Cheering on the Demise of the West As We Race to the Edge of the Cliff of Civilizational Oblivion

The Arena Culture, by David Brooks, was published on the last day of 2010 in the OpEd section of the New York Times.

The Times just had to slip in one last little bit of post-Western, NWO wishful thinking before the start of another exciting year of historical relativism.

From the article :

"But occasionally brave philosophers do leap out of their professional lanes and illuminate things for the wider public. Hubert Dreyfus of Berkeley and Sean Dorrance Kelly of Harvard have just done this with their new book, “All Things Shining.” They take a smart, sweeping run through the history of Western philosophy. But their book is important for the way it illuminates life today and for the controversial advice it offers on how to live." 

Times Communist David Brooks 

It's almost like Brooks here is slapping his fellow liberal elitists on the back, saying "Job well done mates, we've really pulled the wool over their eyes." At the same time, Krugman seems to imply in this yet-another NYT anti-Western puff piece that sneers haughtily at the (I-agree) stupidity of Western celebrity worship and team-sports adulation, that the secularism brought about in Europe and the Rest of the West is a good thing, a suggestion which not-so-thinly veils the further implication that the West needs to Step Aside.

Of course, the glaring omission in this disgusting mind-twister of an opinion piece is the truth that non-Western peoples - particularly Muslims - are more religified today than they have ever been, and that a lot of this new religious fervour in the Turd World is the result of a global social justice agenda perpetrated by the self-haters at elitist policy-making institutions like America's newspaper of record.

The West has lost its religion, and the munts of the Turd World have found theirs, and the NYT - while sneering at religiosity as long as it is practiced by Judeo-Christians - is on a campaign to demonstrate how noble it is when the unenlightened noble savages of the Earth are themselves firmly rooted in their religious belief, a lot of which is downright Dark Ages-backward.

In other words: Krugman is delighted that the West is rudderless, lost, and in love with giant savages with barely legible tattoos on their dark biceps mindlessly chucking an inflatable ball over long distances of shellacked basketball court.

It brings to mind the question - and this is slightly out of context - "Does lack of pain imply pleasure?"

In this case in particular, "pain" is the gradual destruction of all that one holds dear, through dark and nefarious forces difficult to pinpoint, in our case the decline of the West at the hand of evil do-gooder white liberals who have not yet grasped the fact that their own kind are the most morally righteous and motivated on earth, and that of non-whites, who if they had the power that whites have had for a couple hundred of years would no doubt be a thousand times less moral and missionary in their zeal than non-whites.

It's all so effing sad, sometimes I want to just give up. How could the smartest people in America so willfully and fervently be advocating the demise of the very civilization that produced every single innovation in the modern world - EVERY, SINGLE, ONE, without exception? How is it possible for a civilization to survive if the intellectual elites continue to cheer on the losers, begging for conditions that facilitate the fertility of the stupid, while sneering at and condemning at every turn the ancestors of the inventors of light, flight, the internet, and indeed the very liberalism that sends do-gooder white liberal missionaries (read: "Peace Corps") to the heart of the jungle to improve the lives of proto-humanids stuck in the Stone Age?

Yee, COTT reader, I ask you this.

All answers are welcome, because we are thoroughly mind-boggled by the doings of the Euro-bashers at  America's newspaper of record.

As they say in French: "Toutes les idées sont les bienvenues!"

A Refreshingly Honest Critique of Islamic Ridiculousness, But With a Condition

Check out this interesting article published on the front page of America's newspaper of record, entitled "Reshaping of Mecca Turns to Gargantuan Glitz" and written by Times architecture critic Nicolai Ouroussoff.

What astounded me when I started reading this piece was that the New York Times would dare use such words as "kitsch," "grotesque," and "cynical" in the first paragraphs of an article discussing Muslims.

But you will see that it turns out to be too good to be true: the crypto-neurotic reality fugitives at the Times just could not bring themselves to publish an article ragging exclusively on a thoroughly ridiculous civilization without throwing in a little social justice propaganda.

From the article:

"But the Vegas-like aura of these projects can deflect attention from the real crime: the way the developments are deforming what by all accounts was a fairly diverse and unstratified city." 

It almost feels like the loons at the Times included the social justice angle mid-article to atone for the honesty with which they report on Saudia Arabia's childlike excesses in Mecca, using money obtained from Westerners to hire Westerner to design buildings off-limits to Westerners.

Big-Ben, Arab-Style: Not Approved by NYT, But Only Because Off-Limits
To The Poor

Exalting Post-Westernism: Tricky Nick Does it Again

Nicholas Kristof is one silly little leftist. He takes the Times' creed of comforting the afflicted to a new level of auto-flagellation with every new column he publishes.

In today's Op-Ed section, Nick confirms his commitment to all things non-Western with a piece entitled "First Learn Spanish. Then Study Chinese." The title of the article is actually in the Spanish and Chinese translations - including with Chinese characters - but I'm afraid that I have a hard enough time pressing one for English, no Espagnol on COTT por favor.

From the article:

"Spanish may not be as prestigious as Mandarin, but it's an everyday presence in the United States - and will become even more so. Hispanics made up 16 percent of America's population in 2009, but that is forecast to surge to 29 percent by 2050, according to estimates by the Pew Research Center." 

As we saw in the post below, "Official Charter of Population Replacement," the Mexicans and the Chinese absolutely despise each other; it seems the only one who feels the love are goofy grinning liberal loons like Kristof who are too delusional to realize that when whites become a minority in the US - a milestone these freaks are cheering on with astonishing frenzy - it is their children who will pay the price.

Since rarely does one see a person who shifts from conservative to liberal (for reasons we will examine in an upcoming post, it's always the other way around), the only thing we can hope for is that the children of these elitist leftist policy-influencers will come to see the light, and stand up for the past and future of Western exceptionalism.

Also from the article:

"China will probably be the world's largest economy within our children's lifetimes and a monumental force in every dimension of life. Studying Chinese gives you insight into one of the world's great civilizations..." 

Sorry Nick but the Chinese suck, China is a filthy third world hell hole that since 2008 is the biggest polluters in the world, the garbage they produce is toxic and inferior, they have contributed virtually nothing to modern civlization, they are incapable of original thought, and most importantly (for the purposes of this blog), their current existence would be impossible as they know it without Western Civilization having laid the groundwork of every single innovation on which the modern world is based.

Gaaaawd!

The New York Times Publishes the Official Charter for Population Replacement...

And it can be divined from quotes such as this: 

"It's not our church anymore, that's the way we feel," said Oswaldo Nieves, 70, a Puerto Rican who has attended the Latino church for eight years. "They are eliminating us slowly, slowly." 

We have seen before how the psychopathic marxist wordsmiths at the New York Times sneer at Christianity from their lofty perch of "afflicting the comfortable, and comforting the afflicted," except when allegiance to it can be used to make a beloved minority group look good. 

Such is the case in a population replacement propaganda puff piece printed on the front page of today's national edition, seditiously entitled "A Bitter Divide As Immigrants Share a Church."

Times-Approved

Since This Article Makes Immigrants Look Pious,
No Need to Mention the Church Abuse Scandal

Faces of America (According Not To The Census, But To The Population-Replacement Enthusiasts at America's Newspaper of Record)

The three photos proudly reprinted without permission below were published on page A10 of the National section of today's New York Times. They are the only photos published on that page. They accompany three different articles: one about record cold in Miami; the other about Muslim women in the United States (the object of the COTT post below this one); and the last in an article about how Justice Sotomayor sets the Supreme Court's liberal standard ("Sotomayor Guides Court's Liberal Wing"). 

I wish we could say that it's not everyday that the cultural demagogues at the NYT cram an entire page full of nothing but anti-Western, pro-minority propaganda, but as page A10 makes clear today, this is an all too common occurrence. 

These photos are of course noteworthy for the diversity they portray - except for the image of Chief Jutsice Roberts, for whom the Times reserves a sneering contempt worthy of Biblical wrath. 

It gets amusing with the way the reality-shapeshifting elites at the Grey Lady have deceptively captioned the last photo reprinted below, which was used to illustrate a story entitled "South Florida at Play - Sun, Sand and Chill." 

Of course when we first saw this photo, published three days after Christmas, of a group of "beachgoers" in Miami, we could not help but notice that the trio was most decidedly not related to Jerry Seinfeld or his retiree parents. Clearly the New York Times decided to publish this photo for a reason?, we asked. 

Then, as we read the caption, we realized that perhaps there was hope after all for the psychopaths at the New York Times. For the caption starts like this: "Sepehr Ardebimian, with his mother, Sholeh, and sister, Parastou, who were on a visit to Miami Beach..." ...Ahhh, we started to think (before reading to the end), it's not so bad after all, quite innocent really: the New York Times we know has to publish photos of people with unpronounceable names, but at least in this case, they are reporting on a family of unpronounceables visiting from some noble exotic third world land. They could have shown a photo of some Jersey Jews visiting, or even some Cuban Americans, but instead they chose to go full-on exotic and publish a picture of a family visiting from a country where a name like "Parastou" rolls off the tongue like "Arnold."

Ahh, sometimes you have to give the New York Times credit, we thought. 

But then, we read to the end of the caption, and realize this exotic trio were: 

"...on a visit to Miami Beach from Georgia, [to] endure the uncharacteristically brisk winds and temperatures."

(SOUND OF TIRES SCREECHING TO A HALT!)

Georgia?! 

Precisely. 

The mind-vlokking knows no end at America's newspaper of record. They want you to think, first, that this exotic-sounding family is from Georgia, as in the Southern State of Georgia. 

But then they want you to have your doubts, and wonder if they really mean "Georgia," as in the country next door to Russia, Georgia. Tsk tsk, how could you be so xenophobic?, you unenlightened bigot. 

The Times doesn't really make clear whether these people are from Georgia the state, or Georgia the country. Naturally, the ambiguity is intentional. (Though of course we all know that they are most likely refugees living in public housing in Atlanta). 

Actually, a quick Google search reveals that the name "Parastou" is Iranian (Google it yourself and see what appears). What this means is that there is an extremely high likelihood that these "Miami beachgoers" are in fact Iranian asylum seekers, no doubt already resettled by the State Department in that land of milk and honey, and living the high life (winter trips to Miami, yeah!) at taxpayer expense. 

A quick visit to the State Department's Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Refugee Resettlement (Administration for Childrens' Families), reveals that in fiscal year 2009, 90 Iranians (and 400 Iraqis) were resettled in Georgia alone (throughout the US last year, 5,374 Iranians, and over 18,000 Iraqis were granted refugee status in United States, which means that the warm coats you see in the picture below were probably paid for by the American taxpayer (as was no doubt airfare, rent, food, even the expenses for the Miami Beach romp trip, etc)). [Please go here to learn more about the scandal that is State Department-sponsored asylum abuse]. 

Therefore, we have the New York Times, on the first page of their National Section, three days after Christmas 2010,  printing three photos that portray seven different people (half of whom are depicted in a weather-related article), and the breakdown is as follows: One Adult White Female (barely visible); One Adult White Male; Three Adult Minority Women; Two Minority Children. 

Of the minorities, one is Hispanic, and the rest - 60% of the total - are Muslim. 

Why Is My Maid Dressed Up Like Hillary Clinton? 

 The Pensive, Noble Muslim Woman,
and Her Unenlightened, Self-Hating Bimbo Pupil
Out of Focus in the Foreground

From Iran to Georgia (the State, not the Country): 
Gifts of the State Department  

Women of Islam: The New York Times is Living in a World of Absolute Make-Believe

In light of the video posted below, wherein thousands of Muslim men chanting "Allah Akbar" are seen to gather for Friday prayers in an illegal occupation of the streets of a Paris neighborhood located just a few hundred meters from one of the most visited tourist attractions on earth, the Sacré Coeur Basilica, we thought it would be fun to expose how the New York Times reports on the Religion of Peace.

Conditionally Approved by the NYT

In an article oozing with minority worship published on page A10 of today's national edition and entitled "Life in U.S. Brings Success and Visibility for Muslim Women," crypto-delusional Times communist and reality bandit Brian Knowlton sneers at the infidels while rolling out the shag prayer rug for the Women of Islam.

[Before we get into the real couscous of this brand-new travesty of reality by America's newspaper of record, we should point out the curious habit the NYT seems to have when it comes to entitling their articles: often we find that the original print article, when reproduced word for word in nytimes.com, is given a slightly different title. For example, the article being discussed here is entitled "Muslim Women Gain Higher Profile in U.S." on the Times' web site, while in today's print edition it's "Life in U.S. Brings ...". It might be nothing, and not as I suspect an attempt to tone down the propaganda in the more lasting online version of the article. But the New York Times is such an incredibly devious and dishonest newspaper, inserting at every opportunity the most insidious propaganda into their reporting, that I am suspicious of their every move.]

The New York Times wants you to believe that Muslim women are 100% exactly the same as any other group of women anywhere in the world, and especially that the women of Islam are interchangeable with the Brigitte Bardots and the Marilyn Monroes of the West, that the only thing that makes them different are a silly little head covering. Consider this stunner from the article:

"Mrs. Khalifa, who was born in Egypt and raised in Texas, has degrees in chemistry and human resources. She began wearing a head-scarf in her mid-30s. ... At first, people looked at her "like I was different, Muslim, un-American, stupid." ... Today, though, she is one of a type now found in most sizable American cities: vocal Muslim women wary of the predominantly male leadership of their community and increasingly weary of non-Muslims' suspicions about Islam." 

Translation: Mrs. Khalifa is uncomfortable ("wary") with that pesky habit Islam has of treating women like chattel, and downright sick and tired ("weary") of the stupid American bigots whom the NYT cannot seem to enlighten fast enough as to the joys of diversity.

A Stone's Throw From the Sacré Coeur in Paris, Thousands of Muslims Illegally Block the Streets to Pray As City Authorities Look On And Do Nothing

And this in the land of the original separation of church and state, 1905.

Don't expect the New York Times to be reporting on this any time soon.



Note the total absence of women in this quaint little scene.

Need Pushes Pakistani Women Into Jobs and Peril

The Freakazoids at America's newspaper of record want you to believe that the women of Pakistan are exactly like the women of, say, New Jersey or Montana - totally interchangeable, exactly the same lot, if only the stone-agers who rule over them (the Paki men) with a heavy leather belt would just embrace the modern world.

One-world wishful thinking surely is the realm of the delusional.

Check this article out if you think I am making this stuff up:

"Necessity Pushes Pakistani Women Into Jobs and Peril"

Exact Same Thing As Chicks From Jersey, According to the NYT

Explaining Liberalism - The Safe Place to Be, the New (Establishment) Anti-Establishment

Remember the Subarus with the "Question Authority" bumperstickers you saw in the streets of America in the 1980s?

One-world liberal denialism is the default position among the intellectually weak and cowardly today: it is the safe place to be, sans risk or attendant tribulations of any kind, a warm and fuzzy place where the majority of the Western elite will back you up and defend you, despite reality squealing hysterically from the other corner of the ring, begging you to see the truth about how God created his many creatures with vastly differing degrees of competence.

Adhering to the prevailing Liberal Dogma means that your job is safe and your friendship with your NFL-watching white neighbours is not at risk; despite being a fundamentally dishonest and wrongheaded ideology, it is the safe place to be for most of humanity. It is the redoubt of the intellectually weak and lazy, a safe haven from which to see no evil, hear no evil, be no evil.

Like the deluded children who affixed "Question Authority" bumperstickers to their Subaru pickups in the 1970s, the Huff-post reading practitioners of the Religion of Liberalism today think incorrectly that they are the true dissidents, the true rebels; whereas, in fact, Anti-Establishment has become the new Establishment.

One need look no further than the election of the Fraudulent One to realize that reality has been turned on its head in the new, post-Western, post-Euro New World.

The silly white children with dreadlocks and self-mutilating tattoos à la Angelina Jolies and Bonos of the world fail to see that their devotion to a supposedly non-conformist creed is actually the ultimate form of conformism, little more than an establishment-inspired hatred for their own kind. The ultimate stupidity, in a word. It is a sick, sickly, and sickening form of anti-Western self-denialism, perpetrated en masse by the social engineering elites that are a thousand times more intelligent than most Westerners, and a billion times more intelligent than those non-Westerners programmed through relentless Euro-based propaganda to hate the very inventors of electricity, flight, the telephone, and the other modern conveniences which gave the People Without The Wheel the means by which to scoff at their distant benefactors.

Modern-day, post-1960s Global Egalitarian Liberalism is the default position for the weak-willed and the intellectually lazy; it is the easy place to go in a would-be global society where every single modern innovation - EVERY ONE, for heaven's sake - is the product of the mind of a hated dead white male from Europe. The stupidity that ensues from such an agenda is breathtaking: it is the myth of the noble savage run amok, to apocalyptic effect.

When it comes to historical revisionism and non-white bias today, it is safe to say that never in the history of mankind has such mass insanity prevailed; the anti-Western phenomenon that is sweeping the planet is the work of dark and sinister forces who have an agenda that does not even register on the Richter Scale of global conspiracies. (BTW, Richter was not an African, or a Chinaman, or a practitioner of the Religion of Peace : Charles Francis Richter was a white European male).

Liberalism is the default position of intellectual discourse today. Think about it: the mainstream elite has made it such that to NOT embrace the liberal credo will likely result for whoever dare not embrace it in professional termination, hate-crime prosecution, and the like. Look at what happened to Dr. James Watson, one small example among countless examples.

(continued shortly)

More Lionizing of the Lowest of the Low : " Daddy Read to Me"

Today we have a good example of the New York Times' devotion to their mission of always, always  portraying minorities in the warm glow of approval that can only come from a diseased mind, in a stomach churning puff piece excreted by Times communist Fernando Santos, and barfingly entitled "Daddy Read to Me."

Seriously, does the insanity have no limit?

In this article published on the day after Christmas on page A18 of today's national edition in the New York section, and occupying the entire page (!), the Times breathlessly tells the story of a series of sperm-donor Latinos (and a token black) incarcerated at Riker's Island, and their participation in a "literacy program" called "Daddy and Me" wherein the inmates are recorded reading children's books so that their illegitimate children (the ones they know about, anyway) can listen to their voices in the comfort of their mammys' public housing units.

He Mugged Your Neighbours, But the Times is
Cool WIth That

From the article:

"Since then, he [inmate Rasado] has been in and out of prison, mostly for assault; on May 29, he was arrested on Staten Island with a gun in his backpack. When asked where he grew up, Mr. Reddick said, “Right here,” meaning Rikers. He has three daughters: Mary Jane is 4, Ma’Naiya is 3, and Mya was born on Oct. 18."

Now, a responsible news organization would have at least commented on the criminal nature of these men and their ghastly patterns of fathering unwanted welfare dependents, but from the realty dodgers at the New York Times on this supremely important issue we hear not a peep. 

Instead, the Times writes about these inmates from a condescending platform of paternalistic moral superiority, perhaps not even realizing that they sound like they are talking about children when they print things like this: 

"For nearly a decade, Mr. Rosado has often spent 23 hours a day alone in a cell in the criminal justice system’s equivalent of “time out.”'

For the freakoids at America's newspaper of record, the real tragedy here is not that the United States has to pay to keep 2.3 million other men like Rosado behind bars, as well as many million more of their criminal spawn living on welfare in public housing until they can grow up to become criminals like papa; no, for the wishful thinking, disingenuous white liberals at the NYT, the real tragedy is that discrimination and the "disease" of drug addiction landed these scumbags in Rikers in the first place. Oh, that and the fact that bigoted Nazi assholes in Congress just struck down the Dream act, which would have allowed tens of millions of criminal Latinos more to soak into the already saturated fabric of American society. That, is the real tragedy, says the Grey Lady. But isn't it sweet that this cute reading program - dreamed up by social engineering elitists like themselves - gives the Times the opportunity to put words like "felony weapons possession" and "Cat in the Hat" in the same paragraph.

The New York Times: certifiably insane since 1981.

"Today is Christmas! Remember the Neediest!"

So says the New York Times with a green banner printed at the top of today's Christmas edition.

This phrase - "Remember the Neediest" - is the creed behind which the psychopathic cultural marxist reality dodgers at the NYT justify their massive propaganda campaign against the winners (the rich, Western Civilization), in favor of the losers (the poor, the third world, practitioners of the religion of peace, etc). The crazed nut-witts at the Times are very clear examples of the danger of excessive competitive altruism: they want so badly for the halo atop their pointy heads to shine that they lay to waste the common sense of the morality they claim to espouse.

Sometimes exposing the criminal liberal bias of America's newspaper of record is a cinch, because they just make it so easy.

You Have to Read Between the Lies

Consider the content of today's Christmas edition: in addition to the appeal for the needy (reasonable enough, right?) evidence abounds from Page One of the Times' sickeningly subversive agenda. Just look at the photos the Times decided to print on today's front page: a large picture of a family of Kenyans (no father in sight) studying by solar-panel light; a medium-sized pic of a mestizo child dressed for church in Queens; and a small picture of two elderly Jewish couples.

If you were thinking "WTF," our reply would be: "Yes, precisely."

Please allow us geniuses here at COTT to analyze the rather insidious message(s) behind the crazy content of today's NYT front page.

First of all, the size of the photos you see on the front page of the NYT as pictured above is representative today of the relevance  the NYT attributes to each subject. Therefore, in the article lovingly entitled "African Huts Far From the Grid Glow With Renewable Power" (from NYT series "Beyond Fossil Fuels"), we have the largest photo on the whole page, and the New York Times telling the story of a village in Kenya that is worthy of the highest form of praise and attention because this village of Stone Agers is nobly and courageously using cheap Chinese-made solar panels to light up their mud huts and recharge their sail phones. You see, there is nothing more thrilling to the twisted minds at the Grey Lady than when an opportunity to show you how non-racist they are is made even better by the chance to talk about how committed they are to climate change (all the while hinting ever so subtly that your ancestors are to blame for holding back the kind-hearted noble savages of the dark continent, yes, and for global warming, too).

From the article:

"My main motivation was [being able to charge] the phone, but this has changed so many other things," said Ms. Ruto one recent evening as she relaxed on a bench in the mud-walled shack she shares with her husband and her six children." 

(SOUND OF TIRES SCREECHING TO A STOP)

Six children? In a mud hut? And the New York Times is talking about cell phone chargers?

Now, in a sane society, an honest newspaper that was not muzzled by the strictures of political politeness would have devoted the rest of the article not to the frivolous pursuit of clean energy in parts of the planet still living in the Stone Age, but to the scary scary reality of the sky-high birthrates of a billion people too stupid to figure out how to feed themselves.

For the Do-Gooder Holier-Than-Thou Liberals at the
New York Times, This Primitive Kenyan Represents All
That Is Holy And Good in the Fight Against Global Warming 

Africa's demographic incontinence is far and away a billion times more of a crisis than the "heat-trapping gases" they love to pontificate about, but the New York Times does not want you to even think about the looming Global Population Disaster, which is a ghastly, gargantuan Malthusian nightmare-in-waiting, wherein the Africans themselves have the most to lose and will be the first to suffer from it, but the NYT is too busy buffing their own halo to report the truth in this area. Instead, they print stupid, sophomoric do-gooder articles on human uplift that suggest that the noble poor of Africa are finally enlightened enough to embrace progressive causes and emerge from the misery that your racism (and the racism of your evil ancestors) has put them in.

When I first saw the front page of today's New York Times, I immediately knew that something dark and sinister was afoot: further reading confirmed this.

Why would the NYT print the photo of two elderly heterosexual married couples on the front page of their Christmas Day edition?

The NYT never, ever publishes a story that depicts normal married people in a positive light; the reason that they did so today - Christmas Day - is that the married couple in question are ancient, soon to be dead relics of a society that the psychopaths at the Grey Lady cannot  wait to see disappeared.

Don't you get it?

The New York Times wants you to be gone, so that the less fortunate, the dispossessed, those who historically have been under the yoke of Western Exceptionalism can take over the reigns of Civilization.

The Times won't be happy until your kind and mine are no more, it is as sad and as simple as that.

Anti-Westernism, The New Opium Of The People: This Is The Mother Of All Conspiracy Theories, And Propaganda Institutions Like The NYT Keep It Alive

Something dark and deeply sinister is afoot.

How many here have seen the film "Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle"?

Please look into it. Better still, look into the way the NYT reports on this movie, wherein all the White people are freaks, deviants, bigots and idiots, and the Paki and Asian heroes are the Future.

The New York Times, Liberal NWO Dogmatism, and Subversive Dishonesty in Matters of Reporting on Climate Change: It's Their Way or the Highway

A gigantic climate change propaganda puff piece  entitled "A Scientist, His Work and a Reckoning" was published on the front page of today's newspaper of record; after the above-the-fold intro, it went on to occupy a full center page spread on page A11 of the national section.

Now, this was actually a very interesting article: it told the story of scientist Dr. Charles Keeling, who despite being a white male (and a registered Republican to boot) the NYT is in love with because he came up in the 1950s with a machine that could measure carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

A laudable enough achievement in its own right; however, the problem with the way the Times reports about this CO2-measurement machine, is multi-fold.

Climate change and climate science is by its nature an inexact one: no solid consensus exists among "experts" as to where exactly we stand in terms of the fluctuations of the Earth's natural cold/hot cycles.

Everybody sees that it is colder right now in London than it has been in a really long time; the MSM reports as frequently and as fervently on climate anomalies as they do on white-on-minority crime (cf: Oakland transit police killer), all the while pushing the anti-development, anti-Western agenda that is "climate change."

In other words, the elitist social-engineering four-eyed reality fugitives at such hack mainstream publikations as the NYT want you to believe that Climate Change is real, and though we at COTT agree that it might well be, what we object to is the fact that the freakoids at the Times really want you to believe the following :

[A] Western Civilization is inherently to blame in any Climate Change discussion, seeing as how after all the Industrial Revolution started in England;

[B] Even though the disgusting Chinese became bigger emitters of pollution and other crap into the atmosphere two years ago, the people behind world development as it stands today (Westerners) are really responsible for all the damage inflicted on the planet by "progress";

[C] Therefore, the West must depopulate, so that the less fortunate may thrive.

Bashing the Catholic Church Except When Using Allegiance to It Makes Latino Immigrants Look Good

The New York Times just won't let this one go: 

Over 1600 References to "Church Abuse Scandal" in less than a Month! 

On page A13 of the national section, the four-eyed psychos at the NYT published an article today entitled: "Pope Says Sexual Scandal Hit an Unimaginable Degree." We too thought that title sounded a little strange - it is the Times grasping at everything and anything they can to smear the Catholic Church. 

You see, the cult of liberalism is the new religion for the West in the wishful-thinking minds of the psychos at the Times: it needs to replace the dreaded opium of the people, Christianity. Of course, Islam is okay, but Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular will be sneered at by the repugnant elites at America's newspaper of record. 

What is even more sickening than this never-ending attack on the one institution that has done more for the good of human kind than any other over hundreds of years, is the sheer hypocrisy displayed by the Times when they use allegiance to it to promote their pro-immigration agenda.

Consider a few excerpts from this nauseating article, published on page A13 of today's national edition and entitled "After Dream Act Setback, Eyeing a Sleeping Giant":

"About 37 percent of Texas residents are of Hispanic origin, and the state has a long history of welcoming newcomers who work hard and obey the law. So the state would seem likely to support a bill to grant citizenship to thousands of foreign-born college students"  

Excuse me?  How low can the Times go? Even the crypto-delusional reality dodgers at the Grey Lady know that they are lying when they call illegal immigrants "foreign-born college students."And since when are illegal aliens a "Sleeping Giant?" Consider the double-entendre of using this phrase to describe Mexicans: They are giants, therefore noble and pure; and since they are sleeping, they are a formidable force to be reckoned with, one that will stamp down hard on the neck of the hated Euro-majority. That is what the Times is saying when they print such subversive words.

It is curious indeed, what this newspaper seems to be wishing for. "There is a lot of anger, disillusionment," the Times quotes one illegal alien Latino from Texas as saying, but then they are quick to point out that this criminal is the president of a Catholic organization in San Antonio that lobbied for the Dream Act.

You see, it's okay to bash Catholicism, rehashing no-longer-news stories about a horny priest from forty years ago, unless affiliation with it can be used to paint illegal Latinos in a positive light.

The hypocrisy at the New York Times is sickening. We fear that it is getting worse, too.

Ivory Coast: Exposing the New York Times for Their Lies Through Omission

We have seen before how the disingenuous white liberal hacks at America's newspaper of record engage in their sinister campaign of journalistic disinformation as much by what they report as by what they fail to report. Nowhere is this dishonesty more glaring than in Times news reports focusing on Africa or Haiti (or test scores, or the gay agenda, or immigration or... you get the idea).

The Ivory Coast is another of those "troubled" African nations that the NYT reports on with paternalistic pity: it was once the "crown jewel" in France's empire of West African colonies, and up until recently the world's top cocoa exporter. Elections were held in this quaint little country late last month, and the European Union, the United States and the African Union all agreed that the winner was the challenger to the country's current prez, Laurent Gbagbo, a.k.a., this guy :

Laurent Gbago: Not A Muslim, Therefore
Not Times-Approved

What the Times conveniently fails to mention is that their decision to stand behind this dictator - no better or worse than your garden variety African plutocrat - is part of a far larger agenda to uplift global minorities everywhere, and Muslims in particular. In the same way that the Times uplifted the Muslims in the Balkans conflict, in the case of Ivory Coast they are publicly and rather pathetically making the tired old case once again that the only reason that Côte d'Ivoire is such a dank shite hole is because of a tiny handful of corrupt leaders, and if only those evil politicians would step aside and let the democratically elected true leaders take over, then everything would be rose. 

Once again, there is a lot more to the story than the Times wants you to know. 

Chaos In Ivory Coast: It's Okay As Long As the New
Headhunters are Muslim, Says the Times

The New York Times: predictably  misleading since 1964.

Take A Close Look At This Picture

This is a very interesting picture. Please look at it closely. It was published in Saturday's edition of the New York Times national section, page A10, at the top of a page that included three unrelated articles (commented upon below); unaccompanied by an article of its own, the picture is captioned to tell readers that the Fraudulent One is reading to public school children from his book "Of Thee I Sing."

Why would the New York Times publish a photo of a roomful of schoolchildren practically mocking the president by their disinterest?

It is and will forever be impossible to view a photo of the president of the United States in a classroom full of young children without the memory of George Bush and his pet goat leaping to mind. Therefore, the Times' decision to publish this photo is obviously reeking of a most subversive form of cynicism.

For the puppet masters behind the propaganda machine that is the Western World Media, no photo is ever Left Behind, and nothing appears in print by accident: every comma is a carefully manipulated tool in a vast campaign to program impressionable minds into swallowing hook line and semi-colon the pre-packaged post-modern liberal world-view consensus, wherein the past is bad and the future is rosy ("past" being Western, "future" being non-Western).

Look at the photo again, please. Why would America's newspaper of record appear to laugh at the foreign-born Messiah they helped put into office with this picture?

From left to right, we have an Asian-looking little girl daydreaming; a Mestizo girl glaring contemplatively - and questioningly - at Obama; an Asian-Hispanic-looking boy daydreaming and clearly uninterested in what the Fraudulent One is talking about; a dark-haired little Mexican girl intent on pulling some buggers out of her nose; and the lone Caucasion in the photo, pensive but unfocused on the prez.

Why would the Times print this pic, and not one of a room full of smiling, adoring young fans?

Answer: the New York Times understands that their credibility - their own legitimacy, even - is on the line. The communists at the Grey Lady understand that the people have seen through the Hoax and Change, and that if they are to appear to have even a tiny fragment of the journalistic integrity that supposedly is the bedrock behind the motto "All the News that's Print to Fit," then they need to publish signs of the prevailing public mood from time to time.

Of course such a thought is so distasteful to the reality fugitives at the New York Times, that it was out of the question that they publish a photograph of, say, a Tea Party rally, to demonstrate Obama's declining popularity.

Instead, they went with a classroom full of mostly non-white public school kids, in which the only kid who appears to be aware of what's going, is a... Latino.

We can just imagine the meeting of the Times' Editorial Board on the upper floors of their 8th Avenue skyscraper where the decision to publish this photo was made: a meeting of intensely perverted minds, struggling to find a way to contort reality to their sick agenda.

Instead of the original caption, the crypto-psychotic shape shifters at the New York Times could have printed: "America's Future Looks On In Dismay as the Dear Leader Fails to Bring About the Change He Promised Swiftly Enough (Hobbled As He Is By The Evil Right-Wingers Who Fail To Be Enlightened)."  

Delusional, Wishful-Thinking, Morally Superior Liberalism: Laying it on with a Trowel

Today was a busy day for the cultural marxist puppet masters at America's newspaper of record: from the first page of the national section to the last column of the Arts Section, the Saturday December 18th, MMX edition of the New York Times was filled with more subversive anti-Western propaganda than we have seen in a while.

Perhaps it is the onset of Christmas, and the aftermath of a return to the right of the political pendulum that has the communists at the Grey Lady attempting ever more fervently to impose their agenda through twisted reporting. Or perhaps we are just paying closer attention.

Like a caged animal that has nothing more to lose, the soon-to-be obsolete New York Times lashes out ever more violently against common sense (or in many cases, decency), publishing in today's edition alone the three diddies chronicled below:

"Lesbian Coach Exits, and College Struggles with Image" (p.A10);

"Bill to Grant Legal Status to Immigrant Students Heads to a Vote in the Senate" (p.A10);

"Captain Beefheart, Artist in Rock and Oils, Dies at 69" (p. A17).

I Don't Think It Can Get Much Creepier 

The Photo That Appears Directly Above the Article: "Swedes Still Committed to Diversity & Tolerance" (not printed: "Even Though everyone, Including Angela Merkel, Knows That Multiculturalism Has Utterly Failed In the West")

Muslim Asylum Seekers from Iraq and Iran Tragically Lose Their Bid to
Cash in on the Generous Welfare Benefits that
Lured Them in After Australia's Labor Government Under
Julia Gillard Struck Down Anti-Boat People Laws 

Shocking Anti-French Racism, Anti-Secularism in the Streets of Paris

Prière en pleine rue: la laïcité remise en cause à Paris
Uploaded by Chevalier-Bayard. - Up-to-the minute news videos.

Beating the Truth Over the Head With a Very Large Stick

In yet another attempt to pull the wool over Westerners' eyes on the touchy subject of the religion of peace and its sore-thumb status in those welcoming lands where Mohamed is lionized but the local cult is derided as quackery, the New York Times published on page A18 of today's national edition this devious little article, sickeningly entitled "Swedes Vow to Remain Tolerant After Suicide Attack."

It is funny the way this article was published - possibly by mistake - right below a photo of a boatload of Muslim asylum seekers being thrashed about in rough waters off the coast of Christmas Island (Gasp!), Australia. The Times wants you to believe that non-Western immigration and the population replacement agenda that drives it is a net plus for those countries where too many people remain unenlightened, and where the joys of non-Christian third world diversity need to be imposed.

In this latest anti-Western propaganda puff piece, Times communist and contributing reality dodger Kevin Burns, reporting out of Stockholm, bends over backwards to assuage concerns over the presence of half a million non-Swedish Muslims (80% of them foreign born) that bedeck that quaint little Scandinavian country with the glorious joys of diversity. Burns' article begins with this rather stunning image:

"As they consider the suicide bombing that recently rocked their country, many Swedes have taken comfort from the attack's most enduring image, as captured by a security camera: a man in a red jacket kneeling beside the bomber, asking if there was anything he could do for the man while other bystanders, spying unexploded pipe bombs still strapped to the man's waist, backed away, shouting 'Bomb! Bomb! Bomb!'."

In other words, Burns is relieved that Swedes continue to be reliably gullible when it comes to the foreigners that they coddle like prized little tolerance trophies, even though these trophies - as evidenced by the self-exploded Jihadi splayed on Stockholm's streets Saturday - would if given the chance auto-detonate, taking as many hated infidels with them as possible. That Burns does not even begin to condemn this sickening act of suicide bombing, or the evil ideology that makes it a daily occurrence among the practitioners of the religion of peace, tells us very clearly whose side this self-hating cultural marxist is on.

Burns cheers on the stupidity of the Swedish people, practically slapping himself on the back as he ventures out into the streets of Stockholm to interview people about the Saturday suicide bombing. In a telling display of Burns' total lack of partiality and unabashed agenda-pushing, he finds three people to interview on the streets. Two of them are Muslims, and one is a brainwashed 55 year-old white guy who says: "Should we shut the door [on immigrants]? Absolutely not. We have benefited far too much from the foreigners who have come here to do anything like that."

Oh really?

And, um, how, exactly? Like this, perhaps? :



The New York Times is a disgusting newspaper, with a sinister, evil agenda behind its biased reporting. The self-loathing lunatics at America's newspaper of record just won't be happy until the West are made to pay for their crime of making every civilization in human history (save a few) look unaccomplished in comparison.

The good news is that more and more people are waking up to the conspiracy that the elites have been perpetuating since the pendulum of popular sentiment swung to their side after World War Two and all the unfortunate atrocities that went down in that monster genocide-fest (of the 60 million people killed in WW2, 95% were European, at a time when whites made up roughly one third of global population. The percentage of Europeans as part of global population has been plummeting ever since, to less than 8% today).

The New York Times: sneering at all things Western since 1851.

Suspect in Swedish Bombings Struggled to Find Place in Society

Nothing to see here folks, please move along. So says the Times in this article, published two days after a sorta-Western looking Iraqi-born refugee P.O.S. who along with his family was welcomed in to the liberal paradise of Sweden in the early 1990s, right around the time that the scourge of Third World asylum immigration was reaching peak levels in the US (see post below for chart). I am so sick of these Muslim names that I will not bother trying to get the spelling right on the name of this thank-Allah now made good Jihadi, who was too stupid - as a lot of these practitioners of peace seem to be - to make his nail-bomb work right in downtown Stockholm at the height of the Christmas shopping season.

According to the cultural marxists at the Grey Lady, the problem is not the 82,000 Iraqi-born "refugees' that have swarmed into Sweden since 1990, it is obviously the people of the host country, who are too insensitive, too intolerant, and just plain too Swedish to treat their Muslim guests with sufficient benevolence.

Jihad in Stockholm: Of Course for the NYT The Real Casualty is Diversity

From the Op-Ed Pages of America's newspaper of record, published on December 13th, this article: 

Sweden’s Near Miss

"No country is immune from terrorism in today’s world, not even Sweden, with its unusually open society, traditional commitment to peace and wariness of military alliances.

On Saturday night, Stockholm had a narrow brush with catastrophe when a man tentatively identified as an Iraqi-born Swede (who had studied in Britain) detonated an explosives-laden car on a busy downtown street at the height of the Christmas shopping season. As in New York City’s Times Square seven months ago, hundreds of innocent bystanders might have been killed. Fortunately, the would-be terrorist was the only fatality.

The bomber appears to have acted alone, incensed by the publication of Swedish cartoons he considered blasphemous and the sufferings of fellow Muslims in Afghanistan, where 500 Swedish soldiers serve under NATO command.

Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt has responded in keeping with Sweden’s finest traditions. Denouncing the attacks as “unacceptable,” he urged Swedes to “stand up for tolerance,” not jump to premature conclusions and “let the justice system do its job.”

Mr. Reinfeldt’s firm and timely championing of traditional Swedish tolerance showed political courage. In elections three months ago, his center-right coalition fell short of an absolute majority as a result of alarming gains by the misleadingly named Sweden Democrats, an anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim party of the extreme right.

Center-right politicians elsewhere in Europe — France and the Netherlands, for example — have been quick to pander to similar xenophobic parties and their supporters. Mr. Reinfeldt declared defiantly on Monday that Sweden’s open society is worth defending. We couldn’t agree more."

Blame-Shifting and More Delusions About Islam

The NYT Claims that Jay-Z is the New Sinatra

In a certifiably insane Op-Ed column in the pages of the Sunday Times, America's newspaper of record wishful-thinkingly claims that Sinatra's noble successor is none-other than rap mogul Jay-Z.

Did the Times mention that the noble Jay-Z's latest smash hit contains the lyrics :


"If your having girl problems I feel bad for you son
I got 99 problems but a bitch ain't one"

Of course they didn't. 

The New York Times: rewriting history since 1851. 

Something Very Dark And Ominous Is Afoot: The New York Times Is An Engine of Evil in An Insidious Campaign of Anti-Western Propaganda

Ladies and Gentlemen: something very dark and ominous if afoot in the Western World. The secret agenda of the mainstream media is apparently a lot more sinister than we thought when we first started this blog barely one month ago.

It is starting to appear that The New York Times is up to something more dark, more evil, and more ominous than we had thought; the examples of America's newspaper of record crusading indefatigably in pursuit of undoing all the good that Western Civilization has brought upon the world are increasingly rampant, and cause for genuine alarm.

The mother of all conspiracy theories is occurring right before our eyes, with the Grey Lady clamoring for the demise of the West in every column inch that they print.

Today, Saturday December 11th, MMX, the Times outdid themselves in this most disgusting of suicidal rituals of civilizational demise by publishing not one, but TWO articles, extolling the degenerate art of a long-dead, aids-riddled junky homosexual who died in 1992, whose "art" is currently on display at a taxpayer-financed exhibit at a Smithsonian-affiliated institution, the National Portrait Gallery.

See article here: "As Ants Crawl On Crucifix, A Dead Artist Is Assailed Again," by Holland Cotter.

See more COTT commentary tomorrow. Right now we need to rest, in order to recover from the nauseau that reporting on the Crimes of the Times causes us.

Please check back tomorrow Sunday, when we will also comment on the Time's supine reaction to the Fraudulent One's abdication yesterday Friday, and the surreal moment that ensued, when the nation breathed a collective sigh of relief that a White Guy was once again in charge again in the WH :

The Nation Drew A Collective Sigh Of Relief, As the Fraudulent One
Yielded the Podium To A White Guy About Thirty IQ Points His Superior

Historical Revisionism in the Fine Arts Section

This is just unbelievable. From the article: 

"There aren't 1,000 inventions on display, but those that are, along with the ideas described, are meant to show that the Western Dark Ages were really a Golden Age of Islam." 

More Lies About Their Ancestors' Achievements

Wait! It gets wackier!! From the article:

" [the] Golden Age of Islam [lasted] a thousand years, in the show’s reckoning,  into the 17th century. During that era, the exhibition asserts, Muslim scientists and inventors, living in empires reaching from Spain to China, anticipated the innovations of the modern world."

What?

The New York Times will do anything to uplift Islam, from advocating for a victory mosque at ground zero to calling a Somali muslim immigrant who scammed the asylum system and then plotted to blow up the good white liberals of Portland an "Oregon Teen" to rewriting history to give underperforming groups  just as many accomplishments as our hated ancestors from hated Europe.

Oh my God, it gets even worse still. From the article:

"The exhibition [shows] Muslim culture rising out of a shadowy past to attain glories later misappropriated by Western epigones." 

I have to admit that I had to look up the word "epigone," but when I did I was hardly surprised by its definition ("an inferior imitator"). The Times wants you to believe that the West is a thieving, inferior civilization that is responsible for 99% of every single technological innovation in the modern world only because we achieved at the expense of others.

The Glories of Islam...

The New York Times: cheering on the losers since 1951.

...And the Lying, Cheating, Inferior Westerners
Who Stole their Thunder. 

Original article: A Golden Age in Science, Full of light and Shadow

Colleges See 16% Increase in Study of Sign Language

From Page A24 of Today's National Edition. Story Here. 

If it represents a shift away from Euro-anythingism, it's worth reporting. And as the figures in the table to the right reveal, even tiny shifts away from traditional study are deserving of the Times' focus. 

The New York Times: If It Ain't Broke, It Needs Breakin'. 

More Crybaby Whining Over Deported Criminals

Times communist and leading immigration reality fugitive Julia Preston presents us with a sniveling pro-invasion puff piece entitled "Illegal Immigrant Students Await Votes on Legal Status" on page A16 of today's national edition.

(more shortly...)

The New York Times Won't Publish This

The Times only publishes photos of Obama that make him look grandiose and messiah-like. Though we have our reservations about GW, at least the man looks presidential.

Published Yesterday in the Pages of the Times Style Magazine:

Three portraits of Times Heroes :

Waiting to See How The Times Gets This Story Wrong

A Firestorm Erupts on the Sun: December 6th, MMX
(from Nasa's SDO - Solar Dynamics Observatory) 

Cheering on the Decline of the West As Universities Promote Arabic and Chinese at the Expense of the Romance Languages

The bespectacled crypto-neurotic common-sense challenged reality fugitives at the New York Times love to publish breathless articles that triumphantly chronicle the decline of the "West," which is a code word for "European," which is a code word for "white," which is a code word for me, and probably whoever else is reading this brand new blog (though we welcome people of all backgrounds ;-) ).

How Dare They Be Proud of their Own Heritage ?
Force Them to Major in Arabic !

We have seen quite conclusively that the word-criminals at America's newspaper of record are a decidedly schadenfreude-prone bunch: they barely contain their glee when bad things happen to the West (read:  "The Man") as the WikiLeaks madness has clearly demonstrated (the Times reports that the take-home message from the WikiLeaks scandal is the reality of the overall decline of American influence and power in the world).

In an article published yesterday Sunday December 5th in the Grey Lady-Ghost, snidely entitled "Budget-Cutting Colleges Bid Some Language Adieu," Times communist Lisa W. Fodero (email her) reports on the current trend among state universities to eliminate European language study. Now, "State Universities" are implicitly government funded institutions, so when we have branches of the federal government proclaiming that European languages are no longer relevant (while 3rd world tongues such as Farsi and Arabic are), what we have here is state-sponsored cultural-replacement policy.

From Fodero's article :

“My argument wasn’t so much against this or that language,” Dr. Haass, a former State Department official, said in an interview. “But if we’re going to remain economically competitive and provide the skill and manpower for government, I think we need more Americans to learn Chinese or Hindi or Farsi or Portuguese or Korean or Arabic. In an ideal world, that wouldn’t mean fewer people would know Spanish, French, German and Italian. But in a real world, it might.”

If it weren't so sick it would be funny, the way the Times trumpets all things non-Western. We know and we have seen that the Times long ago eschewed the spirit of their journalistic mission of informing the public, in favor of promoting a misguided, competitive-altruism campaign wherein the "oppressed," minorities everywhere, the poor, etc. are uplifted and cast in a ridiculously biased glow of do-gooder liberalism.

It is becoming increasingly clear that the psychopaths at the New York Times are suicidal in their plot to uplift all those groups - worldwide -  which are historically underperforming, while at the same time constantly attacking and demeaning all those who have contributed more to civilization than any other.

The New York Times hates the rich; the NYT hates achievers; the NYT hates anyone with an IQ above 101, especially if that person is endowed with a "schleimpisch" (Yiddish).

And now, the New York Times hates French, German, and Latin.

In their place, the Times would rather see young people learning that languages not of Copernicus, not of Goethe, not of Sartre, not of Mozart, but instead of.... ....

Who?

Exactly.

The New York Times: "uplifting non-whites since 1851".