Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Imagine If Adolf Hitler Had This Guy Doing Sign Language During His Speeches

Thur. 29 Jan MMXV
The guy doing the signing for half-black Bill is actually pretty impressive. Interestingly, he is deaf.  His name is Jonathon Lamberton, he is 38 and married to a non-deaf woman.

The vermin at the New York Times did an important article on Lamberton on the front page of their
New York section in today's national print edition :

"Sign Language Interpreter For Mayor di Blasio Is An Internet Hit"

It is interesting to note that in the press conference in the vid above, (and indeed in all of his work for NYC), Lamberton is not watching de Blasio (the clinically insane Mayor of New York with Daddy Issues);  he is watching his wife seated in the front row of the press corps, who is signing an initial interpretation of what half-black Bill is spewing (in the case of the video above, an almost one-hour press conference about a snowstorm that never even really happened. It must suck to be so irrelevant). Just imagine the level of communication between that husband and wife team. It is actually quite touching.

I find watching this guy do his work very real and very inspiring (even if what he is translating is borderline nonsense in a Big Picture kind of way). This man is a professional, just imagine the level you would have to be at in ASL (American Sign Language) to produce a transcript of what he is "saying".

That said (signed), why does the mayor have to have a member of the handicapped community taking up one third of the tv screen when they could simply scroll captions?

Answer: because Adolf Hitler never had a sign-language interpreter during any of his speeches.

(Warning: the You Tube community has identified this video as being potentially offensive to certain groups. Viewer excretion is advised)

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Muskogee Fatal Police Shooting : Full Video

100% justified and then some.

Not a PEEP from the criminal reality manipulators at the New York Times, though:

Monday, January 26, 2015

Sunday, January 25, 2015

The Wanton, Criminal Blame-Shifting By The Vermin at The New York Times Reaches New Heights of Indignant Minority-Uplift Dishonesty

Sun. 25 January 2015
"Food Is A Death Sentence To These Kids"

"Ghettoside: A True Story of Murder in America"

'Meant To Keep Malaria Out, Mosquito Nets Are Used To Haul Fish In"

From their front page, to their Book Review, to their Magazine, the vermin at Amerika's newspaper of Record have their forked tongues thrust so far up the rectums of the Africans they so lovingly claim to uplift not just here in the States, but worldwide, that one would think that the super-smart journalists of 42nd Street would start to get wise to just how hilarious and demented - and devoid of all irony, cynicism, and even the tiniest touch of humor - the whole situation truly is.

In the first piece, the one smack in the middle of today's NYT Magazine (whose front page story btw, "Fox News Wants You [Yeah, YOU]" is about how the evil Fox News syndicate is trying to push for the same types of "intelligent" viewers as those who read the New York Times {Can Megan Kelly make Fox News appeal to people who... well, read The New York Times?, by Jim Rutenberg})... the first piece is about a morbidly obese retarded 13 year-old black girl in the care of its single-mother, Rhoda, who the vermin at the Times helpfully point out is a recently-fired "Home Health Aid" currently on Medicaid, as in, um.. welfare.  (The Reality Contortionists at the Times also remind us in their article that Rhoda, before being fired from her job as home health aid, was studying chemical biology and has an MBA from her time at College).

(Why is it that all these ghetto mammies seem to  be ex-Home Health Aides?). 

However we digress : the poor, blobulous, slope-headed "child" in the picture above (the one on the left), is indeed by accident of birth and unfortunate genetic mutations of nature over tens of thousands of years in the making, a victim of just plumb plain bad luck and shittiness, secondmost, and firstmost, to the sheer inbred stupidity of her fast-reproducing peers, first and foremost (that's you,  momma Rhoda).

And yet the misguided, reality-reversing, not-so-secretly anti-white professional blame-shifters at Amerika's newspaper of record, make it sound like this retarded kid's misfortunes are 100% innocent and accidental from a behavioural point of view, first and foremost, and that secondly and most importantly, society has a duty to spend literally 2000% more on this child, than it would on a normal ghetto child, given its clinical obesity and retarded nature.

That's right: 2000% might even be an underestimate. In the article  "Food Is A Death Sentence To These Kids" - read it yourselves! - it is clearly stated that a mere sixty-five day program to care for this 300-pound turd costs the American taxpayer upwards of 1500 per day, and this includes the cost of transporting its mammy (pictured above) by airliner, as well as housing and feeding it - feeding both of them! - and yet the criminal, hateful, verminous little weasels at the New York Times make absolutely NO mention of this.

Which brings us to the second feature in the Times' negrophile whine-fest, published on the very front page of today Sunday's book review:  "Ghettoside: A True Story of Murder in America."

Here we have New York Times communist Jennifer Gonnerman (Gonnerman, !) whining in unison with Ghettoside "author" Jill Leovy.

From Leovy's laughably inaccurate screed :

"Like so many murder victims, Bryant is young (just 18 years old) and nonwhite. But as it happens, he is also the son of Wallace Tennelle, a highly respected African-American detective with the Los Angeles police. Tennelle is the first detective to arrive at the crime scene, only to find his son splayed on the grass, his brain matter everywhere.
Reading this scene and the ones that follow — when Tennelle has to reveal to his wife what just happened, when all the family members converge at the hospital — I actually felt physically sick. I can’t ever remember having that reaction to a book before, but in this case it may not be all that surprising. One-third of the way into Leovy’s book, it’s apparent that the true scope of our nation’s homicide problem — the extraordinary pain and trauma and despair that follow the murder of a loved one — is indeed sickening.
Leovy reported “Ghettoside” before the issue of police brutality exploded last year in the national news, and her focus is not on the misconduct of police officers."
The "issue of police brutality that exploded last year in the national news."

Does she mean Michael Brown assaulting a cop and then charging head-first at him?

Does she mean Eric Garner - another obese idiot - fighting with cops to prevent what would have been his sixtieth arrest?

Jesus Christ ! This shit is so old, and so stupid, that one would think that all the top-notch, high-priced writing talent employed in the gilded corridors of the New York Times would be able 
to have a little fun with the stupidity of it all.

I mean after all, it really makes good material for even the most mildly-intelligent, halfway-informed reader.

So why can't the New York Times be a little more honest - and a little less group-think, a little less politically conformist, in their reporting, eh?


Oh my Good Heavens, if you don't think that question is begged by the first two NYT articles sited today, consider the third :

 'Meant To Keep Malaria Out, Mosquito Nets Are Used To Haul Fish In"

White Man's Burden: Bill and Melinda's half-billion mosquito nets are being used by the locals to trap fish and soccer balls

Here we have a front-page Sunday Times doozy that is like a direct, and I mean direct, in-your-face indictment of all the do-gooder bullshit that informs the White man's childlike treatment  of his pet negroes in Africa today. I mean, the New York Times even mentions "White Man's Burden" in this article, although they most curiously ascribe the phrase not to Kipling, but to William Easterly.
"In many places, fish are dried for hours in direct sunlight on treated mosquito nets. Direct sunlight can break down the insecticide coating. Anthony Hay, an associate professor of environmental toxicology at Cornell University, said fish could absorb some of the toxins, leaving people to ingest them when they eat the fish.
“It’s just another one of these ‘white man’s burdens,’ ” Mr. Hay said, referring to William Easterly’s well-known book critical of foreign aid by the West. “We think we have a solution to everybody’s problems, and here’s an example of where we’re creating a new problem.”
The lowly, verminous, lying, hateful, anti-white scum at the New York Times once again try to pull a fast one on straight thinking people, this time by doing the unthinkable:

Even a child with access to Google would know that "White Man's Burden" is most closely associated with the politically-incorrect yet realistic turn-of-the-century works of the great Rudyard Kipling, and not some obscure leftist NYU professor born in 1957!

This is some of the best evidence we have ever documented of the intellectual groupthink cowards  at the New York Times being caught at their own game !


Everybody knows what the vermin at the New York Times wants: the decline of the Many in furtherance of the Dominance of the Few.  Except of course for a few members of the Tribe whose benefit it is not in to see their numbers fall. We are talking of course about Jewish Power. The End Game. The All Game. The Everything Game that the filthy reality contortionists at Amerika's newspaper of record work tirelessly to bring to the Fore, day in and day out.

The New York Times: A Sickening, Subversive Publication With Hatred For The Many, And Allegiance For the Few, Since 1898.


Sunday, January 11, 2015

Paris: Netanyahou, Merckel and Hollande Arm-in-Arm in Biggest Street Demonstrations in French History, But This is What French Arabs Really Think

The loud-mouthed angry young "imam" in the video is telling his cattle-eyed startled-looking flock that insulting the prophet is the worst possible offense (and therefore that the attack on Charlie was justified); that muslims didn't really do it ("show me their pictures!"), and that all French muslims want from their hosts is to convert to Islam.

What we have here is an obviously intellectually challenged (iq under 87?) aspiring-rapper-turned
 -preacher foaming at the mouth with hatred, envy and jealousy. He and his dull-witted followers have been egged on to despise their hosts by precisely the types of sanctimonious leftist elites that were targeted in Wednesday's attack. 

The killer irony of course is that if Adbul and Ahmed had managed to gun down the entire leadership of the National Front (the French anti-immigration party whose victory has been all but guaranteed by the attacks), the pathological altruists at Charlie Hebdo would have celebrated the event as a victory for their cause.

Charlie H, btw, is a vulgar cartoon magazine roughly equivalent to the US's Mad Magazine. The only difference between the two is that CH has a few extra grains of pretentious intellectualism sprinkled contemptuously upon it, in furtherance of the great French tradition of overthinking and over- politicising everything

Friday, January 9, 2015

"No Stronger Retrograde Force Exists In The World" : Winston Churchill on the Religion of Piece

Day 2 After Islam Paris Attack 

Sit Winston Spencer Churchill, "The River War," first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50).
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia (rabies) in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

"A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.

"No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”

Meanwhile, the despicable vermin at America's newspaper of record shamelessly spit in the face of a victimized people by coddling the enemy in our midst with drivel like this :

"Muslims are debating why their religion appears cited so often as a cause for violence and bloodshed"

That's right, "appears cited so often" as opposed to :

"IS a cause for violence and bloodshed"

(David Kirkpatrick, "Raising Questions Within Islam After France Shooting")

From the article, additional taqqyia-inspired islamicist apologia:
"A handful of non-Muslim researchers in the West — typically outside the academic mainstream — seek to build a case that Islam is inherently more violent than Judaism or Christianity by highlighting certain Quranic verses. But they struggle to explain away approving passages about violence in other religious texts, such as the book of Joshua in the Old Testament, the Book of Revelation in the New Testament, or the statement attributed to Jesus by the Gospel writer Matthew that “I come not to bring peace, but a sword.”
"Raymond Ibrahim, the author of “Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians,” argued in an interview that the passages in the Bible are descriptive but the Quranic ones are prescriptive. But most scholars say such distinctions are matters of interpretation.
"Mainstream Muslim scholars in the Arab world or the West emphasize the Prophet Muhammad’s injunctions to mercy and forgiveness, his forbidding of “coercion in matters of religion,” or his exhortation to restraint even in self-defense. “Fight in the cause of God against those who fight you, but do not transgress limits,” reads one verse. “God does not love transgressors.”
The New York Times: Verminous, Vile, and Villainous ... Since 1896.

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Muslim Murdering Monster Massacre In Paris Has Nick Kristoff Asking: "Is Islam To Blame?"

"Is Islam To Blame for the Shooting at Charlie Hebdo in Paris?"

Good God this de-balled little weasel is a sickening example of Western spinelessness.

The answer to the Paris muslim murdering scum is Sippenhaft. Look it up. It's what Israel does to the kin of their muslim terror scum.

From the op-ed :

"Terror incidents lead many Westerners to perceive Islam as inherently extremist, but I think that is too glib and simple-minded. Small numbers of terrorists make headlines, but they aren’t representative of a complex and diverse religion of 1.6 billion adherents. My Twitter feed Wednesday brimmed with Muslims denouncing the attack — and noting that fanatical Muslims damage the image of Muhammad far more than the most vituperative cartoonist.
"The vast majority of Muslims of course have nothing to do with the insanity of such attacks — except that they are disproportionately the victims of terrorism. Indeed, the Charlie Hebdo murders weren’t even the most lethal terror attack on Wednesday: A car bomb outside a police college in Yemen, possibly planted by Al Qaeda, killed at least 37 people."

The New York Times: Verminous, Anti-White Vitriol Since 1945.