Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Friday, October 21, 2011

The New York Times Promotes Interracial Buggery As A Wholesome And Enlightened Life-Choice

"Dressing Two Grooms for a Same-Sex Wedding"

Original Caption Reads: "The New York Times Encourages
 Sodomy, Especially When It's Interracial"*

Nothing gives the morality athletes at the New York Times more of a tingle in the ole' rectum than the thought of an average American white boy being anally ravaged by an imported diversity. For them, this is the very height of civilizational enlightenment and moral rectitude (ahem).

In a sane society, in a great civilization, the official newspaper of record actively promotes interracial sodomy as a healthy and wholesome behaviour, the mating strategy of choice among that society's best and brightest young citizens.

(Sound of tires screeching)!....


Juniper in the Desert said...

This way, only the muzrats reproduce and create the next generation!! Social engineering. Here in UK we have lesbians in charge of family units in the social services: why not have some foxes in charge of the hen-house?? I love foxes far more than I do the buggers!!

Anonymous said...

The NYT approves of all phenomena that will lead to a long-term decrease in the population of people of European descent. It also champions all phenomena that increase the world's population of people of African descent. These simple rules of thumb can explain much of the content of this "newspaper of record", although other ethno-political considerations, having to do with the ethnicity of the owners and publishers of the paper, also play an important role.

For the most part, the Times' advocacy has been restricted to indirect means of achieving the extermination of Europeans: Championing sexual degeneracy and "gay rights", advocating the re-allocation of wealth to dark-skinned people, demonizing Western culture and religious traditions. Might a time come when the Times begins to advocate more active, concrete means to achieve the extermination of Europeans? Now, of course, that would be inconceivable. But in 10 or 20 years' time, perhaps not. How will the extermination of Europeans shape up in coming decades? Or will some unexpected development reverse this trend and foil the schemes of the maniac social engineers at the Times?