Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Friday, May 3, 2013

(As Much As We Hate To Return There): The Scientists Have Spoken; The Architects And Engineers Have Spoken; The Political History Of Outside Influence Experts Have Spoken... Now, When Added To That Mix Are Aviation And Military Experts SUPPORTED In Their Assertions By "HBD Experts," Well...

A question you may not have heard: were 19 Arab Bedouinic Muslim  terrorists armed with box cutters and in possession of not one second of actual airborne flight training, really capable of piloting those slow-flying, difficult-to-maneuver jumbo jets with such deadly precision?

Consider that even the cleverest Islamic suicide bomber usually never manages to take out more than a few victims at a time, at best. (They were bested by Breivik in a pretty big way which they are no doubt jealous of).

Tatu Van Hanen and Richard Lynn in "IQ and the Wealth of Nations" calculate the average IQ of Saudi Arabians to be in about the upper 80s range, while other sources* show that a commercial jetliner requires a pilot to have an IQ almost two full standard deviations above that.

[Kwik tangentialization time: in another total HBD-realism Fail, the NYT published on the Front Page today an article on Egypt's frightening population explosion entitled, "As Egypt Birthrates Rise, Population Policy Vanishes", in which not a single word was uttered about : 1) the super-high rates of kin marriage in that country and in the Islamic world generally ; 2) the inarguably terrible physical and mental drawbacks that results from such cousin-marriage. In a sane society the press would be talking about kin marriage and IQ inhibitors all the time, but...]. /off/tangent/off//

In light of this HBD-aware theory (which summarized bluntly: the 911 hijackers did not possess the mind power to successfully pull off such a Massive Attack), consider the implausibility of the Official Narrative from the military / aviation point of view :
Before reviewing the military air defense response on 9/11, it is important to remember objectively what the 'official story' asks the public to believe. According to their narrative, on the morning of September 11, four enormous, fuel-laden, lumbering jumbo jets were hijacked by 19 Arab men with box-cutters and zero in-air flight experience. These slow, unmaneuverable planes were then flown for 1 hour and 45 minutes through the most restricted airspace in the world without eliciting a single military intercept. The most sophisticated military in the world, able to strike dime-sized targets from hundreds of miles away with laser-guided missiles, precision radar equipment, and state of the art aircraft capable of flying well over 1,300 mph, could not locate, engage, nor intercept four wandering jumbo jets. A military that has a budget larger than the combined military assets of every other country in the world could not scramble, intercept and engage any of the radically wayward planes. Even Flight 77, which was allowed to fly unimpeded and crash into the Pentagon one full hour after two jets had been flown into the Twin Towers in NYC, failed to elicit the response and intercept from any military jets. Nor, indeed, did flight 93. A plane that crashed in a Pennsylvania field 1 hour and 45 minutes after the first plane was confirmed hijacked.
Read more from this guy here.


I hate, Hate HATE conspiracy theories. But it is becoming increasingly clear that all the false-flag or whatever weirdness behind 911 is the same sort of subterfuge that resulted in Michelle Obama becoming First Lady.


Anonymous said...

In any event every single military and civilian official responsible for the defense of this country should have not only been summarily relieved of their duties and tried in a court of law for dereliction of duty, incompetence, and failure to carry out their sworn duties there should have been death sentences carried out. Instead, not a single one of the many hundreds of people involved were so much as reprimanded much less fired or tried in a court nor were any of the military commanders court martial-ed.
Why was President Bush not immediately sequestrated by the secret service when it became known that planes were hijacked and being flown into targets? His itinerary for his trip to Florida was known two days in advance. Was it also known that the school he was at listening to "My Pet Goat" was not a target of the hijacked planes?
Why haven't officials who are known to have destroyed tapes and other evidence not been fired and tried in a court of law?
There are millions of questions and the answers are waiting.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.