Of course, anyone "crazy" enough to read blogs such as this one knows that the official History of WW2, and Amerika's role in it, has been officially re-written by the YKW victors, and scrubbed down to the bone to make it appear that there was one and only one true aggressor in the Great Conflict of 1939 - 1945.
How bizarre that the great Henry Ford - that Mark Zuckerberg of his time (okay bad analogy)- was himself forced to rescind on his true beliefs.
Ditto for Charles Lindbergh, depicted cartoonishly on the front cover of last Sunday's NYT Magazine, as saying "Nein" to the prospect of American military intervention in the early days of the Europea conflict, read: the invasion of France, and the early siege of Britannica :
What is truly of note however in the review of two major tomes of WW2 history considered in the illustrious pages of Amerika's newspaper of record, is the paucity of analysis of the role of the Jewish Question that lurked behind it all.
In their consideration of the recently published "Those Angry Days," NYT communist reviewers disdainfully refer to the Germany-sympathizer Chuck Lindbergh thus :
In what way though, today we have to ask, is this statement even a little untrue?
Answer: It's about a thousand times more true now than ever it was in the day that the great aviator annunciated it.
The New York Times: Zionist Controlled Since 1896, With A Thousand-Year Agenda Only One-Tenth Fully Realized to Date