Chinese Stolen Technology Shitmobile Vs German-Made Crash Test

Sat31MarMMXII-Clk2Enlrg

Chinks lose !

As Marine Le Pen Shakes Up The Old-World NWO In France, The New York Times Conspicuously And Criminally Underreports Her Reach

Steven Erlanger (email him here) is the Times' main man in France. As such, he has of course been covering the phenomenal avancée dans les sondages (surging in the polls) of Marine LePen,  the 42-year old daughter of National Front founder Jean Marine LePen, who is perhaps the most detested public figure in all of France, as decided by the media elites there.

You may remember the pitiful case of Dominique Strauss Kahn, from last summer. This disgusting little French Socialist Party pervert was busted at the Sofitel in New York City last May for allegedly coaxing some even-more disgusting West-african immigrant asylum cheat invader room-cleaning diversity pig, Diaffoo Whatever, to going down on his wilting, graying member in a 3k-a night suite.

Gawd!, it's all so effing gross.

Turns out that after being released from Riker's Island, Strauss Kahn - who it was all but a given that this POS was going to be the next president of France (with the solid backing of the NWO diversity fanatics at the New York Times)  - went on national tv and told the Katie Couric of France (Laurence Ferrarri) that he had made a grave "moral error" (by coming in the mouth of an African maid/prostitute) then went on to say on the national nightly news with a straight face that the sure and only answer for all of France's woes was (wait for it) more immigration. 


*sigh*

So as the French are finally starting to wake up to what is really going on, and you have a proper nationalist candidate who has a real chance of making historic gains in the upcoming APril 26th French presidential election, naturally the verminous reality contortionists at Amerika's Newspaper of Record are doing everything they can to downplay the very real ascendancy of Marine Le Pen (who by the way if you speak French - or even if you don't - check her out on You Tube. This woman is a powerhouse of an orator and a debater, you will see this irregardless of your political leanings).

Here's but a tiny example of the disgusting ideological double-play coming from the NYT, in their criminal attempt to silence-out the understandable rise of Marine Le Pen in the polls in France :

Quoi? No one is suggesting that the candidates inspired French-Algerian anti-semite Mohammed Merah to shoot an 8-year-old girl in the head (after her grabbing her by the hair to get a better shot) ?

That is exactly what the New York Times is doing here.

Mister Erlanger: if you're reading this: you Sir are guilty of criminal disinformation. One day soon you will be judged for your crimes.

The New York Times: Sicking The Verminous Lying Steven Erlangers Of This Planet Upon An Otherwise Wise And Peaceful Earth Since 1999.

This Is All You Really Need To Know... To Understand Our American Trayvon-O-Mania

(We're keepin; it brief, we're keepin' it real here at COTT) :

"Parents of murdered British students criticise Barack Obama"

Trayvon-O-Mania Round 10,999

Thu 29 MarMMXII- Clk2Enlrg

"For Skittles, Death Brings Both Profit And Risk"

From the article :














*sigh*

Fight The Lies Of The Times! - Beat Their Paywall (For Starters)

Wed28MarsMMXII-Clk 2 Enlrg

It's easy: simply delete in the URL everything after the question mark that usually appears after "html," including the question mark itself.

The New York Times is an evil institution who holds your best interests in contempt. They have taken the philosophy behind their do-gooder credo "To comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable" to sickening and psychotic extremes.

The psychotic diversity enforcers at Amerika's newspaper of record are hell-bent on equalizing society no matter what. They are the ultimate Pol Pot communists of this sick world. Make no mistake, their ideology is so extreme, that if they could (commit violence in furtherance of their utopian agenda) they would.

The four-eyed eunuchs of forty-second street have a rabid hatred for the natural winners of the earth, namely the men who made Western Civilization the global unifying force that it is, and their pasty-faced modern day heirs who keep the plates spinning despite the best efforts of the Pol Pot enablers of forty-second street.

The diseased minds at the Times want all humans to be exactly equal in attainment, and by "all humanity" the Times sincerely, serenely, with the straight face of a delusional utopian, believes that if four-foot-seven football-shaped mestizos from the highlands of Bolivia and six-foot-two blonde-haired blue eyed beauties from downtown Stockholm somehow have unequal outcomes in life, then there is something wrong with global society, and this society needs to be re-engineered from the ground up.

Such is the mission of the verminous reality contortionists at Amerika's newspaper of record.

It is our mission to expose the dark and sinister agenda that fuels the dark little elitist hearts of the Times' editorial board.

Bear with us here, we're just getting started.

The New York Times: An Unworthy Adversary If Ever There Were One, Since 1958.

Trayvon-O-Mania Round 3,892: Guardian Angels Founder Curtis Sliwa Sees The Face Of Robert DeNiro In "White Hispanic*" George Zimmerman; The New York Times Piles On With Gleeful Abandon

(*As we have seen, a quick search of their records reveals that from 1851 on, the New York Times has never, ever used the term "white hispanic," except until March 2012, when it became expedient in their ongoing campaign to frame the Trayvon Martin killing in the predictable narrative of poor oppressed black youth vs. evil racist white society at large.)

So it looks like Curtis Sliwa of Guardian Angels fame has jumped on the Trayvon-o-mania bandwagon, with full support from the rapacious reality reversers at Amerika's newspaper of record.

From today's Letters to the Editor:

This story just gets more and more preposterous, and predictably the verminous little eunuchs at the New York Times, instead of backing down and throwing a bone or two to the Gods of Reasonableness, plunge deeper and deeper into the cesspool of the make-believe black victimhood at the hands of evil oppressive racist white society, narrative.

Don't Forget To Beat The Times' Paywall - It's Easy !

Fri 23 MarMMXII - Clk 2 Enlrg

It's easy.

Plus: I get the impression that the psychotic pinko propaganda clowns at the New York Times have realized that between hiking their newsstand rate to 2.50$ two months ago, making readers pay to read online content,  and leaping head long into the deep end of the NWO politically correct pool, ordinary people are starting to catch on (thanks internets!) and understand the sinister anti-Western agenda that is the cornerstone of the Times' commitment to uplift the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable.

To get past the paywall: simply erase the question mark in the URL that appears right after "HTML," and everything after it.

The New York Times Puts A Curious Spin On The Inconvenient Ethnicity Of Trayvon (Huh?) Martin Shooter George Zimmerman

From "A Florida Law Gets Scrutiny After A Teenager's Killing":

WTF is a "white Hispanic"? Does this guy look white to you: 

The lying little weasels at Amerika's newspaper of record so want this to turn young Trayvon (huh?) into a martyr that they'll put Mario here in whiteface, even though to do this exposes them for the mendacious reality reversers that they really are.

Similarly, the Times wants you to believe that this white Hispanic called Trayvon (wha?)  a "nig*er" :

One day and hopefully it will be soon, the verminous reality contortionists of forty-second street are going to get what they have coming to them. Their lies will not be able to survive the Those Who Can See movement.

The New York Times Boldly And Courageously Explores The Question: "Why Are Some Nations Rich, Others Poor?"

Mon 19 Mar MMXII-Clk 2 Enlrg

"Why Some Nations Go Bust"

HBD Realism And Momentary Relief From The Lying Weasels At The NYT: "Stranger At My Gate" By Rudyard Kipling

The Stranger within my gate,
He may be true or kind,
But he does not talk my talk--
I cannot feel his mind
I see the face and the eyes and mouth
But not the soul behind.

The men of my own stock,
They may do ill or well,
But they tell the lies I am wonted to,
They are used to the lies I tell;
And we do not need interpreters
When we go to buy and sell.

The stranger within my gates
He may be evil or good
But I cannot tell what powers control,
What reasons sway his mood;
Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
Shall repossess his blood.

The men of my own stock,
Bitter bad they may be,
But at least they hear the things I hear
And see the things I see;
And whatever I think of them and their likes,
They think of the likes of me.

This was my father's belief,
And this is also mine:
Let all the corn be one sheaf
And the grapes be all one vine
Ere our children's teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.

Rigid Conformity To An Ideological Template In Furtherance Of A Dark And Sinister Agenda: More Predictable Dishonesty From The Demonic Public Policy Influencers At Amerika's Newspaper Of Record

Sun18MarsMMXII - Clk 2 Enlrg

Every day the anti-establishment (read: "anti-majority") smut published in the pages of the Crimes of the New York Times seems more outrageous to me. Is it mere observer bias or is the New York Times really getting worse day by day?

Is it just that we're paying closer attention, or are the elites of Forty Second Street really turning up the volume on their full-on onslaught against Western Civilization?

Answer: first one, not the latter.

Because the rapacious rat-hearted reality reversers at the Times truly are starting to realize that the gig is up, and that people in the West are catching on to their Great Replacement Agenda, they are in fact ramping up the propaganda. There is no question about it.

This cannot possibly end well.

Exhibit A in this assertion: today's Sunday Times Edition, which includes no fewer than 6 - SIX - full-on pro-homo propaganda puff pieces.

It's starting to feel more and more like the New York Times commence each and every news day with a blank template, that they seek at all cost to fill in with pre-hashed ideological Puff. The evidence (presented below) bears this out more and more.

In other words, it's starting to look more and more like the verminous reality contortionists in the Editorial Board Room of Amerika's newspaper of record are determined to every day publish a story that conforms to one of several of their several core areas of interest (minority uplift, anti-Westernism, NWOism, afflicting the comfortable and comforting the afflicted, Indeed!).

Today Sunday is of course no exception. We spotted in today's thick six-dollar Sunday edition no fewer than 6 - SIX ! - pro-homo propaganda puff pieces. They are listed below here on COTT :

Judge for yourselves :

(1) "Is Tammy Baldwin Our First Gay Senator?" : The NYT pedestalized a lesbian Senator, in today's Sunday Magazine ;

(2) "To Be A Hotel And Gay In New York" : Gay Times contributor talks about gay-friendly hotels in Manhattan (creep-out alert) ;

(3) "One Schlep Forward" : The story of a gay rabbi who comes out at the age of 46, as told by his (the gay rabbi's) son in the Times' Sunday Magazine.

From that sick, sick sick article :

(4) "Trial Repudiates Notion Of Youth As Defense" : More whining about the Rutgers University gay kid who offed himself from the GW Bridge (even though the accused is an Indian diversity - Dot not Feather);

(5) "Flagrant Conduct - The Story Of Lawrence Vs. Texas" : From the Times' once-esteemed Book Review, which has been reduced in the past couple of years to a disgusting propaganda platform for the Times' over-the-top promotion of anti-Western values Everywhere, the story of two low-life pervs caught in "flagrant délit" butt thex by Houston cops in 1998, and the resulting pro-homo-agenda that made its way all the way to the United States Supreme Court.

From the disgusting "Flagrant Conduct" article from the NYT Book Review :

 

(6) "Aids Warriors: The Living After The Dying" : By this point, you get the picture.

On a Sunday, NO nation's Newspaper Of Record should devote half a DOZEN articles to justifying, promoting, blame-shifting for, and excusing butt thex.

The New York Times: Claiming Butt Thex Is Enlightened Conduct  Since 1998.

De-Irishing The Irish on Saint Patty's Day

"It's About Immigrants, Not Irishness"

From the article :

That's right. Some more:

 

 TDTC (too depressed to comment)

*Sigh*

On Saint Patty's Day, The New York Times Spits In The Face Of The Irish With A Triple-Whammy Minority Propaganda Puff Piece From Flyover Country

Sat17 Mars MMXII - Clk to Enlrg 

This is nauseating even by New York Times standards: in a patently pervy pro-minority propaganda puff piece entitled "An Irish Tradition With An Only-In-America Star" that appeared on page A10 of today's national edition, Times communist Sabrina Tavernise gives us the story of an Irish boy, Drew Lovejoy, who "could not be more American."


Continue reading at your own peril (barf bags recommended).









From the article :

Yeah, I'm feeling down about the United States and its diminished place in the world, a downgrade made possible by the relentless attacks on traditional society brought forth by the treasonous elites at Amerika's newspaper of record, thanks for asking Sabrina.

The star diversity in this article has it all: he's black, he's Jewish, he's obviously gay, and he can dance!:

 And it gets better. In addition to being a model minority - a model minority by the Times' standards  anyway - little Drew is also a tireless crusader for racial justice, plus he's got lots of stories about evil white Ohio racists that might also even be Irish:

Talk about taking a big steaming dump on the heads of Irish people everywhere. Move aside Mick, we have an enlightened hybrid Irish hero now, your kind ain't welcome around here no more.

This stuff seems to get more nauseating by the day at the New York Times. It's like they are winning, and they are rubbing our noses in it big time.

War Of The Diversities: The Rainbow-Flag-Waving Civilization Wreckers At The New York Times Bust Out The Party Balloons As The Rutgers Diversity Accused Of Bullying The Wrong Diversity Is Found Guilty Of Hate Bullying (Whatever That Means)

Fri16MarsMMXII - Clk 2 Enlrg

"Defendant in Rutgers Spying Case Guilty of Hate Crimes"


Impossible hypocrite pussies that they are, the Diversity Enforcers of Forty-Second Street have officially made their position on Protected Pet Minority Status clear: it's gay diversity over ethnic diversity, Whoo-Hah ! 


The pugnacious propaganda profferers at Amerika's newspaper of record have been obsessing over the whole Rutgers so-called gay-bashing incident from day one. For those of you who've been on a sailboat in the middle of the Atlantic since 1968, a quick summary: Indian (Dot not Feather) import and Rutgers diversity student Dharun Ravi, two years ago was creeped out by his creepy gay white roommate Tyler Clementi and the latter's even creepier association with a 30 year old homosexual with whom even Creepier-er was meeting in the Rutgers students' shared dorm for butt-thex. The Indian (Dot not Feather) trained the web-cam on his Chinese-built Dell computer on the lower bunk, and alerted his University buds (mostly fellow diversities) to tune in for full-on gross-out. 


They did. Suicidal white kid who probably would have snuffed it sooner or later anyways, snuffs it the next day, from the pedestrian platform of the George Washington Bridge, the New York Times and the GBLT community the Times basically lives for went berserk. I mean Crazy, with a capital "C". 


Take home : The NYT cares more about suicidal fags than Indians (Dot not Feather). 


*Sigh*                                                     


From the article : 

Mr. Ravi’s roommate, Tyler Clementi, jumped to his death from the George Washington Bridge three days after Mr. Ravi viewed him on the webcam. The case became a symbol of the struggles facing gay, lesbian and bisexual teenagers and the problem of cyberbullying in an era when laws governing hate crimes have not kept up with evolving technology.

The New York Times: When It Comes To Choosing Which Pet Minorities They Really Care About, It Looks Like: Fag, Yes√; Indians (Dot Not Feather), Not So Much ;-( .

With Ball-Busting Sneakiness, The Lying Diversity Kommissars At The New York Paint An Altogether False Picture Of Last Year's London Riots

Creeping incrementalism, and true to form in their furtherance of Doctor Goebbel's Golden Propaganda Rule : "Tell a lie long enough, and it will become the truth."

Every single article relating to the Tottenham riots written but this little worm John Burns, attempts to play down the true ethnic nature of the "disturbances." He describes Mark Duggan - the armed ghetto dweller who was killed by London cops, who used to be kindly, quaint and unarmed but now carry weapons because of the presence of the Mark Duggans Burns defends - as an oppressed youth needlessly gunned down by racist white cops. It is unbelievable, the lies that shamelessly come out of this disgusting rag.

I called out Burns on his unfair reporting by email, and he quickly replied with a squealing retort (guilty conscious?), claiming that it was I the weasel because I voiced my disapproval from behind the safety of my computer screen, whatever that means.

For an excellent analysis of the Tottenham riots, and the deteriorating state of civil society in England today, please check out "The Baggage of the World" from our friends over at Sarah, Maid Of Albion.

From "Baggage" :

In light of Sarah's piece above, an interesting historical fact relative to Enoch Powell's famous "Rivers of Blood Speech": the night of the speech and in the days that followed, Powell's office was flooded with thousands of telegrams and hundreds of letters. Ninety-seven percent were in support of Powell and his message. And yet the elites in the British government not only silenced Powell by removing him from his MP post, they also did the exact opposite of Powell, the anti-elites and the vast majority of British society were calling for, namely steep reductions in Third World immigration.

If you believe John Burns and the ravenous reality reversers at the New York Times, you probably think I'm lying, right?

Answer:

Source is here.

The New York Times: Outright Lies In The Name Of The Great Replacement Agenda Since 1973.

Utterly Failing To Grasp The Bigger Message Behind Kony 2012: More Embarrassing Drivel From Nicholas Kristof

"Viral Video, Vicious Warlord"

From the article :

And then...

Lying little weasel.

Epic Blame-Shift Fail From The Incorrigible Afrophiliacs At The New York Times

Tue 13 Mars MMXII - Clk2Enlrg

"Drug Policy As Race Policy: Best Seller Galvanizes The Debate"

"New Orleans Police Say Officer In Shootout Found Bullet Inside His Taser"

The verminous majority-hating afrophile reality contortionists at the New York Times have twice in the past week given voice to a race-hustling light-skinned professional black woman named Michelle Alexander, who just published a book - entitled "The New Jim Crow" - which seeks to place the blame for America's over-the-top incarceration rates on evil  "systemic racism."

Miss Alexander is one of those race-hustlers à la Louis Gates that the Times just loves loves loves.

She claims that the "War on Drugs" disproportionately targets young men of color, blah blah blah.

Michelle Alexander's Blame-Whitey
For Negro Criminality Screed 

The problem I have with the race-reality deniers and their enablers at the New York Times, is that on a weekly basis, here in New Orleans, I read stories such as this:

"20 Year-Old Black Male Burger King Employee Shot Dead By Cops After He Empties 14-Bullet Clip  In Deadly Shootout".

So on the one hand, you have barely twenty-year old ICBMs (inner city black males), on their way to mopping the floors at Burger King, who think nothing of an early-morning shootout with the cops, which is the norm.

On the other hand, you have NYT-supported disingenuous race-hustlers like Michelle Alexander, who have full license to explain away the innate criminality of the young african american male, as this criminality is wholly encouraged by the policy-influenzers at such treasonous publications as the New York Times.

It is precisely because of the propaganda that spews forth from the pages of the NYT every day, that such criminality is not only commonplace, it is accepted by the masses as a necessary pathology rooted in white social racial dysfunction.

From a NYT review of Michelle Alexander's book :

BUT, from the most recent NOLA.com (Times Picayune) story of the type of barbaric violent criminality here in New Orleans that results from the blame-shifting and reality-reversal commonly excused away by the afro-uplift lunatics at the New York Times :

Watch the video of one of the dead chillens grandmammies :

More New Orleans crime (search to watch video screen-shot below)  :

"Officer With Search Warrant Shoots, Kills 20-Year-Old Man"

Grandmother  New Orleans Fatal Shooting Victim Wendell Allen
Speaks To The Press: Click Here to Watch Vid
 (The New Orleans Crimes Picayune
 Is Not Sophisticated Enough To Enable Embedding)
PS: listen carefully (twice) to this woman's testimony.
 She states that there were eleven
(11 FFS!) children in the house at the time of the shooting. 

The problem alas is intractable. When you look at this video of this grieving grandmother claiming her  daughter's bastard spawn "din do nuffins," it is clear as a bell for all Those Who Can See that this poor oppressed government-sustainee (housed, fed, clothes at taxpayer expense) is more concerned with assigning blame for the good chillen's untimely death (yes, she actually says, at minute .25 "I want da Man, to come and tell me, that it was justified, to go into that house, and kill all dem little babies. Dey was five littel ones inside. Das his mama house. Talk to the coaches in the basketball field. He a basketball playah he a football playah") than she is concerned with the fact that there has been a death in the fambly. In other words: and the New York Times will never touch on this with a ten foot pole: blacks do not seem to value the lives of their own kind, the way other people (asians, whites, etc.) do. It's weird the way that works.

To conclude: I'm sorry: but once again the New York Times is turning the reality of the issue upside-down.

In a sane society, a nation's newspaper of record would be talking honestly about the factors that lead a high-crime minority to wipe itself out practically, through gun violence.

But America, indeed the West, is not sane. The West is more un-sane thank insane.

The New York Times: Un-Sane Since 1965.

Monday, 12 March MMXII

Saturday - Don't Forget to Beat The Times' Paywall

Sat 10 MarsMMXII-Clk 2 Enlrg

It's easy : simply delete everything in the URL after the question mark (?), including the question mark (?).

Back to regular posting tomorrow.

Have a nice day.

- Arturo

The Dunning Kruger Effect Explains Everything

"People Aren't Smart Enough For Democracy To Flourish, Scientists Say"

And to think that the New York Times wet dreams about democracy for Africa!

From the article :

Beating Inequality Over The Head With A Very Large Stick

Wed7MarsMMXII - Clk 2 Enlrg

"E.U. Considers Quotas For Women In Boardrooms"














From the article :

And....

Amazingly, this article generated the following comment (amazing that the diversity enforcers at the Times allowed it to be published - maybe it was a mistake?) :

• 
  Judy Shimkus
• St Louis, MO

FLAG

Yes, but there will always be inequality, no matter what opportunities are offered to everyone. People are not equally endowed with intelligence, aptitude, energy and the "work ethic", to mention a few things. 

Poverty and inequality will never go away. How could they?


The New York Times: Prosecuting A War On The Natural Order Since 1923. 

Dunning-Kruger and NYT Reality Reversal Writ Large: A depressing State of Affairs For Those Who Can See

Tue 6 MArs MMXII-Clk 2 Enlrg

I'm so sick of it, I don't know how much more of it I can take; I don't know how much longer I can continue this stupid blog, which I hate because it is nothing but negative. For that is what the world is today: an upside-down dystopia wherein the ancestors of Lewis and Clark are hated and reviled, and upon which all the woes of the world are placed upon their unsuspecting lily white high-achieving descendants.

The verminous reality contortionists at the New York Times are responsible in part for turning reality on its head - at the very least, they are a cog in the machine that seeks to *equalize* all things, all peoples, all civilizations, at the expense of course of the Times' core victim demographic: namely the Western Civilizations that have mapped out how to live for the rest of humanity since contact was first made between ancient Euros and the Noble Savages of Africa, some five hundred years ago.

Today, anywhere you go on a Boeing wide-body, all of the standards, from the language of the air traffic control tower to the width of the runway to the very nomenclature of the position in the skies of the sun and moon (as in, "Monday"," Tuesday" -  the calendar FFS) , are the direct result of Western innovation/intervention. From indoor plumbing to straight-leg jeans to twice-weekly trash pickup, every single one of these innovations that the so-called "developing world" (read: "striving to live up to whitey standards world") is the legacy of Western munificence towards radically different human groups.

Today, the world runs on a grid that was created by the most detested *minority* on the planet, namely White Euros. In the deepest reaches of China or the most disease-ridden corners of Africa, where the "sons of cannibals have been thrust in to the atomic age," everywhere Western Civilization sets the standard for human development. While at the same time, everywhere Western Civilization is universally vilified.

And everywhere on the plant, the psychotic diversity enforcers of Forty Second Street continue to uplift the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable, at the expense of humanity as a whole.

How?, Why? is such an influential organ of public policy propaganda as the New York Times able in this day and age of universal internets access to maintain its edge?

Answer: the sinister agenda they promote, has borne fruit over the years. In a word, they are winning.

The dissenters who read blogs like this one must redouble their efforts, if we are to have any effect whatsoever.

*Sigh*

Reminder: Beat The Times Paywall

It's easy.

Plus: I get the impression that the psychotic pinko propaganda clowns at the New York Times have realized that between hiking their newsstand rate to 2.50$ two months ago, making readers pay to read online content,  and leaping head long into the deep end of the NWO politically correct pool, ordinary people are starting to catch on (thanks internets!) and understand the sinister anti-Western agenda that is the cornerstone of the Times' commitment to uplift the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable.

To get past the paywall: simply erase the question mark in the URL that appears right after "HTML," and everything after it.

Playing Whack-A-Mole With The Patriarchal Old World Order, One Orwellian Dose of "Progress" At A Time

Mon 5 MArs MMXII-Clk 2 Enlr

"E.U. Considers Quotas For Women In Boardrooms"

When will these assassins of tradition and all that Western Civilization is founded upon be satisfied?

Answer: never.

At least not in your lifetime.









From the article :

 

Out Of The Mouths Of Babes...

Sat3MArsMMXII - Clk 2 Enlrg

"Resentment Towards The West Bolsters Uganda's New Anti-Gay Bill"

So this is how it ends: insane NWO competitive compassion contestants in the West pushing civilization-destroying homosexuality in the four corners of the globe. Even the tiniest resistance is met with punishing sanctions.

Somebody needs to send a memo to the New York Times and the USG whose policies are informed by the NYT' propaganda: you cannot upend primitive societies using the same formulas you have used to destroy the West. Funny the way that works (irony alert!) : if the Times would put aside their own HBD-denying policies for a moment, they could be a lot more effective in moulding African "society" to their designs, as they have done everywhere in the West.

The Times and the USG are caught up here in the contradictions of their own egalitarian. They're telling their pets and protectees the Africans:  if you won't accept sodomy lying down (pun), then we'll be cutting off the financial aid that allows you to have have indoor toilets, antiretroviral drugs, and high-speed internet.

Not the food aid that keeps you plump and healthy enough to speed breed, no, that after all is your human right.

This is more evidence that the West's way of dealing with Africans is akin to an out of touch, mega rich white guy whose wife left him, and who punishes his daughter's bad behavior by taking away her American Express card, but leaving her with the Lexus SUV and a Prada purse full of cash.



From the article :

And: though everybody knows that blacks in Africa and in America too claim to be vehemently opposed to the Down Lo lifestyle, since this group can do no wrong in the eyes of the Times regardless of their continent of residence, the verminous reality reversers of Forty Second Street have to place blame where blame is always due when it comes to black dysfunction: on evil whitey (who else?): 

And: the face of who is really behind this sinister campaign: 

Montana: Judge Sends Racist Joke About Obama...

Fri2MarsMMXII - Clk 2 Enlrg

...squeals the New York Times.

If you're like me, you're axing: "So where's the joke?"

Obviously, the diversity-enforcing elites at the Times are too busy buffing the glowing halo that hovers  over their pointy heads to give us this joke.

So I will:

"A little boy said to his mother; ‘Mommy, how come I’m black and you’re white?’ His mother replied, ‘Don’t even go there Barack! From what I can remember about that party, you’re lucky you don’t bark!" 

Cymbals!

Despite Their Feverish Desire To Stamp It Out Wherever It Rears Its Ugly Head, HBD Realism Pops Up Rather Loudly In The Otherwise Impeccably Propagandized Pages Of Today's NYT

"The Monkey House Ends a 111-Year Run in The Bronx"

"Scandal At The Zoo" (2006)

From the first article :

OOPS ! 

From the 2006 article cited in today's "Monkey House" :

Ota Benga, 1904 

What's especially revealing about this little imbroglio - "unthinkable today" writes the Times - is the way their dead colleagues brushed it off in 1906. In responding to the "scandal" brought to the public's attention by a handful of rabble rousing black preachers and their DWL minister protectors, the New York Times said :

The New York Times:  Once They Got It Right; Not Anymore