|15DecMMXI - Clk 2 Enlrg|
So, on the one hand the Times uses the Marines to show what a swell guy our half-Kenyan Kommander in Chief is, right before literally digging through steaming heaps of garbage in an Iraqi dump to dig up dirt on the same Marines they use to make Obama look legit.
Seriously, that's what the NYT did: dig through Iraqi garbage in search of damning evidence of the US Army's armed reaction to a hostile, martrydom-loving, RPG-to-the-teeth armed Islamic scourge before being handcuffed by suicidal rules of engagement later in the war. And since he who seeks, finds, creepy, treasonous Times journos unearthed piles of secret documents containing sensitive info related to American so-called atrocities in Iraq, that Stone-Age shit heap wrenched by Western innovation in general, and American intervention in particular, from backwardness and a bleak and largely worthless existence. And of course the Times promptly released the juiciest bits of damning, anti-military evidence to their eager corps of America-hating, diversity-enforcing New York Times readership. Seriously, you should read the sanctimonious, morality-competing, self-value-enhancing ("I'm better than you because I hate the Marines and love the common Iraqi more than you, dude") and highly predictable thoughts expressed by Times readers in the comments section of this article.
|Obama Turns His Back On White Marines He Will Later Spit On At Fort Bragg,|
While First Tranny Michelle Robonson-Obama Looks On, Sort Of
As the New York Times congratulates themselves for exposing state secrets, à la Wikileaks, without apparently even being aware of how hypocritical they appear by using the very Marines they attack to legitimize the Usurper in Chief, we at COTT can only SMH.
From the article :
The New York Times: Getting Worse Since 2009.