In the case of Armstrong, they have been publishing front page articles on the guy for the past two weeks that make him look thoroughly dishonest. Again, whether this is actually the case I do not know. I only know that the disgusting weasels at Amerika's newspaper of record are a degenerate cabal of lying leftists, and that their hatred for certain groups (ahem) is absolute, and in practically direct proportion to their zeal in uplifting other groups.
"Lance Armstrong Is Stripped Of His Seven Tour de France Titles"
From the article :
The New York Times: Comforting The Afflicted And Afflicting The Comfortable To The Point That The Afflicted Are Now Comfortable And Vice-Versa
3 comments:
Well, it is pretty much a fact that anyone in a fitness magazine or playing pro sports is on something illegal. He's still a very hard worker with great genes, that hasn't changed.
It is safe to attack Armstrong; he is a white male straight hero. Look at the media and their cheerleading of Michael Vick, magical negro.
RG III is the most exciting Quarterback around and praised for this.
Tim Tebow was the most exciting Quarterback last year because Denver were not very good so Tebow got bashed in the press for his shortcomings. While Griffin may be a better QB "magically" nobody is looking for his shortcomings.
Of course when Cam Newton is not being praised to the rooftops this is because of Ray Cism.
Why Armstrong?
Why not Roger Clemens?
Post a Comment