|1/27/11 - Click to Enlarge|
In an article which makes the Trojan Horse tactic look like child's play, "Forecast Sees Muslim Population Leveling Off", also entitled "Report Offers Surprises on Muslims' Growth," Times communist Laurie Goldstein gives us a puff piece of population propaganda on page A8 of today's national edition. The article sites research conducted in a new report by the Pew Research Center's Forum on Religion and Public Life (a "non-partisan research group," the NYT helpfully reminds us), that wants to make you believe that Muslims are not outbreeding non-Muslims after all, thank you very much.
From the article:
"[The report]... could challenge assertions by some scholars and far-right political parties about future demographic domination by Muslims."How unenlightened of those far-right wingers!
The article continues:
"'There's this overwhelming assumption that Muslims are populating the earth, and not only are they growing at this exponential rate in the Muslim world, they're going to be dominating Europe and soon after, the United States,' she said. 'But the figures don't even come close. I'm looking at all this and wondering, where is all the hysteria coming from?'"Umm...may we attempt to address this useful idiot woman's question about where "all the hysteria is coming from," please?
Answer: Iranian hostage crisis (thanks Jimmy), 9/11, London, Madrid and Paris bombings, Moscow airport bombings, Beslan school attack, daily suicide bombings, honor killings, stoning women to death, marrying off 9 year olds, the Danish cartoons, the Paris riots of November 2005, countless Islamic leaders telling us over and over again that Muslims will conquer Europe through the bellies of their women... etc etc ?
Might any of that explain a little of the "hysteria"? Perhaps?
The New York Times is a truly disgusting newspaper. It is a criminal enterprise that deviously shapes public policy, a crime for which the Times is all the more culpable by the fact that there are very few low-IQ people who write for it.
Which is an interesting topic that we will examine in a later post: the correlation between higher intelligence and criminal intent. In other words, in the same way that an idiot or a retard can claim innocence by reason of insanity in a court of law, should not the super-intelligent be held accountable on a higher plain for their crimes? After all, if one is hugely intelligent and hugely deviant, the impact of their misdeeds will certainly be greater than that of an illiterate one-eyed beggar who steals a can of food.
Should not the super-smart be judged more severely when they commit a criminal act? Should not the super-smart - those capable of using their intelligence to wipe out an entire people, as Hitler did - be judged differently than the super-dumb?
But we digress....
It is sick and indeed criminal the way the elitist reality shifters at Amerika's newspaper of record influence public policy - they know that their word will be considered undisputed, and that millions if not more impressionable idiots will conform to it.
Goldstein's puff piece today about how Muslim women are just soooooo like everybody else on the planet, is typical of the sick, criminal "sameism" that the NYT smears across their pages on a daily basis. A closer look at this stupid article reveals that the wishful thinking One Worlders at the Times make zero reference to what in a sane world would be a primary topic in an article about global demographic change: race.
From the article:
"The report suggests that economic and educational factors affect population growth rates among Muslims far more than the religious factor. In Iran, which encourages family planning and birth control, the fertility rate of only 1.7 children per woman resembles that of many European countries. It has the lowest fertility rate of any Muslim-majority nation, while Niger, a poor African nation, has the highest, at 6.9 children per woman. Iranian girls receive 15 years of schooling on average; in Niger, it is four years."The sickness at this newspaper knows no bounds: the Times wants you to believe that Tehran and Paris are 99% interchangeable, while the only reason that Nigerian woman still have 6.9 children on average is due to a lack of education, and to a lesser extent poor government policy.
The Times is simply too cowardly to discuss meaningful topics of race and demographics in an honest and forthright manner. Goldstein's article today attempts to portray group breeding rates as a function of religious affiliation and literacy, when we know that deeper behavioural trends are the root cause of large families in much of the world - especially among the world's poor, who continue to produce children they are unable to feed.
It is not a stretch to postulate that Western society is in such a state of decline today, as a direct result of influential voices like the NYT molding the opinions of the less informed (intelligent?) masses.
The New York Times: Delusional, Dishonest, Criminal Disservice to Humanity