 |
| 26OctMMXI - Clk 2 Enlrg |
Knowing that the Times would never publish a photo of a black person - much less a black female - accused of a crime as inconclusive as this one, and on their front page no less, I had to do a double take after initially thinking that the woman pictured had something to do with the gun smuggling case.
It turns out that my reaction is exactly what the reality contortionists at the Times had expertly planned for: the photo in question was in fact taken in a haunted house. So no, it's not a front-page crime story involving black females. The New York Times would never do that to a member of their favorite protected class.
But they did want their readers to assume, in a split-second judgement call, that the lady below and her nostrils, were somehow part of the gun smuggling case. Then the Times wanted you to feel guilty for even thinking such a thing. Then they wanted you to realize how enlightened and unbigoted they are by publishing Miss Neverending Nostril's pic in the first place, right below a story about New York cops doing all kinds of illegal nonsense.
And of course, besides these obvious points, the subliminal intrigue goes deeper still: what likelihood is there that the NYT would have published this photo, right there on the front page, if the scary white girl had been a 300-pound black dude, and the screaming, hysterical couple had been a pair of skinny whites?
 |
The New York Times IS: 24/7 Diversity Enforcement No Matter What |
5 comments:
Not by chance is the creature menacing the innocent black couple White!
The New Yuck Times gets it wrong every time. Those on the left of the picture are scary enough without them even trying.
Did they paper the walls in that room with job applications to scare those nogs?
"Neverending nostrils" lol !
Gawd, the animal quality of those negro eyeballs. It's like looking into the eyes of a wildebeast that can talk (barely).
the gal is so unflattering..how could they publish a picture that unflattering of a black gal
Post a Comment