 |
| 31 Oct MMXI - Clk 2 Enlrg |
The second large front page photo that merits closer inspection is of a group of rather diversity-enriched looking military men carrying a coffin. From the article, "Soldier's Death Raises Suspicions in Chinatown," we learn that there is a skinny Chinese serviceman inside. He shot himself in Afghanistan, but even though that bomb blast over the weekend killed more army guys than any afghanistan bomb in years, the New York Times thought it was more important to talk about some poor lone Chinese kid. Why? Answer: the Times had managed to sniff out potential bullying, complete with ethnic slurs no less, so that needed front-page treatment.
The third large photo on the front page of today's Time worthy of COTT focus is from the article "Elite Marathoner is Right at Home On The streets of New York". The New York Times loves it when they can call an ethnic Ethiopian a "New Yorker" (or a Somali-born jihadist asylum sponge an "American," as illustrated in "American Identified as Bomber in Attack on African Union in Somalia").
 |
| 24 Yr Old Ethiopian Who Might Win the NYC Marathon |
Last but not least, we conclude this exhibit of photos from the front page of today's Times, with a small photo, in the bottom left corner, from an article entitled "A Contentious Revival," which explains how rich whites are gentrifying poor Mexicans out of the cooler parts of downtown Santa Anna :
Sorry, I couldn't find the full-size photo that appears on the front page. It's a photo of some hot-looking blond chicks at some kind of party, and the caption reads : "Gentrification has created a battle for the soul of Santa Anna, California, pitting property owners and wealthy clients, like this crowd at a renovated theater, against poorer immigrants."
So let's resume today's front page :
Minority worship ? check
Minority worship? check
Minority worship? check
White privilege story? check
The New York Times: Defending and Supporting the Cockroaches of Humanity Since 1981
7 comments:
You really capture the essence of the hideousness that is the NYT. You deserve congratulations. It's almost as if you get the microbe under the microscope and reveal how it works to undermine a (once) healthy host. I myself stopped reading the times 20 years ago, because it started to make my skin crawl. You have pinpointed and clarified the horror of it. This is extremely valuable, and unusual - so many blogs are primarily ego trips. You should have a huge following. My suggestion is that you clean up the language a little so that more people will be comfortable about sending entries to others. Not that those who are so called don't deserve it, and not that it isn't often funny, but there are several people I can't send it to who should read it every day. Thanks for all your good work.
The article about the Ethiopian caught my eye when I was opening the paper yesterday to get to the crossword (the only reason I receive it any more).
Since when do we grant work visas (citizenship?) based soley on being a runner (or maybe it was her babysitting abilities that warranted it?)? Do we not have runners in this country?
"Minority worship"
Has it ever occurred to you that this is because these people whom you call 'minorities' are actually doing positive things?
Let me put it another way. How positive must a 'minority' person be before the NYT is allowed to say anything good about him/her, according to you? Or are you really saying that the NYT should NEVER say anything good about a 'minority' person?
Has it ever occurred to you that this is because these people whom you call 'minorities' are actually doing positive things?
No, because that isnt why they do it.
the vast majority of minorities (clumsy phrasing I know) contribute nothing of value the white population of the US. Just as they, the non-white majority, contribute little to what we regard as world civilisation.
Civilisation is a westren construct, it clearly doesnt sit too well with most others though they do like to leech off its corpse.
The point is that this jewish owned rag constantly denigrates the historic American people, while constantly praising anyone who is not part of the core Anglo population.
It reflects the very ancient jewish jealousy and hatred of Europeans and European-derived peoples because our superior civilization and culture makes them feel insecure.
Please answer my question:
How positive must a 'minority' person be before the NYT is allowed to say anything good about him/her, according to you? Or are you really saying that the NYT should NEVER say anything good about a 'minority' person?
OK.....
I am in el lay and have been to Santa Ana..as early as the 1980s there were reports of machine gun fire near city hall...
lotsa mexican / alien gangs
I avoid the NYTimes...
they published a piece by Vicente Fox maybe 2 years ago in the magazine section..
it was called BORDER RAP
WHO BETTER TO DISINFORM US THAN HE...
The same magazine section had a piece on sissy bounce..
black drags in new orleans shakin their behinds...
see..youtube / sissy bounce
check the article by Vicente Fox..
its worth maybe writing about
so there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post a Comment