It feels almost like the four-eyed reality contortionists at Amerika's newspaper of record are laughing at the Little Man in America, inaudibly sneering at him, under his breath: "How could you be so stupid as to cum-swallow our blacks-worship and diversity propaganda in multiple gulps? To the point where the top two contenders for the American presidency today are Africans (americans)? Oy! We never thought we would get away with duping you this far, this long. You dumb, silly, pathetic little shmeckels."
Since Clarence "high-tech lynching" Thomas, The New York Times has taken a sick, rather imbalanced pleasure in pouncing upon black conservatives: it is their way of saying that they are truly morally superior, that their worldview is never bound by considerations of race or ethnicity; that they are infinitely more wise than the average man, because their wrath is reserved only for those on the right of the political spectrum, fully independent of considerations of hue (as if the two things could ever be amalgamated!).
To watch the diversity-enforcers at the New York Times take such glee in attacking the laughable pizza-chain guru Herman Cain, is to witness firsthand an exercise in abject hypocrisy. For the four-eyed freakazoids of forty-second street, this all is an exulted opportunity to buff the halo on their collective pointy heads.
Without the cajones to say it straight up, it is as though they are saying it out loud: "We, the morally superior One-Worlders at the New York Times, are so pure of heart and spirit, that Yes, we are capable of condemning a black man like Hermain Cain. Because he is of the right, and the right is wrong."
"Cain Says Perry Is Orchestrating Smear Campaign"
From the article :
|The NYT Photo Says It All|