Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Thursday, December 30, 2010

A Refreshingly Honest Critique of Islamic Ridiculousness, But With a Condition

Check out this interesting article published on the front page of America's newspaper of record, entitled "Reshaping of Mecca Turns to Gargantuan Glitz" and written by Times architecture critic Nicolai Ouroussoff.

What astounded me when I started reading this piece was that the New York Times would dare use such words as "kitsch," "grotesque," and "cynical" in the first paragraphs of an article discussing Muslims.

But you will see that it turns out to be too good to be true: the crypto-neurotic reality fugitives at the Times just could not bring themselves to publish an article ragging exclusively on a thoroughly ridiculous civilization without throwing in a little social justice propaganda.

From the article:

"But the Vegas-like aura of these projects can deflect attention from the real crime: the way the developments are deforming what by all accounts was a fairly diverse and unstratified city." 
It almost feels like the loons at the Times included the social justice angle mid-article to atone for the honesty with which they report on Saudia Arabia's childlike excesses in Mecca, using money obtained from Westerners to hire Westerner to design buildings off-limits to Westerners.

Big-Ben, Arab-Style: Not Approved by NYT, But Only Because Off-Limits
To The Poor


Juniper in the Desert said...

About the same level as this, from Abu Dhabi(you couldn't make it up):


Mic Jagger said...

Happy New Year SAS readers.

You know, it's hard to say something cheery and friendly and then talk about the filthy shithole that is Africa and how disgusting the idea of its population doubling every few decades (thanks to stupid white enablers) is.

I think that a lot of the people who gripe on this site (and others) have legitimate complaints about negroes - the nogs make it easy to hate them - and I bet that 95% of the people who visit here are morally upright enough to have just a little bit of guilt about how much they hate niggers. I know I do (hate niggers).

Of course, like many great Africa observers who have said similar things said before me (Albert Schweitzer), I for one am capable of being friends with blacks on an individual level. It is as a group that they seriously piss me off.

The thought of Africa's coming population bomb distresses me to no end. There is no more urgent a threat to the planet today than Africa's demographic incontinence - NOT ONE! But the sad, tragic, fucked up thing is that there is no one to take up this cause in the main stream. Rather we have fake pussified causes such as global warming, anti-drunk driving, anti-smoking, etc., that are designed by the liberal elite to channel the natural angst and rage of a population that needs a safety valve through which to vent.

The rise of Nazi Germany, and the German people's anger, was in many ways the result of legitimate grievances. There is nothing in the world more human than hatred - hatred of illness, hatred of the cold, hatred of hunger, hatred of pain, etc. Conversely, there is nothing more natural and human than love of one's one self, of one's own kind, of one's own country.

But nationalism has become taboo in today's misguided, secular nihilism. The West denies its greatness to itself, while at the same time making it illegal to express natural emotions of frustration that in a sane world would be directed at certain groups.

There is an interesting article in the OP ED section of today's New York Times that talks about how sports have become the new religion in a secular West. (Of course the Times fails to make the distinction between the West and the rest of the low-IQ Turd world). Check it out:


I guess my whole point - and forgive me if I'm getting too philosophical on New Year's Eve - is that you can hate niggers and not be a racist, you know?

It's what I call the group/individual dynamic. It's almost a Shakespearian concept: in Romeo and Juliet, the two protagonists hate the group (the family), but do not hate each other.

I wonder what Shakespeare would have said about niggers.

Happy New Year, keep talking, never stop thinking, and SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT THE DANGERS OF AN OVERPOPULATED AFRICA!