Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Thursday, October 13, 2011

It's Official : The New York Times Has Gone Officially Bonkers

13 OctMMXI-Clk to Enlarge
"In Strangers Glances at Family, Tensions Linger"

Today, on the Front Page no less of Amerika's newspaper of record, we have more anti-majority racialist population substitution propaganda from Times communist Susan Saulny (whom we have blogged about previously).

The Times thinks that their morally superior position confers upon them the right - indeed the vocation - to treat highly controversial subjects as if they own them. And have the final word on them, lording over YOU, the unenlightened, pre-NWO masses who don't know squat about How It Should Be.

This shit is so sickening, so over-the top crazy, so mind-twistingly perverted and just psychotic, that it has ruined my whole day. I don't even know where to begin.

The NYT is obviously aiming for the chest with a high-caliber emotional charge when they publish stuff like this, on their FRONT PAGE no less. As I have noted in letters to and posts about Nick Kristof (who also does another amazing erectus-uplift puff piece in today's Op-Ed section entitled "One Girl's Courage" - but that is commentary for another day) what is truly sick about the Times' take on societal maters is that their articles imply ever so clearly that the majority - the historical and current majority of the West - are a sick, diseased bunch in their eyes. The Times hates you, if you are a member of the majority. You need to Be Gone, if you are part of that hated, historically ruthless band of racist over-achievers.

Saulny's front-page hate-fest of a piece today makes no bones about how incredibly sick, hateful and depraved people like you really are.

From the article :

This stuff is hard-core. I've been thinking about what to blog about this crap all day. It's depressing realizing that the nation's newspaper of record gleans moral superiority from this type of reporting.

But what's really depressing, are the 500-some-odd NYT-approved reader comments (they refused to publish mine, go figure).

Here are a few scary examples, with first off the main photo published on top of Saulny's "In Strangers' Glances" article. Note the evil white guy on the top right checking out the mixed-race couple with his hateful, racist stare.

Some stomach-churning examples of readers comments : 





Sorry to gross you guys out guys. But this is what is going on. This is official public policy. This is it. 


Anonymous said...

The liberal jew race mixing NYT agenda is beyond the pale. This comes from the people that are the most segregated race in the world, the jew. They hate whites and all other races. They want the other races to mix as they assume that is the best way for the jew to control the world. So far they are doing a bang up job of it, but there day will come too and it won't be what they expect.

Anonymous said...

The slur "Racist" is an invention by the mass murder Leon Trotsky. Trotsky used his newely invented Marxist slur to vilify a group of Slavs who valued their culture and way of life as backward & others like them as simply racist. This ethnocentric backwardness must take a back seat to true enlightenment i.e international communism.

Trotsky slur would go on to send the government, the education system through (fabricated revisionist history) and the mass media on an absolute royal cursade until they themselves and virtually everyone else around them actually believed it. It also empowered literally the most rotten, traitorous weasels within the west to redefine those loyal to their people as the worst evil & portraying the white man as the perpetrator of slavery and genocide in the world.

It is now a hate crime for white people to love their own people and culture. Their impressionable children & students are brainwashed into hating their nations and culture. They are being deliberately demoralized into accepting their internationalist agenda.

The word "Racist" is just malicious slur. Treat it as such.

Anonymous said...

anon 1:34 : so true.

So, bloody true.

At least the one thing we can rejoice in is that white people are waking up.

White people created the modern world. There is not a SINGLE invention on this planet of any import that does not have white DNA all over it.

Anonymous said...

I read the "Times" as well, and often feel nausea when reading through article comments, particularly for articles that have anything to do with race.
The fact that the vast majority of such comments tend to reinforce the doctrinaire views on race expounded by the "Times" and other instruments of elitist dogma might indicate the extent of the brainwashing of America's educated classes. But on the other hand, dissenting comments are often simply not published. I submitted several comments on this article, none of which were abusive, but none of which appeared in the comments section.
Anti-racism and the uplifting of black people are central tenets in what has become essentially a religious doctrine, in which public expressions of religious faith are expected, and public dissension will lead to punishment and expulsion from the community. Of course, the fact that this religious doctrine will lead to the extinction of white Europeans and their replacement with Africans makes it very important.

Keep up the analysis and exposure of these pathological fanatics.

Anonymous said...

I have children and grandchildren, and I can assure you that the brain washing that has gone on for generations now in school has worked its evil and IS working its evil even at this moment. I am afraid there is no turning back. THEY have won.

Anonymous said...

One of the more nauseating Times articles I've seen in a while.

Anonymous said...

Note the evil white guy on the top right checking out the mixed-race couple with his hateful, racist stare.

Its clever isnt it. Thats what the viewer of the photo is supposed to think, at a sub-conscious level.

For all we know he was just thinking "Whats that photographer taking pics of?" or scoping out some woman in a bikini with beautiful 42DD breasts (Unfortunately behind the photographer)

The point is that is image was chosen to convey a message, that message is the important thing, what really happened at that moment isnt important. Its who gets to frame the narrative, thats what counts.