Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Monday, June 29, 2015

From The Geniuses At H.U.D., A Guide To Section 8 Housing Dwellers ; Today's Tip : "How You Know If You Need Air Conditioning Repair"

You're not going to believe this.

This is from a government-affliiated website called "movesmart.org", which operates in the purview of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (of those nice folks who bring you Section 8).

The U.S. Government actually paid someone to write this, and it probably cost tens of thousands of dollars,  just for this one "article", never mind the site costs or the costs of the furnishings in every gleaming office of every H.U.D.-sponsored chapter of Teaching Tolerance (who get by with funding from the SPLC) :

From the fascinating "movesmart.org" :

How you know if you need air conditioning repair

blue repairIt can be easy to forget about your air conditioning system. Depending on where you live air conditioning can be something that you do not think about that often. usually you only use air conditioning when your home is too warm or hot and this usually occurs in the spring or summer. I know where I live it is expected to be as high as one hundred degrees in the summertime, talk about warm. In order to keep my house cool and comfortable I have no choice but to turn on my air conditioner. The worst thing that can happen is that it is incredibly hot outside and you go to turn on the air conditioner but it stops working. Then you are left with a hot house and wondering what to do. At times like that it is time to call your friendly air conditioning repair service like Blue Repair. I would usually advise people to not try to fix their air conditioning systems themselves as air conditioners are quite complicated and you could end up just damaging it more. Like many things the thing about air conditioners is good prevention methods and regular yearly servicing can help prevent costly repairs you may get later on. The reason for this is because many air conditioning units are on the outside of your house either on the ground or on your roof. It is important to locate where your air conditioner is in case you ever need to show a repair person where it is. As you can imagine most things left outside are exposed to the elements and while air conditioners are built to last that does not mean they cannot suffer from a little wear and tear. Leaves and dirt can actually get inside of your air conditioner unit and mess up a lot of its internal functions. A repair man can help prevent these things building up to keep your air conditioner running smooth. You might be wondering when you need to call your local air conditioner repair man and what signs you should be looking out for. Read on for a list of reasons you should call an air conditioner repair person.
1. No cool air is coming out of your vents
Now this is the most popular reason but it can have a many different causes. The first is that your conditioner unit might be clogged up with dirt and leaves and it is unable to turn on. The other reason could have to do with your thermometer inside the house. If your air conditioner turns on automatically based on the temperature in your house. That means you have an automated thermometer which could be not working due to a variety of reasons. The most common one that I have encountered is the battery on the thermometer is burned out and needs to be replaced. Either way by calling a repair professional you will be able to get your air conditioner back to perfect working condition in no time at all.

Friday, June 26, 2015

Charleston And Jewish Media Power : Turn The New York Times Blue

Dylann Storm Rawf was manna from heaven for the hateful little eunuchs at the New York Times.

The Charleston shooting has been above-the-fold front-page banner news for over a solid week at Amerika's newspaper of record ; the Sinister Ones of 42nd Street have had a wish come true.  And their glee is not likely to subside anytime soon.

The Charleston Bible Study Massacre has proven beyond a reasonable doubt how virulently anti-white the status-whoring good-think danger-scum at the New York Times truly are.
Mercifully, we are starting to see ordinary white Americans waking up to the exact same Jewish Media Power bullshit that made Rawf snap ; he evoked it in his naive but-not-unintelligently-written "manifesto," which along with select parts of the rest of it has been used by the vermin at the New York Times to stoke the flames of racial animosity in the U.S., and beyond, since last Wednesday, a great, repeat GREAT day in the annals of the civilization-wreckers at the NYT. 

Down-home low-level white resentment at Jewish media power caused the Charleston Bible Study Massacre. Make no mistake: this was a crime that has Eskimo fingerprints all over it. 

From the Chateau : 

U.S. agencies still collect crime data by race. That will end soon, because the data is unfriendly to the Equalist Narrative and is falling into the hands of the Rebel Alliance. For now, a rich trove of anti-antiracism Realtalk is yours for the hatebrowsing at various government websites.
From the 2013 FBI Crime Report:
Although blacks only constitute 12% of the total US population, they murder nearly as many whites as the number of whites murdered by other whites, who are 64% of the total US population.
This website is running a tally of black-on-white and white-on-black murders in the year 2014. The numbers currently stand at 348 BoW murders to 4 WoB murders.
But in fact, white-on-black crime is a statistical rarity. According to data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), an estimated 320,082 whites were victims of black violence in 2010, while 62,593 blacks were victims of white violence. That same year, according to the Census Bureau, the white and black populations in the U.S. were 196,817,552 and 37,685,848, respectively. Whites therefore committed acts of interracial violence at a rate of 32 per 100,000, while the black rate was 849 per 100,000. In other words, the “average” black was statistically 26.5 times more likely to commit criminal violence against a white, than vice versa. Moreover, blacks who committed violent crimes chose white victims 47.7% of the time, whereas whites who committed violent crimes targeted black victims only 3.9% of the time.
FBI stats show that blacks are 50 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites than vice versa.
John Derbyshire combs National Crime Victimization Survey data and does the math, finding that any given black was almost fifteen times more likely to have killed a white in 2013 than any given white was to have killed a black.
Derbyshire also responds to slithery reptilian leftoid critics who claim that the disproportionate black-on-white crime rates are simply a consequence of population ratios and nothing else.
The argument here is that blacks move among whites much more than whites move among blacks. We encounter blacks much less frequently than they encounter us, so of course we commit fewer crimes against them! If we moved among blacks more, we’d commit more crimes against them!
Er, possibly: but wouldn’t they also commit more crimes against us? And are we sure that the whites who avoid moving among blacks (why?) are just as criminally inclined as those who mingle?
Derb goes on to explain the math underlying the disparate black-on-white crime stats. Short story: Tim Wise can’t do math. But he sure can do sophistry, that rascally bloodsucker!
The arid “population ratio” argument against the idea of blacks deliberately targeting whites in racial antagonism crimes strikes me as specious for another reason. How often do upstanding members of the criminal class of blacks encounter whites in real life? Blacks are fairly concentrated in their rural and urban enclaves. (Even middle class suburban blacks tend to live in majority black neighborhoods.) For a benign “population ratio” argument to have any merit, you’d need to have conditions on the ground that greatly increased the actual encounter rate between blacks and whites. The crude population ratio number doesn’t accurately reflect the real world daily encounter rate between the races.
This is damning, because if the black-white encounter rate based on nothing but raw population ratio is much lower in actuality, it means the higher rate of black-on-white violence is even more shockingly disproportionate. It means black criminals are sometimes going out of their way to hunt for white prey, away from their monoracial districts.
Pussy cuckservatives often crouch into the defensive posture when the topic is black crime, reflexively bleating about “blacks killing other blacks, that’s the real problem”, preferring to ignore the low level race war of black-on-white violence. Yes, blacks kill other blacks far more prodigiously than they kill whites, but that skew is mostly a function of target availability and racial disposition toward impulsiveness; the great majority of liberal SWPL whites are smart enough to avoid living in the thick of the urban (and rural) ghettos, and to limit their exposure to black criminal predation. Even within city boundaries that have dense black populations, whites (and hispanics) sequester themselves into city sectors that are psychologically and economically, if not geographically, distant from the core black urban crimeclass.
It’s no secret that criminals prefer soft targets. If you walk a certain way, (i.e., like an alpha male), you can reduce the chance that you’ll be the target of street crime. It is likely the case that black criminals perceive the supple SWPL whites who live within prowling distance of them as soft, juicy targets of opportunity, made more inviting as hated prey objects by the whiteness of their appearance. Once a doughy white is in the black’s crosshairs, the racial hate instinct percolates from the subconscious into consciousness, often driving the attacker to a frenzy of depraved, intertribe violence. This is why it’s wrong to assume only premeditated interracial violence is classifiable as racially motivated hate crime; race hate does not abide exquisitely legalistic timelines. Hatred for racial outsiders can simmer for years or it can explode on sight in the heat of the moment.
Smartly, most whites have the good sense to segregate themselves from blacks, establishing themselves in “dindu buffer zones” that are geographic, technological, or economic in nature. It is what whites do, and especially what GoodWhite liberals do, (whether or not they admit to it), to provide themselves a measure of protection from the wildly disproportionate chaos and feral race hatred of black criminality.
So, yes, there’s a guerrilla race war happening in this country. It just isn’t the one you’ll hear about ad nauseam by our media, corporate, government, and academia Hivemind gatekeepers of information. They prefer you stay ignorant, self-flagellating, powerless, and victimized for the Great Globo-Equalist Cause.
A part of me hates writing posts like this one, as it really kills my chill vibe, but some lies are so dangerous and, worse, so humiliating to good people that I’m roused to action from my poolside lounge. And that is the worst crime of all.

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Berkeley Irish Balcony Disaster: The Soulless, Hate-Filled Competitive Altruism Fanatics At The New York Times Blame It On The Immigrants

Wed. 17 June MMXV
If the victims had not been white, would the vermin at the NYT really have spent three quarters of
the article talking about what a rowdy bunch they were ?

Imagine if the victims had been Somalis : the NYT would have found a way to blame the balcony collapse on the white man.

But in Berkeley, the victims were white and therefore they had it coming.

 "Deaths Of Irish Students In Berkeley Balcony Collapse Cast Pall On Program"

From the article :
"BERKELEY, Calif. — They come by the thousands — Irish students on work visas, many flocking to the West Coast to work in summer jobs by day and to enjoy the often raucous life in a college town at night. It was, for many, a rite of passage, one last summer to enjoy travel abroad before beginning a career.

"But the work-visa program that allowed for the exchanges has in recent years become not just a source of aspiration, but also a source of embarrassment for Ireland, marked by a series of high-profile episodes involving drunken partying and the wrecking of apartments in places like San Francisco and Santa Barbara."

That's right: the scummy builder/contractor (gee I wonder what continent he hails from) who saved eighty-five bucks by not using treated lumber on this balcony project is not to blame, the kids who died are (to blame).

That's what the vermin who punch up at the NYT want you to believe.


It's getting worse with the Times. They took Michael King and made a hundred and fifty front page feature stories about it. They took the Caitlin Jenner like a victory lap - in a few short years they have transformed an entire nation into good progressive thinkers, the polls show it.

Heck they even threw one of their success stories onto their front page today, an 18-year-old tranny with a fresh vaginoplastie (serious), who probably never would have deformed himself for life if such perversion had not for the past few years been so whole-heartedly endorsed by Amerika's newspaper of record

The sick, foul-minded reality reversers at Amerika's newspaper of record have succeeded in cramming their malevolent propaganda so deeply and so brazenly into the maw of the Great American Goy, that they believe their victim has forgotten how to swallow, forgotten how to fight back when confronted with the existential threat represented by the Times' virulent anti-white privilege, anti-Western, "punching-up" global social justice doctrine.

There is though, apparently some good news: the scum at the New York Times are becoming aware that their sick, non-stop pro-African American {nonwhite where applicable}  / anti-white agenda is proceeding with perhaps just a bit too much alacrity.

And that is why I take great pleasure in reporting that we here are not the only ones who noticed the sickening, clear-as-day hatred that the scum at the New York Times hold for anyone who is not a protected minority, in their reporting of the tragic death of six young Irishmen in Berkeley yesterday.

From their "public editor" we get this a few minutes ago :

"Valid Complaints On Story About Berkeley Balcony Collapse"

From the soriroty girl's article :
"My office fielded hundreds of complaints Wednesday from readers who are – quite understandably – upset about an article that went online Tuesday night.

"The article concerns a terrible balcony collapse in Berkeley, Calif., that killed young people from Ireland, working in the United States as part of the J-1 visa program.

"The complaints center on descriptions of the program as “not just a source of aspiration, but a source of embarrassment for Ireland, marked by a series of high-profile episodes involving drunken partying and the wrecking of apartments in places like San Francisco and Santa Barbara.”

There are over 170 reader comments to the article linked above right now (at about midnight on Wed-Thur 17-18 June, 2015).

I wonder how many of them will discuss the blatant, and obviously racist aspect to this story.

The New York Times: "Bad Yesterday, They'll Be Worse Tomorrow"

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

World Map of U.S. Foreign Assistance

What is wrong with this picture ?

Answer: no white countries on the list. 

Seems like the less white a country, the more gubment cheese they get from the United States.

Oh wait, Israel tops the list !

Oh well.

U.S. Foreign Assistance Map