Michelle LaVaughn "They Said I Wasn't Smart Enough" Robinson Obama Exposed: In What Is Probably The Most Unflattering Photo Of The First Lady Ever Published, Thoughts Of Paul Du Chaillu Spring To Mind...

Photo has not been enhanced. 

Swiss TV : "Cherche Blanc à Marier" (Translation: "African Seeks White Person For Marriage")

The modern world is truly a repulsive, fetid place.

For full 56-minute video, go here.

Sorry it is not translated from the French. You'll figure it by watching anyway, in case you're not versed in that language.

Word Verification : It's A Pain In The Ash I Know, But I Am Happy To Report That The Nigerian-Style Spammers Have Buzzed Off As A Result....

...like so many horrible and sickly flies buzzing the beautiful eyes and majestic ears of a thoroughbred under siege.

The Hateful Vermin At Amerika's Newspaper of Record Sneer At Harmless White College Kids "Invading" The Pristine Beaches of The Hamptons

Sun 26 May MMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

On the front page of today's Sunday New York Times, there is a slightly below-the fold feature article entitled: "As Boozy Invaders Hit Beach, Hamptons Sound a Snooki Alert."

Predictably and wholly hysterically and  hypocritically, this front-page doozie attempts to cast white NYC-based students and young professionals into some kind of East Coast Spring Break mayhem in the Hamptons scenario. 

Common sense and a modicum of reality would suggest otherwise. 

Try to imagine for two seconds the sniveling diversity kommissar psychopaths at the New York Times giving similar "they're a rowdy crowd" treatment - on their front page no less! - to the African Americans who converge every year in Miami for "Urban Beach Week," with the entirely predictable homicidal results. The inestimable Jim Goad wrote about UBW here.  

The NYT Hates - And I Mean Hates - This Crowd For One Reason And One Reason Only 

Answer : it would not happen, Nay, because in the lying eyes of the Times, American minorities - of course first and foremost blacks - can do no wrong, whatsoever. What. So. Ever. 

Only whites - and especially white males, and even uber-especially white males benefiting from any kind of hereditary "privilege" - can be blamed for anything, anything whatsoever bad that happens in this increasingly diseased dystopia that are the U.S.A.. 

And so, right there on the front page, planted square between the eyes in the middle of the most expensive publishing real estate on planet earth, the wormy little eunuchs of 42nd Street give us : "As Boozy Invaders Hit Beach, Hamptons Sound a Snooki Alert."

A "Snooki" alert? 

What is hilarious about this front page puff piece, is that it exposes the reality of the Times' own hypocritical desperation to smear the people it hates most - namely, non-NAMs - by enlisting  as unlikely allies the rich white WASPS of the Hamptons. 

From the article : 

AMAGANSETT, N.Y. — For generations, few beaches in the Hamptons were more coveted and jealously protected than Indian Wells. 

Last year, a rowdy crowd began showing up at Indian Wells Beach in East Hampton, adding to the crowds and transportation log jam.

A new wave of revelers arrived on Friday. Its high dunes and wide stretches of clean white sand have inspired painters and writers, and have fed real estate values of up to $20 million for the mansions that face it. And only cars with the blue-and-white permits of town homeowners can be parked in its lot, giving the beach an exclusive, local flavor. 

Then, last summer, they started arriving by bus and by van, including one with an ominous black pirate flag: hundreds of young partyers from parts unknown, hauling kegs and cases of beer with them, guzzling it down fraternity style and, in a couple of cases immortalized in police summonses, relieving themselves in the dunes. The local newspaper, The East Hampton Star, called it The Invasion of the Beery Beach Blanketeers.        

Before their rather big falling-out after Barbarossa, the Soviets allied themselves with the Nazis for the invasion of Poland; could it be that, like the communists in the USSR, the communists at the New York Times are willing to ally themselves with the uber-wealthy wasps they hate so much, in order to wage common warfare against those who in the withered eyes of the Times are an even greater enemy: namely: white Spring-Breaker types and the unacceptable comfort backgrounds they represent?

There's no real way to know for certain.

The New York Times: Like A Crazed Chick Who Insists On Getting Chinese Pictograms Tattooed On The Back Of Her Neck, There's No Real Way To Know For Certain What They're Thinking

Flash From The Past: JFK Debates Nixon In September 1960, In the The Very First Live TV Presidential Debate

Well, This Is Embarrassing: Google Somehow Gobbles Up A Very Long Post From Earlier Tonight Entitled: "Unbelievable Snivel Rights Status-Whoring By The Afrophiliac Reality-Reversers At The New York Times"

Fri24MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

We spent a while putting this post together, too.

Ouch.

In addition to the article cited below, in this scrubbed post we also discussed:

- James Bevel (close MLK associate, died 2008 in prison, raped his own daughters)
- Tyrone Brooks (MLK "street soldier", convicted of gibs me dat fraud in Georgia, object of the Kim Severson article cited below)
- Kim Severson (man-jawed gender-neutral NYT journalist who wrote the piece in question)
- Nathaniel Mills (white Olympic speed skater married to Bevel's besmudged daughter, Jamese' [seriously], who later changed her name to "Aaralyn Bevel", then to "Aaralyn Mills", as in: "Mrs. Aaralyn (Aryan?) Nathaniel Mills")
- Phoebe Mills (gymnast sister of Nate, won bronze for U.S. in Seoul, 1988)
- Emmit Till (future rapist killed in 1955 before he was able to actually rape anyone; father hung by Army in 1945 for raping and murdering Italian women)
- Rudyard Kipling (his name keeps popping up a lot these days)

Anyway, this is the first time in nearly four years of using blogger that a post in progress has completely disappeared. Usually Blogger is really good about automatically saving works in progress; this might have had something to to with opening the site simultaneously in multiple browsers.

Oh well. We will finish the post on Kim Severson's article tomorrow.

In the meantime, you can almost figure out what the whole thing is about by this, simply:

"Civil Rights Firebrand's Fraud Case In Georgia Now Has Others Treading Softly"by Kim Severson (seen here:)


From the article :

Again, there's a lot to say about this piece. We said it before, but sorry, Google gobbled it all up. 

We'll re-do it again tomorrow. 

James Bevel : 

Washington Post article on MLK right-hand man and convicted muh dik incest rape ape James Bevel: "A Father's Shadow". (Winky winky: kinda like Severson's NYT puff piece, this WaPo article begins with the words: "He [Bevel] was a civil rights hero." {chortle} ). 

James Bevel's daughter Aaralyn Mills : 

The New York Times: God Dangit Google Gobbled My Punch Line ! 

Disgusting Dirty-Beard Britishized Muslim "Scholar" Speaking In The Accent Of The Land His Filthy Kin Have Invaded Refuses To Condemn The London Beheaders

Paul Du Chaillu: The First European To Exhibit African Gorillas

This is a re-post, because this du Chaillu dude is one of my favorite historical figures right now, along with Frenchman Claude Chappe, who developed the world's very first long-distance communications system (which in 1794 allowed Parisians to know the results of a major battle that occurred over 200 miles away, in less than an hour), and S.A. Andrée of Sweden, one of the world's first and greatest balloonist / explorers.  

Note: word verification is back on for this site. Sorry about that. But at least the satanic locust-like nigerian-style spammer comments have ceased to infest. Bug spray for all of them I say !

[re-blogged from Sunday 7 April, 2013] 

Sun7AprMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

From today Sunday's New York Times Book Review: 

"Planet of the Ape: Between Man And Beast, by Monte Reel"

And on the cover no less ! 

We talked about this De Chaillu dude not too long ago, because his role in familiarizing Europeans with the higher primates that whites did not even know existed until the mid-1800s, contributes a lot to understanding the mindset of Euros in the midst of the Darwinian Revolution. 

From the perspective of this blog and other Southern nationalist sites such as Hunter Wallace's OD, de Chaillu's contribution to Western justification for slavery - even if it came relatively late in the game (de Chaillu lived from 1831 to 1903) - cannot be overstated. 

Naturally the New York Times makes the very first chronicler of african mountain gorillas out to  be nothing more than a circus performer and a bumbling opportunist, in their review of this book on De Chaillu written by Monte Reel of the Washington Post. 

The fact is that Euros were as confused back then as they are today when it comes to grasping the reality of their own hierarchical exceptionalism. 

To truly understand De Chaillu's gorilla exhibits in the context of slavery in the New World, one must read not "Of Inhuman Bondage" by America's pre-eminent "specialist" on slavery, David Brion Davis, but rather Hunter Wallace of Occidental Dissent and his review of the DBD mega-tome. 

From the Times' Book Review: 

Du Chaillu was a young explorer of part-French extraction, son of a trader, poorly educated but a good marksman, who emerged from Gabon in 1859, after a four-year hunting expedition, with 20 preserved skins of a kind of massive ape, known to the local people as njena. The animal soon took its familiar name, gorilla, by loose borrowing from the ancient Greek account of a voyage by Hanno the Navigator, who claimed to have seen some big and hairy people along the African coast and called them Gorillae, though almost certainly they weren’t actual gorillas. Science now recognizes two species, the eastern gorilla (of which the famously endangered mountain gorillas are a subspecies) and the western, which includes those individuals that fell to Du Chaillu’s gun. But such modern taxonomic dicing is far removed, in time and spirit, from the tale of scientific buccaneering and creationist discomfiture that Reel, a former correspondent for The Washington Post, tells in this intriguing book.

Du Chaillu explaining African primates to a bewildered London audience at the London Anthropological Society, circa 1870

London Beheading: Facebook Footage Shows Exterminating The Vermin

What white Britons are slowly awakening to is the horrific reality that these utterly unassimilable Nigerian jihadist orcs are unlimited in number, and becoming fully un-extinguishable as a locust-like satanic force on a planetary scale, as a tiny minority among the policy-makers of the West continues to push to feed their kind with Western food aid, so that back home Nigerian women can boast the world's second highest fertility rate, with yes about seven children per female uterus.

What you have to understand about the London beheaders: these creatures are not like their victim; they are tens of thousands of years if not more behind their victim and his kin on a purely evolutionary level. They do not value life the same way Westerners do. The difference that liberals love to hate, is what makes these people so utterly dangerous. And they are absolutely unlimited in a purely numerological sense. Africa tipped the one billion mark on the Afrometer in 2010;  you can be sure that 95% of every single new additional African child was the direct result of white Western food aid. Virtually every percentile of the rest of the increase in population was the indirect result of Western technology: medicine and infrastructure, etc.

Thanks Bill and Melinda ! Great work we say !!

Keep in mind: unlike the United States, Britain was 100% white until 1948, when the very first boatload of diversity from Jamaica showed up.

The name of the ship was the MV "Empire Windrush", aptly named I am not sure. It carried almost 500 enrichers from Jamaica which though bad, is not nearly as bad as Nigeria.

From Daily Mirror: the vid of the two surplus Nigerian hominids, wholly produced, clothed, grain-fed and raised on British Imperial guilt, being made not-quite-good by an all-Brit metro police car-full of coppers :

 
Video here.

Word Verification Is Back On In The Comments Section Here - Sorry !

But this site has come under a Enoch Powell-style onslaught of stupid, nigerian-like crap scum spam commenters.

For the past three weeks or so, these comments - which number in the thousands, the majority are blocked by my spam filter thank goodness -   have been of such utter inanity and worthlessness, you have to wonder if the creatures that typed them in are not part of some other-worldly satanic locust-like plague whose only purpose on earth is to "afflict the comfortable."

Wait, "comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable" ? Hmm... sounds familiar.

So, sorry COTTers. You will have to go through that awful word verification thing to prove you're not a nigerian locust.

Please comment abundantly anyway.

London Beheading: Rudyard Kipling Chimes In

THE WRATH OF THE AWAKENED SAXONby Rudyard Kipling

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy -- willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate.

Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not suddently bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.

London Beheading: An Inconvenient Truth Predictably Ignored By The Vermin At The New York Times

Wed.22MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlr

Times online search for : "London beheading" :



Okay, it does sorta pop up in the seventh position.

So maybe the vermin at the Times really are honest, after all?

Answer: nah

The New York Times Makes A Flaccid, Pitiful Attempt To Spit On American G.I.s During WW2

In France they have an expression: "Le beurre et l'argent du beurre." Or "the butter and the money of the butter," IOW: "to have one's cake and eat it too."

It is an expression that aptly applies to the filthy, lying vermin at the disgusting New York Times, who had the audacity to publish a book review in today's The Arts section entitled "The Dark Side of Liberation," by Times communist and reality reverser Jennifer Schuessler (email her!).  

Schuessler's review is of a book written by an ethnomasochistic white woman named Mary Louise Roberts, entitled "What Soldiers Do," that according to the lying psychopaths at the Times, documents "abuse by G.I.'s in France during World War II."

Of course, everyone knows that most mass rapes during and after WW2 were committed by the Soviets - especially after the fall of Germany - and by mostly negro American G.I.'s, and by Allied auxiliary soldiers from North Africa. Sofia Loren even won an Oscar for her rôle in depicting an Italian rape victim at Monte Cassino at the hands of these beasts, "Two Women" or "Ciociaria":

But the history-revising reality-reversers at Amerika's newspaper of record have no time for such trivial historical fact. You see, "historians of gender" as the Times hilariously refers to them, instead of reading the same old boring books about what really happened, find the work of a man-jawed feminist with a hard-on for smearing American servicemen without really specifying which ones are actually to blame (hint: Emmitt Till's father was hanged by the army for raping Italian women), well, they think such a novel new work is a "breath of fresh air."

From the review:

The only problem here is that by writing about WW2 rape the New York Times is forced to provide a modicum of truth, what with the pesky internet out there making it so easy to confirm their perfidy these days. And so any discussion about rape by U.S. servicemen during WW2, is invariably going to have to address what the Times calls the "overrepresentation of blacks," but not as the actual perpetrators of said rapes, but rather as those prosecuted for the perpetration of such rapes.

Unbelievably, almost, from the review :

 But this last bit represents, even for the New York Times, new heights in Official Make Believe and high-minded Blame Shifting :

A richer and more realistic picture. Applies only to the criminally insane.

MLK's Legacy Milked Large: Obama Delivers Morehouse Graduation Ceremony Speech On The 50th Anniversary Of Alum MLK's "I Have A Dream" Speech

Is The New York Times taking their minority uplift Crusade a little too far?

Could it be that the ordinary Americans who are despised by the elitist diversity kommissars at Amerika's newspaper of record are finally catching on to the Times' Dark and Sinister agenda,  made plain by the ATF photo depicted in miniature at right?

It was in fact published prominently today right there on the front page - the world's most expensive publishing real estate - along with a  caption that led the reader to the full article on page 16 entitled: "Obama Urges Morehouse Graduates To 'Keep Setting An Example'" 

From the article :

“We know that too many young men in our community continue to make bad choices,” Mr. Obama said. “And I have to say, growing up I made quite a few myself. Sometimes I wrote off my own failings as just another example of the world trying to keep a black man down.” 

“But one of the things all of you have learned over the last four years is there’s no longer any room for excuses,” the president said to the roughly 500 graduates in a downpour, his words punctuated by claps of thunder."

Consider the symbolism of this photo, which accompanied "Obama Urges Morehouse" :



COTT analysis :

Historically oppressed black male student from Morehouse College - MLK's very own alma mater -   listening stoically to the nation's first black president on the 50th anniversary no less of King's "I have a dream" speech, as evil racist rain drops soak his (taxpayer-paid) mortarboard, which he proudly cocks rearward in a courageous display of defiance against those forces who want to keep him and his people down - those same forces the half-Kenyan president alludes to in his speech.

Somehow I am thinking that the sick, diseased, hateful minds at the Times printed this "noble Morehouse graduate endures racist rainfall" photo as some kind of twisted-logic, other-worldly  correction to an article they published three days earlier entitled "A President Tries To Regain His Footing", which featured a photo of the now-famous incident where a Marine was ordered by BO to shield Himself and the Turkish PM from the rain with umbrellas:

Even though practically every other news source on the internet was talking about this breach of protocol, and how potentially bad it made BO look, the Times did not even mention it in "A President Tries to Regain."  They have either become aware of their gaffe, or are now so brazen in their contempt for non-protected groups that they are rubbing it in their readers' faces with sick, sadistic glee.

The New York Times: A Modern Day Spanish Inquisition* Since 1965

(*the S.I. as the NYT would depict it, that is. As in: wrongly).

White Kid In Germany Bullied By Turkish Enricher

In The Same Way That I Am Disheartened, Baffled, Amazed, A Little Disgusted And Plain Shocked When Transiting Through Ronald Reagan Airport In D.C., Where Virtually Every Single Concourse Worker Is Some Foreign-Born Non-Euro, I Am Getting A Sick Feeling By The Recent Turn Of Events In The Comments Section Of This Blog

Fri17MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

I have been deleting the nigerian-style spamware to spare you.

It is getting worse and worse. It is a sickening onslaught of unwanted visitors seeking something we have that they don't.

Sound familiar?

It is like there is no escape from the nightmare dystopia that the vermin at the New York Times have worked so long and so hard to force upon us.

It seems, there truly is no end to this curse.

Pray I be wrong, let it not be so. For it is otherwise the worst kind of the triumph of evil.

Does Anyone Know Who Are The Scum That Keep Inundating This Blog's Comments Section With Inane Nigerian-Style Spam ?

Thur 16 May MMXIII - Clk2Enlg

It is irritating as all get-go; it feels like no wall, no barrier or border is impervious to turd world crowd-out infiltration from cargo-cult missing links, empowered as they are with shiny Chinese-made garbage electronics manufactured (shoddily) by crap (sorry), unworthy civilizations whose every skewed facet of modernity is a poorly replicated version of the Western original.

Could Camp Of The Saints-style inundation of the West apply also to the blogosphere?

Or are these comment-box vermin paid trolls?

Alt-rightosphere bloggers: please chime in.

Here's two examples of many awful, filthy, scam-style comments that have been popping up in the comments section here at COTT for the past two weeks or so (note the input times: this reeks of organized trolling, not commercial endeavour) :

A History Of Islam Totally Not Approved By The New York Times

In A NYT Sunday Book Review Of Two New WW1 History Tomes, The Psychotic One-World Equalizers At Amerika's Newspaper Of Record Coin An Especially Hilarious New Phrase Of All-Inclusiveness

"On The Brink: 'The Sleepwalkers' and 'July 1914' "

From the review :

You read that right: "historians of gender."

The New York Times: Building Pyramids Of Equalist Stupidity Since 1896 (When The Sulzies Gained Control)

Mothers' Day Parade In New Orleans Attacked by ICBMs

12MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

"17 Wounded in New Orleans Shooting"

"Parade Ambush: New Orleans"

"ICBM" -  Inner City Black Male

(Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles stopped being Western Civilization's main concern in 1965).

The New York Times: Though They Have Practically Nothing To Do  WIth This Story, You Know That If They Could, They Would.

Bonus trivia photo: super-cool screwdriver from space :

We Could Have Been To Mars

Colonel Hadfield calls it "politics." Could it be he secretly understands the HBD origins of this photo :

Bangladesh Building Collapse: You're Probably Wearing Socks That Were Stitched Together By These Poor People, Whom We Mourn...

Sat11MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

But whether you're wearing Bangladeshi-produced socks or underwear, that's not really the point: the point is to understand why and how the NYT shapes public opinion not just in the USA, but in the entirety of the First World.

"17 Days In Darkness, A Cry Of 'Save Me,' And Joy"

Question : Why were so many Bangladeshis killed in the Rana Plaza building collapse?

Answer : Westerners (read: whites) needed cheap socks and shirts at WalMart.

Question : Why were so many of the victims of the building collapse unclaimed by relatives, and buried anonymously in mass graves?

Answer : Westerners (read: whites). White people not only created the conditions for Asians, formerly colonized by whites, to be able to dramatically increase life expectancy and have more children (hard support in the form of U.N.-mandated white Western food aid; soft support in the form of trickle-down technology transfers; soft support as well in the form of trickle-down cultural transfers (namely: the thousands of Bangladeshis educated in the West who return home with Western skills and Western notions of public policy);  but also, Westerners via manipulation through their elites created the outsourcing phenomena and the demand for cheap consumer goods that enabled the creation of hundreds of millions of dollar-twenty a day garment industry jobs ;

Question: If the people who write the editorials at the New York Times are so sanctimonious and holy, how could they countenance such a thing as dark-skinned Bangladeshis working slave hours for 41$ per month, as the NYT reports?

Answer: The NYT is a pernicious and evil institution, whose goal is to equalize humanity on a planetary scale on an incremental basis. It would be counter-productive for them to declare day after day on their front page: "Hey, it's just not right that these noble people who work  in the garment industry for 41 bucks a month, in order that evil white people might be able to clothe themselves for cheap at WalMart, continue to be exploited like this, it must stop Right NOW! No more seven dollar short-sleeve shirts at WalMart again. EVER! Free The Workers!!" Taking such a radical position would risk exposing the inherent HBD theoretical underpinnings of the globalization that the NYT works so rabidly to support.

IOW: In a sane society, the horrific death by crushing of over one thousand wage slaves in far-off lands would lead to serious, daily debate about the central causes of global inequality and the wealth and development inequality that results. But such a discussion would have to include bullet points on the now officially-discredited "Richwine model" of non-white Hispanic dysfunction, which as we have seen has until now been a very no-no, nyet-nyet subject indeed.

Just ax Rachel Maddow :
(Warning: watching may cause sickness)

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Oh and by the way: as always, for the spottest-most spot-on interpretation of the Jason Richwine scandal and the gloomy truth it illuminates in the shadows of the Dark Cathedral's darkest chapels, you must check out the ever-masterful Château his baddest-ass self :

"What Will The World Look Like When (Not If) Equalists Accept HBD"

The New York Times: As The Pretty Lies Unravel,  We Wait In The Corridor, Duct Tape And Rope  In Hand, For The Trial To Conclude

The Embarrassing, Revealing Tale Of The "Troubled", Half-Algerian Grandson Of Malcolm X : Oh, How The New York Times Wished It Weren't So

"Troubled Life In Malcolm X's Shadow Comes to A Violent End"

It seems that from Day One, this kid was playing the race card, and the verminous reality contortionists at the New York Times, as is their wont, were helping him every step of the way.

Malcolm X's Half-Algerian Illegitimate
Grandson Malcolm Shabazz, Photographed
By White DWL Fotog "X"

Twenty-eight years old when he was murdered by Mexicans in that capitol city four days ago, Malcolm "Shabazz" was the only child of single-mother Quibalah Shabazz (I know), who herself was one of six daughters born to Stick-Age communist racist Malcolm X.

Quibalah gave birth to son Malcolm Shabazz in Paris, which sounds exotic, but in fact it is way more pathetic and indicative of black dysfunction on a global scale than it is Jim Morrison chic: turns out Malcolm Jr. was the spawn of an Algerian man who was just, um, passing through, That's why Malcolm X's dead grandson has such strong afro-semitic features.

The New York Times of course was forced to write about Malcolm Shabazz in 1997 when at twelve years old, he set a fire to the Bronx apartment of his grandmum Betty, Malcolm's widow, that resulted in her death by burn wounds three weeks later.

It is worthwhile to note that the only reason that the young Shabazz was staying when he was 12  with his grandmammy and not with his birth mother Quibalah, is that his mum had been nabbed by the FBI for her role in an assassination plot against Louis Farrakhan, HNIC of the Nation Of Islam, for which she pleaded guilty.

After being locked up in 97' as a pre-pubescent troublemaker for 3.5 years (his arson sentence was actually only 18 months in juvie, but he kept escaping and assaulting guards and others), the Great Snivel Rights Leader's grandson emerged from prison with an ankle bracelet, and in record time he was back in the clink (after a violent street robbery).

During one those incarcerations, in 2003, Malcolm X's grandson wrote a letter to NYT reporter  Michael Wilson, who had just published an article on the jailed Shabazz after travelling to Attica in upstate NY to visit him behind bars. A revealing portion of that letter reads as follows :

(source)

Keep in mind that this is a letter from a kid (19 when he wrote it) who had been convicted of murdering his grandmother by burning her to death. As you can see, not a lot of refgret,. not a lot of remorse, not a lot of contrition. Rather, it all seems to be : "Me victim, me victim, me victim."

Kind of like his grandpappy?

Look, I'm not trying to be a dick. To be sure the poor kid had a rough childhood (which is sorta like saying that a mosquito whose family members were frequently eaten by spiders, is not guilty of murder when that mosquito infects a human with Malaria) {bad analogy, hey I tried}, but the whitewashing of his criminal tendencies which seem to be practically genetic in nature, is a dangerous thing for a society to do.

.../...

But COTT doth digress.

We found this interesting portrait of the young ex- and future-criminal Malcolm Shabazz at NewsOne dot calm, an illustrious online publication at least in the Predictable Category:

"Malcolm Shabazz, Grandson Of Malcolm X, Is Dead At 28"

From a long interview with young Malcolm from that News One article, this one paragraph below in particular is hauntingly revealing of the African American experience in America, and seems to echo with almost supernatural poignancy the central theme of FDR's 1936 Slave Narratives WPA project, namely: "We was better off when we had a white master" :

All my life, I’ve had [moments where] I’ve lived in the lap of luxury in the Trump Towers and not wanted for a single thing. And the very next day I’m [living in] a slum in a gang-infested Philly neighborhood, eating fried dough three times a day. One minute, I’m in a situation with structure and discipline. The next minute I’m running the streets with no supervision at all. One of my aunts has a friend who is very devoted to his children. I was hanging out with them one day and all he talked about was [their] schedule and sports and taking his kids here and there. I wish I had that. I wish I had someone whose purpose in life was to take care of me. That’s how white people do it. They plan for [their] kids. We don’t. That’s cause we don’t plan our kids. I wasn’t planned.

Yes, COTTers, words from the mouth of the progeny of the great Malcolm X himself: "I wish I had someone to take care of me."

The New York Times: Behold What You Have Wrought

The Lying, Verminous One-Worlders At Amerika's Newspaper of Record Dive Head-First Into The Deep End Of The HBD Debate-Pool...

Thu9MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

...and hit the diving board on the way down.

"Paper on Immigrant I.Q. Dogs Critics Of Immigration Overhaul"


Or did they?


According to the lion of the blogosphere* (formerly known as half sigma), instead of provoking a realistic debate about the true achievement potential of the legions of football-shaped mestizos from Mexico and Guatemala cleaning hotel rooms in the United States today, the emergence of this common sense policy paper is going to force Republicans to disavow it lest they be branded "racisst."

[Check out the fascinating comments there].

From the article (note the names of the NYT authors) :

The New York Times: Perpetuating Ashley Montague's Big Lie On Parade Since - Well, - Since 1946. 

NYT's Mosi Secret Reports: "Cyber Thieves Looted ATM's of 45 Million $ In Just Hours"

What the hell kind of name is "Mosi Secret"?

From the article:

Ah, the rewards of diversity and globalization. 

But what the hell kind of name is Mosi Secret? 

He further reports : 

Does The New York Times Have A Sense Of Humor?

Everybody's Heard Of The Rolling Stones Free Concert At Altamont Speedway In California, Where The Hells Angels Stabbed A Spectator To Death, But...

..... how many knew that the victim was an 18 year-old African American male named Meredith Hunter, who came to the show dressed like a pimp with his white girlfriend, and in possession of a .22 revolver, which he brandished at Mick Jagger while the band was trying to perform "Under My Thumb" ?

And (the plot thickens), how many reading here knew that Alan Passaro (Aug. 1948 - March 1985), the white Hells Angel who was tried for Hunter's Dec. 6th, 1969 stabbing death, was acquitted by a San Francisco jury in 1971, after the jury saw footage of the incident?

Plus: Meredith Hunter's mother sued the Rolling Stones for millions, but she lost on the strength of the footage shot by "Gimme Shelter" filmmaker David Maysles, which clearly shows that her boy Hunter was on a murderous rampage.

The Rolling Stones eventually gave Meredith Hunter's mother ten thousand dollars.



The New York Times: Has Absolutely Nothing To Do With This Story RIght Now, But I'm Sure That If They Did They Would Muddle Up The Facts Just Fine

Ten Million Bic Ball Point Pens Produced Every Day

Notice anything strange strange about Bic's annual report? :

"Chekist" (1992), Full Movie

This Russian film from two decades ago depicts the murderous zealotry of Marx's communist ideal.

The film takes place in about 1920 in a Russian town unnamed. There the local Chekist at the head of the local branch of the Soviet state security organization created by Lenin to crush "counter-revolutionary" activities, oversees the systematic execution of hundreds or more of his fellow countrymen.

After the execution of Tsar Nicholas and his family, the revolutionary bolsheviks went after mostly aristocrats, mercantile-types, and clergymen. Many of the murdered in "The Cheklist" are well-dressed bourgeois types representative of this target group.

With utter and drama-free Russian bluntness, this film illustrates what happens when an entire civilization is pissed off about something. Not to sound extreme, but it's almost like there is something healthy in the early soviets' designs to change society.

.../...

In the West today, the rage that broils just below the surface of every Western people, has for a long time been falsely diverted towards pseudo-threats such as global warming, obesity, second-hand tobacco smoke, seatbelt enforcement and road safety, etc..

Whereas in reality, the biggest threat to the West today is painfully and obviously to all Those Who Can See,  strictly demographic in nature.

When in London over half the population is now foreign-born, and where the most popular name for newborns is Muhammed, and where close to 80% of all births are to non-white, non-British mothers, then clearly we have a serious problem. Especially when this pattern repeats itself in virtually every "Western" country on the planet ! 

But instead of concentrating on the real source of the Decline, Western elites direct the natural, surging rage of their people into such safe haven issues as child safety seats, minority uplift, animal rights, prosecution for possession of pornography, etc ect.

With the film "Chekist," somehow it is deeply reassuring - while at the same time being horrible beyond comprehension - to realize that not even a century ago,  Eastern Europeans went to insanely extreme lengths to ensure the supremacy of their ideals.

"The Chekist" (1992) 

With Sinister Irony, The New York Times Publishes A Front Page Profile Piece Whose Title Describes Their Very Own Tactics

Sun5MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

"The Dark Side, Carefully Masked"

This portrait of the Muslim bomber monster downplays the motivating role of Islam in the attacks, has zero problem with the Muslim monster bomber's Chechen parents' cheating the American asylum system, and generally is sympathetic to the person of the Muslim monster bomber from Boston, no I'm not going to bother attempting to spell his stupid Muslim name correctly.

A disgusting mud puppy from the Islamic turd world using stupid liberal ideals and policies endorsed by the fanatical diversity enforcers at the NYT to slash at the soft, pretty pale face of the West.

Vermin at the New York Times: you did this.

(As Much As We Hate To Return There): The Scientists Have Spoken; The Architects And Engineers Have Spoken; The Political History Of Outside Influence Experts Have Spoken... Now, When Added To That Mix Are Aviation And Military Experts SUPPORTED In Their Assertions By "HBD Experts," Well...

A question you may not have heard: were 19 Arab Bedouinic Muslim  terrorists armed with box cutters and in possession of not one second of actual airborne flight training, really capable of piloting those slow-flying, difficult-to-maneuver jumbo jets with such deadly precision?

Consider that even the cleverest Islamic suicide bomber usually never manages to take out more than a few victims at a time, at best. (They were bested by Breivik in a pretty big way which they are no doubt jealous of).

Tatu Van Hanen and Richard Lynn in "IQ and the Wealth of Nations" calculate the average IQ of Saudi Arabians to be in about the upper 80s range, while other sources* show that a commercial jetliner requires a pilot to have an IQ almost two full standard deviations above that.

[Kwik tangentialization time: in another total HBD-realism Fail, the NYT published on the Front Page today an article on Egypt's frightening population explosion entitled, "As Egypt Birthrates Rise, Population Policy Vanishes", in which not a single word was uttered about : 1) the super-high rates of kin marriage in that country and in the Islamic world generally ; 2) the inarguably terrible physical and mental drawbacks that results from such cousin-marriage. In a sane society the press would be talking about kin marriage and IQ inhibitors all the time, but...]. /off/tangent/off//

In light of this HBD-aware theory (which summarized bluntly: the 911 hijackers did not possess the mind power to successfully pull off such a Massive Attack), consider the implausibility of the Official Narrative from the military / aviation point of view :

Before reviewing the military air defense response on 9/11, it is important to remember objectively what the 'official story' asks the public to believe. According to their narrative, on the morning of September 11, four enormous, fuel-laden, lumbering jumbo jets were hijacked by 19 Arab men with box-cutters and zero in-air flight experience. These slow, unmaneuverable planes were then flown for 1 hour and 45 minutes through the most restricted airspace in the world without eliciting a single military intercept. The most sophisticated military in the world, able to strike dime-sized targets from hundreds of miles away with laser-guided missiles, precision radar equipment, and state of the art aircraft capable of flying well over 1,300 mph, could not locate, engage, nor intercept four wandering jumbo jets. A military that has a budget larger than the combined military assets of every other country in the world could not scramble, intercept and engage any of the radically wayward planes. Even Flight 77, which was allowed to fly unimpeded and crash into the Pentagon one full hour after two jets had been flown into the Twin Towers in NYC, failed to elicit the response and intercept from any military jets. Nor, indeed, did flight 93. A plane that crashed in a Pennsylvania field 1 hour and 45 minutes after the first plane was confirmed hijacked.

Read more from this guy here.

.../...

I hate, Hate HATE conspiracy theories. But it is becoming increasingly clear that all the false-flag or whatever weirdness behind 911 is the same sort of subterfuge that resulted in Michelle Obama becoming First Lady.

ACHTUNG! Stuka Flugzeuge! The Mealy-Mouthed History Contortionists At The New York Times Send A Salvo Of Mind Weapon Stuka Bombers Straight Into The Bullseye Of Western Accomplishment

Th2MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

The duplicitous reality reversers of Amerika's newspaper of record today published two wonderful articles that pound down another set of rusty square nails into the coffin of Western pre-eminence.



In the first article in question, advertised right there in the index strip on the bottom of the front page that is the most valuable publishing real estate on planet earth, the disgusting weasels at the New York Times entreat readers to turn to page A11-17 to read about a feature entitled: "Bones Testify To Cannibalism." When we saw that I knew immediately that something was up, because why would the vermin at the NYT ever put an article on cannibalism on their front page?

Answer: to confuse their readers by plunging them into contrived historical dystopia and further debase the image of America's Anglo Saxon founding stock.

As this Vice Guide to Liberia video clearly demonstrates, cannibalism is still very much alive in certain parts of the world, but why again would the Grey Lady report today on an alleged   American variation thereof? And on their front page no less?

Before even this answer was readily apparent (hangover), with my usual wariness I delved into the Times' article on the so-called "cannibalism" at Jamestown (the first permanent English settlement in America), and as sure as Obama's middle name starts with the letter "H," the Times did not fail to disappoint.

From the article "Bones Testify" :

Archaeologists excavating a trash pit at the Jamestown colony site in Virginia have found the first physical evidence of cannibalism among the desperate population, corroborating written accounts left behind by witnesses. Cut marks on the skull and skeleton of a 14-year-old girl show that her flesh and brain were removed, presumably to be eaten by the starving colonists during the harsh winter of 1609.

"The first physical evidence of cannibalism," they say, as if a pre-Stone Age practice that is in fact to this day a common and uniquely african trait, was as ordinary back then as tall ships and funny hats.

In the Times' defense, the article does provide some dispassionate historical trivia :

James Horn, a historian with the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, said at a news conference on Wednesday that the young woman probably had arrived on one of the six surviving ships from a supply fleet that sailed from Plymouth, England, in early June of 1609. A week short of its destination, the fleet was scattered by a hurricane. The flagship, named the Sea Venture, which carried the expedition’s leaders, was driven onto reefs at Bermuda, an event that became the inspiration for Shakespeare’s play “The Tempest,” Dr. Horn said.

How-evah, the last few paragraphs of the Times' article are ripe with sickeningly dishonest attempts at historical revisionism:

In mid-August, six of the ships eventually reached Jamestown. But their arrival, with little food and many extra mouths, did not bring relief or comfort. The settlers’ insistent demands for food antagonized the Powhatan Indians, who at first had welcomed and provisioned them. In October or early November, with about 300 colonists crowded into the narrow confines of the James fort, the Powhatans launched a full-scale attack and siege, cutting off any hope of outside relief.

With wily and clever economy of words, the Times manages here to cast the local savages - who had in fact not the wheel, barely mastered fire or any other post-caveman endeavor,  and could more accurately be described as existing not in the Stone Age but in the "stick age" - as perfect gentle specimens of the Noble Savage Myth. Sort of like the characters you'd imagine would appear in a New York Times Cliff Notes for "Django Unchained," were it to be drafted for a future alien invader population from outer space.

Mark Twain himself would surely have appended the NYT article with a few Reminders To The Reader on the savagery of the Red Man. The New York Times, of course, in their pursuit of Universal Equalism even through the ages, has no time for Twain and his thoughts on the "Noble Red Man." Which btw start like this :

"He loves the dark-eyed daughter of the forest, the dusky maiden of faultless form and rich attire, the pride of the tribe, the all-beautiful. He talks to her in a low voice, at twilight of his deeds on the war-path and in the chase, and of the grand achievements of his ancestors; and she listens with downcast eyes, "while a richer hue mantles her dusky cheek." 

Such is the Noble Red Man in print. But out on the plains and in the mountains, not being on dress parade, not being gotten up to see company, he is under no obligation to be other than his natural self, and therefore:
He is little, and scrawny, and black, and dirty; and, judged by even the most charitable of our canons of human excellence, is thoroughly pitiful and contemptible. There is nothing in his eye or his nose that is attractive, and if there is anything in his hair that--however, that is a feature which will not bear too close examination . . . He wears no bracelets on his arms or ankles; his hunting suit is gallantly fringed, but not intentionally; when he does not wear his disgusting rabbit-skin robe, his hunting suit consists wholly of the half of a horse blanket brought over in the Pinta or the Mayflower, and frayed out and fringed by inveterate use. He is not rich enough to possess a belt; he never owned a moccasin or wore a shoe in his life; and truly he is nothing but a poor, filthy, naked scurvy vagabond, whom to exterminate were a charity to the Creator's worthier insects and reptiles which he oppresses. Still, when contact with the white man has given to the Noble Son of the Forest certain cloudy impressions of civilization, and aspirations after a nobler life, he presently appears in public with one boot on and one shoe--shirtless, and wearing ripped and patched and buttonless pants which he holds up with his left hand--his execrable rabbit-skin robe flowing from his shoulder--an old hoop-skirt on, outside of it--a necklace of battered sardine-boxes and oyster-cans reposing on his bare breast--a venerable flint-lock musket in his right hand--a weather-beaten stove-pipe hat on, canted "gallusly" to starboard, and the lid off and hanging by a thread or two; and when he thus appears, and waits patiently around a saloon till he gets a chance to strike a "swell" attitude before a looking-glass, he is a good, fair, desirable subject for extermination if ever there was one.

(ps: for further kicks and giggles, check out this funny college dissertation on Twain's essay cited above: "COLFA Research Paper Competition: Huck Finn's Indian Complexion - Student Status: M.A. Graduate Student - Department: English - Supervisor: Dr. Jeanne Reesman").

*sigh*

The second NYT Disinformation Stuka bomber unleashed today on the Memory of the West is a giddy Times hatefest directed at old white dudes in England who may or may not have fondled some random floozy forty years ago in a BBC dressing room, and who today find themselves under arrest and assaulted by a sick society that is officially forbidden not only to identify its true adversaries, but also to prevent said foes from invading and reverse-colonizing Britannia (read: the inventors of and the foot soldiers for La Guerre du Grand Remplacement), entitled "British Stars of Yesteryear Find Themselves In Sights of Sexual Offence Inquiry".

Talk about mis-channelled anger !

From that ludicrous page A09 NYT article :

The operation involves at least 69 police officers and staff members and has already cost more than $2.7 million, according to figures obtained by The Independent newspaper through a Freedom of Information Act request.

The result has been a flurry of arrests, about a dozen involving very public people. But even as women’s rights advocates and others applaud a new era of openness, in which once-cowed victims feel able to speak out, lawyers for the high-profile suspects say that in the current climate, the accusers appear to be going out of their way to opportunistically target celebrities. And, they say, many of the accusations — of gropings, lewd behavior and drunken passes, as well as sex that seemed consensual at the time — have more to do with the anything-goes culture of the era than with any criminal behavior.

**double sigh**

Tne New York Times: Criminally Complicit In Re-Directing The Sheeple's Wrath Away From The True Enemy, Since 1981.