Why Has the New York Times Gone From Reporting the News to Promoting Global Race-Based "Social Justice" ?

3/8/11 - Click to Enlarge

If it is not becoming obvious to you, then you are either not paying close enough attention, or you have succumbed to the same forces that have transformed Amerika's newspaper of record from a hard-driving journal of smart realistic reporting into a drivelsome rag of wishful-thinking NWO do-gooder propaganda.

The New York Times has totally abandoned its mission to report the news both domestic and international with standards of journalistic impartiality that were established centuries ago, rooted as they once were in that most magnificent period of human achievement, the European Enlightenment.

Instead, in every arena imaginable, the crypto-delusional reality contortionist fanatics at the New York Times use the considerable breadth of their podium to vehicle their obsessional commitment to a race-tinted One-World global social justice agenda.

We have seen clear evidence of this shift in the Times' focus since Day One of the Arab World Revolts, which arguably were triggered in part by the type of liberal egalitarian propaganda that the NYT has been hell-bent on disseminating for over a decade now. (Please see: "Gray Lady Down," by former Times reporter William McGowan). These poor, rather dim-witted Arabian North Africans, having heard through the grapevine that they are JUST as smart as Europeans, JUST as worthy of "democracy" as Europeans, JUST as capable of creating European-style civilizations, used such bibles of Western liberal egalitarianism orthodoxy as the NYT to justify their pursuit of becoming Europe overnight.

How can we blame them? That most authoritative spokesmouth for all things Western - the New York Times - has been telling these people, if indirectly, for years now that the only reason they are living in Turd World poverty and despondency, is NOT because of their national innate ability (as this guy courageously does), but rather - all people and all civilizations being equal, but all political regimes NOT SO MUCH - but rather BECAUSE they were the victims of an unfair undemocratic regime, which to boot is basically in power because of evil white people (the United States).

Oy! Is there no end to this madness? How can the NYT continue to spew their anti-Western, self-loathing propaganda on a daily basis? And continue to get away with it?

There should be one thousand "crimesofthetimes.com" - hell, there should be a million COTTs! One timeswatch.org (go there!) for every single New York Times paying subscribers.

Methinks that they at the NTY are in their End Game, and methinks that the demise of the New York Times - in its current incarnation, anyway - is a good thing for Western Civilization.

Please excuse for we digress: the whole point of this post is an article we spotted in today's "Dining and Wine" section of all places, that exactly illustrates the New York Times' determination to create a society where race, gender, history, national boundaries, etc. are all obliterated in a giant Blender of One World Harmony.

The offending article in question, entitled "United At Tables in Harlem," is supposed to be about food and dining (it's published in the Food and Wine section, for Chrissakes), but the fiendish communists at the Times seem to have no bones revealing that they are in fact using a supposedly foodie article about a new restaurant as an excuse to further their twisted vision of one-world social justice. Apparently for the increasingly desperate elitists at Amerika's newspaper of record, promoting race-based and sex-based social justice is  more important than sticking to the simple, the factual, and the empirical.

From the article:

"THERE were four elderly black women in hats at Red Rooster Harlem the other night, across the aisle from a group of white men who had come north to 125th Street by subway. Also present were a mixed-race family sharing apple pie, a stroller beside them; an Asian same-sex couple, drinking wine; and mixed-gender black couples eating Swedish meatballs. Above them all was a Philip Maysles painting depicting the artist Norman Rockwell staring into a mirror and painting a portrait of himself — as Ruby Bridges, the African-American girl who integrated an all-white elementary school in New Orleans in 1960."

And it gets worse!! The author of this population-replacement one-world harmony schmooze of a post-Western propaganda puff-piece actually admits that this is not about food at all, this is about the Times' vision for utopia:

"The racial and ethnic variety in the vast bar and loft-like dining room are virtually unrivaled. The restaurant may not be the best to open in New York City this year (though the food is good). But it will surely be counted as among the most important. It is that rarest of cultural enterprises, one that supports not just the idea or promise of diversity, but diversity itself."

So, for the enlightened New-Age idiot elitists at the New York Times, it doesn't matter if the restaurant sucks, for virtually nothing is as pure, and as beautiful, and as progressive, and as worthy of praise as a Harlem eatery where one can find "mixed-gender black couple[s] eating Swedish meatballs."

And. It. Gets. Worse: For the truly, truly enlightened, sitting next to those meatballs, there needs to be:

"A mixed-race family sharing apple pie, a stroller beside them." 

 


The New York Times:  Population Replacement Enthusiasts Since the Early Eighties

More Third World Dystopia In Pictures on the Front Page of the New York Times

3/8/11 - Click to Enlarge 

The pointy-headed, bespectacled elitists at Amerika's newspaper of record can not get enough of the protests that are rocking the Arab Thurd WOrld. For the reality fugitives at the Times, these uprisings are Mai Soixante Huit with a perfect and timely blending of post 9-11 patent-pending NYT globalist social justice juicer juice.

The New York Ties has been publishing photos of the Arab world in revolt on the front page EVERY DAY for close to to months now.

Why are the elitists at the NYT so in love with the Islamic Third World?

Questions for Punjabi-Sikh Governor Nikki Haley of South Carolina: The NYT, in Love With Non-Westerners, Expresses Its Hatred for Indigenous Euro-Americans With Shocking Bluntness

3/6/11 - Click to Enlarge

We are reprinting here for you this most loathsome interview of the new Indian governor of South Carolina, Nikki Haley, by Sunday Times Magazine communist Andrew Goldman. We will comment on this sick elitist's self-hatred shortly, but in the meantime Goldman illustrates quite clearly the exact type of pathology that defines ethnomasochistic political correctness: "Third World, good; Western World, bad bad bad." Read it yourself, then tell me I am making this shit up: 

Why on earth did your parents — wealthy Sikh immigrants from Punjab, one with a law degree, the other with a P.H.D - settle in Bamberg, S.C., a town with one traffic light and 2.500 people, none of whom were Indians? 

They came to the U.S. to tour for a year. Right before they went back, someone said, “You can’t leave; this is the best country,” and they said, “We don’t have jobs.” And by chance, my mom was offered a job to teach sixth-grade social studies, and my dad was offered one to become a professor. It happened to be in Bamberg, so that’s where they stayed.

The story about your parents’ entering you in the Little Miss Bamberg pageant has become part of your lore. Let me get it straight: 5-year-old you and your older sister are entered into a pageant in which they historically crowned one white winner and one black winner, but because you were neither, they disqualified you. 
Right after I got through singing “This Land Is Your Land,” the judges called my parents to the back and said, “If we put them in one category, then one group will be mad, and if we put them in the other category, the other group will be mad.” They basically disqualified me and gave me a beach ball and sent me on my way.

I would have burned that town down, like in “Carrie.” 
I know that to people outside the state, it sounds like something that’s really terrible. But what I want people to understand is that Bamberg is the same small town that stopped segregating the princesses after that, that took black girls and white girls in the Girl Scoutsand that allowed me on the tennis team. I wanted the takeaway not to be that I was disqualified from the pageant but what the town did after the pageant.

When you married your husband, you converted to Christianity. Did it break your parents’ hearts? 
We don’t talk much about it, but they have been very respectful. When I was growing up, they always said, “There’s many ways of getting to God, and the important thing is that you have God in your life.”

During the campaign, two men claimed that you had affairs with them. You said that it “reeks of everything that’s wrong with the establishment.” Explain. 
The first public poll showing that we had a double-digit lead had appeared, and there was no way my opponents were going to let that sit. Sure enough, within a week this rumor came out. What they don’t understand is all they did was motivate me more.

One of the guys who stepped forward is now peddling a memoir. 
Attention and money all come into play. I don’t plan on reading it. I don’t have time to read fiction.

Let’s talk about your position in the Republican Party. A week before the general election, nearly half of the state’s G.O.P. lawmakers said they were going to vote for your Democratic opponent. 
My colleagues know that I call them out whenever they do something wrong. They don’t like that. I believe legislatures should have to vote on the record. I believe they should have to disclose their income and show all their spending online.

You don’t think it’s just a question of their preferring any white guy over a brown woman? 
It’s probably a combination of a lot of things. To be honest, I don’t care if they like me or not. What I care about is that they respect me.

In December your spokesman said that you couldn’t meet with Sarah Palin, who campaigned for you, because of your son’s basketball practice. I thought, A practice? I could barely get my folks to show up to games. 
We never miss his practices. If you know how much he loves basketball, it’s a big deal.

You’re said to be incredibly competitive. Outside politics, how does this manifest itself? 
Ask my kids. When we have basketball tournaments, I am the basketball queen. When we play the Wii, I am the bowling queen. And I will forever say that I am the Putt-Putt queen.

How do you react when you lose? 
I don’t lose, so I don’t have to worry about that.

She May Be Okay, But We're Sorry: The Way the NYT
Obsesses Over Foreign-Born Luminaries is Just Too Much.
Witness the Way They Treat Bobby Jindal, the Anchor-Baby Offspring
of Indian Elitists: When Jindal Gave the Republican Rebuttal
to Obama's Very First State of the Union Address,
This Was The Takeaway Message : "Hey Third Worlders: It's
Official! Minorities Are in Charge!"
Enough of This Minority Worship for Goodness Sakes. What Will It
Take To Make Diversity-Enforcers STFU? As It Is Non-Whites Are 92%
Of Global Population. WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO MAKE THEM STFU? 

Once Again, The NYT Blames Bad Third World Behaviour on Western Civilization

3/5/11 - Sorry, No NYT Front
Page Available

Please read "The Hidden Victims of Wartime Rape" by contributing Times communist Lara Stemple (if you Google her, you'll see what she is all about).

This op-ed piece, which appeared two days ago in the "Opinion" section of Amerika's newspaper of record, makes it pretty clear where the reality fugitives at Amerika's newspaper of record stand on gender equality and Turd World Primitivism.

From the article :

"...Silence about male victims reinforces unhealthy expectations about men and their supposed invulnerability. Such hyper-masculine ideals encourage aggressive behavior in men that is dangerous for the women and girls with whom they share their lives."

So we have gender/diversity-enforcer New York Times elitists, using the Stone-Ager practitioners of the rape that is ô-so-prevalent in that most wonderfully diverse continent of Africa, teaching us a lesson that :

A) All rapists are equal; B) All rape victims are equal; C) Male and female are subject to rape at equal rates; D) "Entrenched ideas" of manhood are partly to blame for the way that rape is committed and perceived, especially in Africa.

From the article:

"The American government should expand its efforts to include the many international programs working with men and boys to challenge entrenched ideas about manhood and to stop the cycle of violence."

So what we have here, are vicious (Western-created) stereotypes about "manhood," that are the root cause behind this Stone-Age behaviour by these permanently tumescent African males, who rape and pillage at will, not because it is in their nature, but rather because the West is so irresponsible, that we have created the background that results in this type of savagery.

The New York Times: it's getting stupider and more anti-Western by the day, but There Is No Stopping It.

Jihad in Frankfurt : The One-World Islamic Apologist Commies at the New York Times Mention the "Allah Akbar" Part Only in the Very Last Paragraph

 

3/3/11 - Click to Enlarge

An article entitled "Gunman Kills 2 U.S. Airmen In Attack at German Airport*," by Times' communists Jack Ewing and Elisabeth Bumiller, was published today on page A4 of the international section of Amerika's newspaper of record.

[*Note: In the online version, the article is now entitled "Shooting at Germany Airport Kills 2 U.S. Airmen." It's almost like the NYT publishes suggestively and in haste in their print edition, and then tries to make up for the zeal with which they pursue their sinister agenda by toning it down in the online edition. After all, a "Shooting at Germany Airport" almost sounds like it could be a simple mishap; whereas a title like "Gunman Kills 2 U.S. Airmen..." makes it a lot more likely that readers will suspect that terrorism - and angry young Muslim men - were involved.]

The fact that the Times would give such prominence - an "Inside the Times" summary at the bottom of the front page fold, and a top-of-the fold feature position in the 1st page of the International Section - to the story of the murder of U.S. soldiers on their way to Afghanistan by what almost anyone even reasonably informed would surmise was a "Muslim-German," is interesting and needs to be dissected.

Jihad in Frankfurt, Presented on an Equal Footing With
European War Crimes in Afghanistan

First of all, we noticed that the "Gunman kills 2 U.S. Airmen" story (hint: the "Gunman" was not a female Japanese exchange student) was published directly above a large article headlined as: "Nato Helicopters Kill Nine Afghan Boys Collecting Firewood for Their Families." [Again, the online version of this article is entitled: "Nine Afghan Boys Killed by Nato Helicopters." Spot the error).

Secondly, it needs to be mentioned that the New York Times in this 19-paragraph "Gunman Kills 2" article (we counted), waited until the very last paragraph to report this:

"A man whose office is near the site of the shooting, speaking on the condition of anonymity to protect his business, said witnesses told him that the gunman shouted “God is great” in Arabic before firing. Mr. Füllhardt, the police official, said he could not confirm such reports."

In a sane society, would not the motive of the killer be first and foremost what an honest newspaper would report on?

Obviously not for the dhimmis at the New York Times.

It's almost like, the only reason they reported on this story at all, is that they knew that other news organizations - including Der Spiegel (read D.S.'s fascinating take on the "Radical Islamist Roots of the Frankfurt Attack")  - were writing about it, and that if they didn't (they would of course have preferred not to), then it would be so obvious whose side they were really playing for.

Of course, in order to atone for the sin of speaking even circumspectly about the truth of Islamic fanaticism in Europe by that continent's wonderful immigrant community, the New York Times chooses to publish a story that makes NATO chopper pilots sound like baby killers.

Oh well.

The New York Times: Really pissing me off since 1995.

The NYT Clears Up The Confusion Over the Wisconsin Protests

3/1/11 - Click to Enlarge

I have to admit that I wasn't really keeping up with what was going on in Wisconsin - though it has been all over the news - until I read a front page New York Times piece by Dan Barry entitled "Thank You For Your Support. Now, Can We Sweep the Capitol?" The Times took the side of the protesters - and the Unions - and therefore made it pretty clear pretty quick what was really going on.

Times communist Dan Barry, who used to be funny, tells the story of the blue-collar Madison Wisconsin capitol building janitors who are in the midst of that state's protest over plans to end collective bargaining rights and more free stuff from state government. The featured character in Barry's story - a 26 year-old janitor type named Aaron Pazour - does not belong to the Union, but Barry reminds us four times in the course of his article - FOUR TIMES - that Pazour would be in the union if he could.

An opinion puff piece on the front page masquerading as hard news. Thanks NYT for making it clear what is really going on in Wisconsin.

From the article :

"Myriad signs and banners covered nearly every inch of wall space — from rants against the Tea Party to reminders to finish one bag of bread before opening another one. But one sign caused more consternation than most: It said “Unisex,” and it kept appearing on the door of a women’s bathroom." 

Not Unionized Despite the Times' Best Efforts

The Twitter Protests in the Arab World Are A Dream Come True for the Reality Fugitives at the New York Times...

2/28/11 - Click to Enlarge

...for now.

There is a reason that these nations were colonized by Europeans, and that their current national boundaries were created by the Skykes-Picot Agreement of 1916. (Check it Out).

As the Arab World Aspires to Turn European Overnight, The NYT Says: "Nothing to See Here Folks, Move Along"

2/27/11 - Click to Enlarge

"As Regimes Fall in Arab World, Al Qaeda Sees History Fly By."

For weeks now, the self-hating reality contortionists at Amerika's newspaper of record have been bleating breathlessly over the mindless upheaval taking place in the Arab world. They have ruined our breakfasts on a daily basis with appetite-annihilating front page photos of hordes of dirty beards (always male, always 26 years old) chanting and holding up signs in English saying that they want European-style "democracy."

From the article :

" The demonstrators have used force defensively, treated Islam as an afterthought and embraced democracy, which is anathema to Osama bin Laden and his followers."

Oh, I see. Islam is NOT a threat, after all. Thank you NYT for making that clear.

NYT - Approved √ (With an Average IQ of 89*, and an Economy
that Depends on Western-Created Technologies, What Do You Think Will
Happen to These Societies Stuck in the Middle Ages at Best?)

*Source: Tatu VanHanen

Apologizing for Dark-Ages Islamic Savagery in the Subtlest of Ways

In an article published yesterday in the New York section of Amerika's newspaper of record entitled "Mubarak, Terrorism, and Their Tie," Times communist Jim Dwyer brings us back to the more innocent era of 1993, before the blind sheik Omar Rahman was convicted for his role in bringing Stone-Age diversity to New York City, where he and his Islamic followers with dirty beards tried a first time to bring down the Twin Towers (the 12th anniversary of that frontal assault on Western Civilization took place yesterday, the 26th of February).

But instead of condemning this primitive Stone-Age scum in any way, Dwyer actually suggests that their behaviour is directly the result of US-backed oppression of Mubarak opponents.

From the article :

"In “The Looming Tower,” a Pulitzer Prize-winning history of terrorism leading to 9/11, Lawrence Wright argued that humiliation in the prisons nurtured a violent rage. “Egypt’s prisons became a factory for producing militants whose need for retribution — they called it justice — was all-consuming,” Mr. Wright wrote. Even after 9/11, the Egyptian authorities were used by the United States to carry out interrogations and acts that would have been illegal for United States agents. The coils of history are wound too tightly to imagine that a world without Mr. Mubarak would have spared New York City its worst moments. At least we can hope that they are all behind us."

 So you see, according to the sick, demented self-loathing elitists at the NYT, Islamic barbary is really our fault.

The New York Times: playing for the other team since 1984.

Paying Good Money to Sniff Out Racism Wherever it Isn't

2/26/11 - Click to Enlarge

The reality contortionists at the New York Times killed two birds with one stone today in an article that takes groveling before blacks to new heights. In "Seeking Stories of Lynching as Accounts of Faith," Times communist Samuel G. Freedman (email him)  tells the story of one Reverend Doctor Angela D. Sims (the long made-up name like a Louis Vuitton handbag, fake, made in China) who recently received thirty grand in grant money to travel the country to sniff out stories of perceived racism from long ago.

The Times is in love with race hustlers like the Rev. Sims, because it gives them a chance to cover multiple bases of their agenda. They get to speak in glowing terms of a minority courageously in search of racial justice, a female minority at that, and one who can be even more elevated by her validating association with "faith." 

Apparently the good Doctor Reverend Esquire handbag Sims  had no problem finding old blacks to talk about evil whitey from way back when. These old blacks, already half demented and not too bright to start with, egged on and coached by Dr. Sims to imagine evil lynchings from way back when, have already been egged on and coached by what are ultimately the most evil of whites: the elitists like the communists at the New York Times who have been whispering in the ears of blacks for decades, telling them that all their suffering and all their failure is the fault of evil whitey. 

Dimwit black-studies types like Doctor (chortle) Sims make a good living out of this shit, so obviously it is in their interest to keep the hate alive through historical revisionism. And when you have your nation's newspaper of record behind you 110%, it's like sailing into the sunset with the wind at your back, pina coladas on deck and the sound of Jimmy Buffet playing in the background.

From the article:

"Fortified with a $30,000 grant from the Louisville Institute, she started the search in May 2009, sending hundreds of e-mails to personal and professional contacts, asking if anyone knew anyone who might know anything. That scattershot appeal yielded the intitial 45 interview subjects. They told Ms. Sims of seeing black men castrated, of finding chared bodies, of walking on blood-soaked ground. They told her of the pervasive fear of doing something that could bring forth a lynch mob. [i.e., muh dick] They told her, too, of the unexpected intervention of some whites. One man recounted how he had escaped an impending lynching because he was tipped off by a Ku Klux Klan member, who happened to have been his father's boss." 

So here we have, once again, the New York Times reporting third-party hearsay as historical certainty. Anything to further their agenda.

We have seen before that the Times commits its crimes as much by outright lies as by omission. In this case, it is worth noting that the Times fails to report on the fact that of the seven thousand or so documented lynchings that occurred in the South, some 2,000 were actually of whites accused of some impropriety, usually of a sexual nature.

Worse, the Times lends credibility to this two-bit race hustling poverty pimp preacher and her feeble attempt to re-write history, while never mentioning that most amazing and certainly accurate historical accounts of life during and after slavery, the 1930s-era Slave Narratives, preserved for all to see in the Library of Congress (check them out! Fascinating reading). Of course, the Times will prop up this idiot Sims, while playing down the validity of the Slave Narratives. Why? Because the vast majority of the thousands of old blacks who tell their stories in this Work Projects Administration project speak positively of their lives before the end of slavery.

From the Slave Narratives, for example, we have recollections such as this:

Beautiful, wrenching, historically accurate stuff from 1936.

Today though, we have the Good Doctor Reverend Esquire Jr. III handbag and her ilk paid good money by white institutions to rewrite history with a decidedly anti-Western, social justice agenda slant. And the New York Times, the Great Equalizer, is their Great Enabler. 

Mmmmmm-Hmm

The New York Times: Promoting Oneness Since 2001

Never Forget

Ever.

A Picture Tells a Thousand Lies

Does the Times want you to think this is a mug shot of an evil Wall Street type or a mafia criminal? 

Answer: Yes they do. 

Meanwhile, over in the arts section, we have an African American woman vaulting over a group of prostrate whites, including the prerequisite gaggle of fairies in the dhimmi position. 

Does the Times do this on purpose? 

Answer: Yes they do. 

The New York Times Plays Down the Stone-Age Savagery of the Somali Pirates, Practically Justifies Murder Aboard the Quest

2/24/11 - Click to Enlarge 

The New York Times is a disgusting newspaper. The way the self-loathing dhimmis at the Times smear all things Western is so sickening and disheartening that they manage to put me in a permanent bad mood every day.

It is so sad to see the newspaper of record of a once great nation roll over and assume the dhimmi position:  facing away from Mecca, on knees, face to ground, posterior elevated to facilitate sodomization by the turd world rabble whose cause the Times increasingly fights indefatigably for.

The crypto-delusional reality fugitives at the Times are becoming more fanatical in their anti-Western scorn: they're going so overboard in their hysterical promotion of all things non-Western that it would be laughable if it weren't so deadly serious.

Take for instance the way the Times reports on the recent Somali pirates murders. In a front page article published today entitled "Role of F.B.I. Is Questioned in Pirate Case," the lying freaks in the skyscraper across from the 42nd Street bus terminal manage to put the stone-age unter-menschen from Somali on the same footing as the Navy commandos who stormed the hijacked sailboat (it's not a yacht you Times vermin) "Quest," only to find that the four Americans had already been murdered by Somali scum.

Now, in a sane civilization, the newspaper of record would have a natural and healthy contempt for something as loathsome and hateful as a Somali pirate. In the great hierarchy of things even a cockroach with AIDS is one step above a gibs muh dat Somali, and a thousand steps above a Somali pirate, but the New York Times feels the need in their quest (no pun) for infinite moral superiority to themselves be the Great Equalizer, and level all things out to achieve enlightened Oneness.

From the article:

"Somali pirate specialists say the pirates once had an informal code of conduct that required members treat one another well and not harm hostages, valuable commodities who draw ransom on average of about $4 Million. But while Somali pirates might once have been a tight-knit, disciplined group motivated by money, not murder, pirates and pirate experts say the lure of big money was attracting less-disciplined young Somalis hungry to share in the new riches." 

I see: Somalian piracy is a business like any other.

Like deluded high-school students hell bent on a global social justice campaign, the NYT in their self-appointed rôle as Great Equalizer presents the news with a decidedly anti-Western slant.

The NYT : Cheering on the Turd World since the Retreat of the West.

Nick Kristof Does It Again

And it is a feeble, if predictable accomplishment : 

"Delirious Joy in Bahrain" : Times communist Nick Kristof seems to have zero grasp on realty.  He is like a giggling little girl, totally but totally oblivious to the fact that the Arab World is the Third World - as Saddam himself has said, and Quaddafi has repeated. The countries of the Middle East exist along boundaries conceived by old European white guys. This reality seems to escape Times reality fugitive Nick Kristof.

Sorry, Today Monday's NYT Front Page Not Available

The NYT Wants You To Believe that 1.5 Billion Muslims Desire Nothing More Than "Democracy"

2/19/11 - Click to Enlarge

"Delirious Joy in Bahrain", by Times Dhimmi Nicholas Kristof... Jesus Christ what the New York Times is doing is so disgusting that I'm too depressed to even bash them tonight.

Tune in tomorrow Sunday, hopefully I'll have my strength back by then to write the truth about the lies that the New York Times is publishing on a daily basis about what is happening in the Islamic Turd World, what with the stone-agers in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain, and now Libya thinking that by overthrowing their rulers, they will become Europeans overnight.

It's not so much that they (arabs) are thinking that, it's that they're being led to think that, precisely by the kind of one-world universal egalitarianism white elites at places like the NYT, who use European created ideals and technology to hypnotize non-Europeans into a false ideal of world oneness.

It's all so fucking childish and stupid, I swear I cannot take it anymore.

And it gets worse:

"Chilean Priest Found Guilty of Abusing Miners": the crypto delusional one-worlders at Amerika's newspaper of record couldn't even let the poor Chilean miners have their day without using them as an excuse to drag down the Catholic Church, which the Times hates almost as much as white males.

For the past year, for Chrissakes, there has been every single day in the Times some story or another that dregs up the so-called Church Abuse Scandal. Every. Single. Day. 


Meanwhile, in the Islamic world, you have daily acts of atrocious barbarism committed in the name of the Prophet Muhamed the pedophile, while that quaint Religion of Peace has imams in dirty beards howling at their pulpits for the beheading of the infidels (that would be you), and yet the Times has nary a word to print on the matter.

I'm so sick of it, I can't take it anymore. Somebody please let me out of here.

The Dhimmis at the New York Times Pave the Way for the Rise of Islamist Extremism by Insisting These Folks Are Just Like the Cunninghams

2/16/11 - Click to Enlarge

"In One Slice of Egypt, Daily Woes Top Religion"

The NYT Says: "We Will Put Islam In Your Face Until You Tolerate NOW!"

2/14/11 - Click to Enlarge

"A Chicken War In New York, Where Afghans Rule the Roost"

"Some Muslims Use Speed Dating to Spur Marriage"

Cheering on the Demise of the West in the Most Subtle of Ways

2/13/11 - Click to Enlarge

As we have seen before on this blog, the New York Times is playing for the other team, and by "other team" we mean the 92% of the rest of the world that is not of European heritage.

When the Times does write about average European-Americans, they always, always choose to focus on individuals who are either disabled, gay, criminally insane, or dead. That last category is presumably how the sick marxists at Amerika's newspaper of record would like to see all normal, non-deviant Americans.

Today's Sunday edition of the NYT was chock-a-block full of the usual invectives against the hated majority and that most evil of creatures in the eyes of the Times: the white adult male.

Times-Approved √

But the pinko commies took the anti-Western propaganda to a new level of sneaky today in an article entitled "Missing Micrograms Set A Standard on Edge," penned by Times communist Sarah Kyall. Appearing on page A12 of the International section, Lyall's snide little puff piece tells the story of the French organization outside Paris that is responsible for the units of measurement upon which the metric system is based.

In a sane civilization, some mention would be made in such an article of the laudable nature of the origins of a system created by one rather generous particular group of people - a group moreover now a tiny minority of global population (<8%) - for the enjoyment of the entirety of the rest of humanity. But clearly the NYT does not represent the sane portion of humanity: they want to give it all away, including even claim to the accomplishments of their forbears,  because that's what morally superior elitists do in order to make the halo over their pointy heads shine more brightly.

Lyall's article ostensibly tells the story of how the original international prototype of the kilogram - "as pampered a hunk of platinum and iridium as ever existed" - created by the ingenious Frenchies in 1889, has inexplicably lost some 50 micrograms.

But what Sarah and the puppet masters at the Times are sickly and subliminally implying of course, is that the great accomplishments of the West are passé, and it is time to step aside to give our noble savage oppressed friends from the "developing world" their chance in the spotlight.

From the article:

"The most obvious argument for the prototype's eventual obsolescence is the tautological underpinning of its existence, which calls to mind the question: 'How long is a piece of string.'"

 Translation of this nonsensical Timesspeak: "Not only is Western civilization and all of its accomplishments hurtling towards extinction, really smart people like the communists at the Times are starting to figure out that Western supremacy is based upon something that is illegitimate anyway."

If you think I am being paranoid, and that the New York Times is not in the midst of some sinister campaign to undo the West, then I am afraid you are sorely mistaken and may wish to link over now to the Huffington Post, where you will be comforted with laughable liberal lies.

The New York Times: Comforting the Afflicted and Afflicting the Comfortable since 1972.

The One-World Wishful Thinkers at the NYT Make Their Eugenics Agenda Clearer and Clearer

The New York Times has a eugenics agenda for humanity, and if you are of a certain non-fashionable

2/12/11 - Click to Enlarge 

hue then chances are that you're not part of that plan.

As we know, the ubermenschen of moral superiority at Amerika's newspaper of record do more than suggest an agenda - they influence policy at the highest levels of decision-making, with consequences that ultimately effect every living being on the planet. Imagine having the power to influence who is born and who dies. 

The New York Times possesses that power, and yet they wield it with criminal irresponsibility, eroding with each elitist liberal lie a little more of the foundations of Western Civilization.

New York Times communist and diversity enforcer Susan Saulny - the light-skinned mulatto* who gave us the breathless eugenics manifesto ""Black? White? Asian? More Young Americans Identify as All of the Above" a few short days ago - comes back kicking today with another gleeful population replacement piece entitled "In A Multiracial Nation, Many Ways to Tally" published of course on the front page.

In a clear indication that the NYT is going to milk the 2010 census data for all its worth,

"...statistics on ethnicity and race are used for many important purposes. These include assessing disparities in health, education, employment and housing, enforcing civil rights protections, and deciding who might qualify for special consideration as members of underrepresented minority groups."

And can you believe they got away with this: 

“They’re all lumped together — blacks, Asians and Latinos — and they all look the same from the data perspective,” said Daniel J. Losen, a policy expert for the Civil Rights Projectat the University of California, Los Angeles, referring to the Department of Education aggregation. “But the reality is much different. There are different kinds of discrimination experienced by these subgroups.”

“It’s a big problem for researchers,” Mr. Losen continued, “because it throws a monkey wrench in our efforts at accountability, student tracking and the study of trends.”

(*"The word ‘mulatto’ is derived from the Arabic muwallad, which originally referred to persons who were not ‘genuine’ Arabs, especially individuals born of black-white ‘misalliances’. With the beginning of the transatlantic African slave trade in the fifteenth century, the word mulatto first found its way into Portuguese, and then into almost all European languages, as the term for offspring of mixed European (Caucasian) and African (Negroid) parentage. (Only Afrikaans used the word ‘Bastard’ for such persons." Source: tiny.cc/zdnnx)

Today: More Whining About Illegal "Students"

The New York Times is a truly devious and disgusting newspaper. In an article published on page A15 of today's national 

2/9/11 - Click to Enlarge

edition entitled "After A False Dawn, Anxiety for Illegal Immigrant Students," the communists at Amerika's newspaper of record make the case once again for the alleged 1.1 illegal Mexicans who are receiving free lunches at high schools and community colleges across the country. 

The New York Times won't be satisfied until their population replacement agenda is fulfilled, and every newborn in the country is named either Miguel, Muhammed, or Hu.

It's funny how the ludicrous figure of 1.1 million illegal Hispanic "students" cited by the Times communist who wrote this propaganda puff piece, Julia Preston, is exactly one tenth of the even more ludicrous number of "11.2 Million Illegals" that the Times wants you to believe is the true number of illegal immigrant invaders sucking up American resources. Funny too how Julia Preston is the devious Times communist behind both "After A False Dawn" and the repugnant and misleading  "11.2 Million Illegal Immigrants in U.S. in 2010, Report Says; No Change From '09," published February 1st. 

2/6/11 - Click to Enlarge

Today is not yesterday, 2011 is not 2010, and this decade is certainly not the 1980s. Make no mistake: every day it is a slow and inexorable trend, this sea-shift to a New World Order where right is wrong, white is black, and up is down.

There are dark, sinister forces at work that are every bit as evil as the upper echelons of Hitler's propaganda ministry. (Related viewing: "The Downfall.") 

The same exact manifestation of evil we saw there we see today in the social engineering elite who have deconstructed a once-great civilization, and are about 15% through with wrecking it.

Watering Down the Threat of Jihad in Egypt: The New York Times Displays Major Dhimmitude

2/4/11 - Click to Enlarge

In a stunningly one-sided article published under a large banner headline on the front page of Thursday's paper, the fiendish reality contortionists at Amerika's newspaper of record continued their
goosestepping parade of lies down the Boulevard of Misinformation about what is really happening in Egypt. 

"Mubarak's Backers Storm Protesters as U.S. Condemns Violent Turn," screams the headline. Further reading reveals that Times communists David D. Kirkpatrick and Kareem Fahim are solidly on the side of the "protesters," and are no longer even trying to hide their bias. 

If one were to believe the Times, the protesters consist of nothing but dentists, teachers and other non-threatening bourgeois types who are all holding hands and singing peacefully, while US-backed anti-Islamist Mubarak and his peeps are raining sticks and stones down upon the Islamists' innocent heads. 

From the article: 

"The anti-Mubarak protesters had organized themselves to try to avoid violence. Men held hands in long chains to keep the two groups apart. Others, with effusive apologies, searched those entering the square for weapons. Some stepped in with whistles to break up arguments that had grown heated." 

Amazing, ain't it? The Times wants you to believe that the only violence being committed in Egypt right now is by anti-Islamists. What is wrong with this picture? How is it possible for America's newspaper of record to take sides like this? 

From the article: 

"Rocks and sticks began to fly from the pro-Mubarak forces int the crowd of anti-Mubaral demonstrators. Even then, many tried to avoid retaliation. A line of a half dozen unarmed men stood quietly, waving their hands in the air while the pro-Mubarak forces rained rocks down on them." 

The dangerous liberals who set the record for American policy-making are on fire with glee; their lies are becoming more and more over-the-top. Make no mistake: the NYT is accelerating the pace at which they are pushing for a New World Order, wherein further chaos and instability will enable them (they hope) to further even more effortlessly their globalist, pro-"oppressed", redistributionist, historically revisionist agenda. 

In Cairo and throughout the country, the Bronze-Age primitives of Egypt are reverting to their ancestors' favorite dispute resolution techniques - throwing stones. What is it btw with muslims and stone-throwing? (The Israeli army took so many to the noggin that they had to develop a stone-throwing machine to fight back on equal terms. [Even though the New York Times wanted to make them put the stones in bubblewrap]). 

Today's article is unique, though, in the way that the authors insist over and over that the anti-Mubarak demonstrators are non-violent, even if it means presenting evidence of this improbability in the most convoluted of ways. For example, like this: 

"Abandoning any attempt to avoid violence, thousands of anti-Mubarak protesters used scraps of steel to rip up the pavement into pieces, carrying them in milk crates and scarves to hurl back at their attackers." 

WTF?! "Hurl back at their attackers"?! These lying bastards at the Times really do have no shame. 

Dimwit Maureen Dowd Is Giddy As Egypt Teeters on Charia

2/2/11 - Click to Enlarge

In a repulsive op-ed piece by Times communist Maureen Dowd entitled "Bye, Bye Mubarak," the NYT's resident unveiled-dhimmi Dowd, like a high school student trying to please a leftist teacher, spends the first half of the article belittling "W" and the second half sucking up to Islamists.

From the article: 

"In another irony, one of the reasons Bush decided he needed to do something about the Arab dictatorships was his belief that they were spawning terrorists. But to try to fulfill his grandiose promise to defeat “every terrorist group of global reach,” he needed the cooperation of the same dictators the U.S. had always supported. And he fell back to relying on the help of dictatorships to try to shut down dictatorships. Instead, he shut down the democratization process in 2006 after he and Rice were blindsided by Hamas winning the Palestinian elections."

How is it possible to have children writing the opinion articles of Amerika's newspaper of record. This is beyond embarrassing.

Explaining Leftism: The Science of Morals-Confining Behaviour

2/1/11 - Click to Enlarge 

Why does a smart guy like Julian Assange hate the West - and therefore his own kind - so much?

Remember that Assange's Wiki Leaks first gained fame a few months back, when they released the video of what they suggestively entitled "Collateral Murder" - the video shot from the deck of an Apache helicopter that rained hot led down on a bunch of dubious Iraqis, including an Iraqi cameraman for Reuters.

Well, we think we have figured out liberalism, and the sick mindset of people like Assange, who think that they are morally superior because they champion the causes of those who don't look like them.

(TO BE CONTINUED)

We'll Have Fun With This Later ;-) 

Giving Credit In the Rare Instances Where Credit is Due

Sometimes we are a little hard on the New York Times, we admit. Because after all, it can be a very entertaining newspaper, and by entertaining I don't mean just the fun of spotting the over-the-top leftist bias.

One example of superb reporting and downright fine wordcraft was published in last Sunday's Magazine.   "Dealing With Julian Assange and the Wiki Leaks Secrets"  by Executive Editor Bill Keller is a monster 10-page (online) history of the WikiLeaks affair and how the Times dealt personally with dickhead Julian Assange.

But while Keller's article goes into minute and masterful detail on the actual publication of the leaks, he is still a Times communist and as such makes no attempt to downplay the inherently anti-Western flavor of the whole scandal. Keller does however deserve praise for pointing out that the Guardian of the UK used the WikiLeaks nonsense to produce a specifically anti-American message. And as can be expected from a high-ranking Times communist, Keller goes to extreme lengths to remind readers of just how much time he and his colleagues at the Times spend worrying about the morality of their actions.

Nevertheless, one reason I so enjoyed reading Keller's piece on Assange was that it was almost totally devoid of the usual social justice sloganeering that one finds in section A of Amerika's newspaper of record every single weekday. To not be reminded every other article of the joys of diversity or the evils of the Tea Party for a solid hour was a blissful departure from the road more travelled of the usual Times snivel and drivel.

Also on Sunday, the Times published this doozy of a wool-over-the-eyes piece on global inequality:
"The Neighbour's Wealth." We know that any time the Times decides to report on the politically uncomfortable topic of group differences in achievement, we are in for some serious journalistic gymnastics and tiptoeing around the truth. But with this review by Times communist Catherine Rampell (the Times' economics editor for Chirssakes), we have to wonder: if you're going to lie about and avoid the truth this much, why even bother to publish the article in the first place?  It's like busy work for journalists.

"The Neighbour's Wealth," aka "The Haves and the Have Nots," is written by a World Bank economist and "development specialist" named Branko Milanovic. You'd think the guy would be an expert, and know about "IQ and the Wealth of Nations", the Lynn/VanHanan book (you can read an extensive preview here) which actually quotes extensively from World Bank reports, but noooooo. A good World Bank bureaucrat has to toe the party line, and they know they can count on the psychotic pussies at the New York Times to further cover up their coverup.

Instead of saying anything even remotely meaningful on the topic, never mind coming within light years of pointing out the utterly obvious about global inequality, the Times in their endless nastiness actually find a way - yes! - of bashing Europe and America, and blaming the rich (read: white people) for said inequality, while at the same time whining about the "rich poor" living in obesity in the welfare states of the West. If you can believe it.

From the review:

"[Milanovic] ... makes interesting international comparisons. The typical person in the top 5 percent of the Indian population, for example, makes the same as or less than the typical person in the bottom 5 percent of the American population. That’s right: America’s poorest are, on average, richer than India’s richest — extravagant Mumbai mansions notwithstanding.

"It is no wonder then, Milanovic says, that so many from the third world risk life and limb to sneak into the first. A recent World Bank survey suggested that 'countries that have done economically poorly would, if free migration were allowed, remain perhaps without half or more of their populations.' Mass-migration attempts are met with sealed borders in the developed world, which then results in the deaths of thousands of anonymous indigents journeying to promised lands only to be swallowed up by the Mediterranean or charred in the Arizona desert."

Disgusting, unbelievable stuff. Do these people have no shame? Do they not see how stupid they sound writing this clap trap? I mean Goooood, how is it possible for a supposedly advanced nation to have a "newspaper of record"  like this? 


[By the way, Miss Rampell: if you're reading this, you might want to go here to see what is really happening in the Arizona desert].

We Can Have This.... Or...

This...

This...

And This.