The Lying, Verminous One-Worlders At Amerika's Newspaper of Record Dive Head-First Into The Deep End Of The HBD Debate-Pool...

Thu9MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

...and hit the diving board on the way down.

"Paper on Immigrant I.Q. Dogs Critics Of Immigration Overhaul"


Or did they?


According to the lion of the blogosphere* (formerly known as half sigma), instead of provoking a realistic debate about the true achievement potential of the legions of football-shaped mestizos from Mexico and Guatemala cleaning hotel rooms in the United States today, the emergence of this common sense policy paper is going to force Republicans to disavow it lest they be branded "racisst."

[Check out the fascinating comments there].

From the article (note the names of the NYT authors) :

The New York Times: Perpetuating Ashley Montague's Big Lie On Parade Since - Well, - Since 1946. 

NYT's Mosi Secret Reports: "Cyber Thieves Looted ATM's of 45 Million $ In Just Hours"

What the hell kind of name is "Mosi Secret"?

From the article:

Ah, the rewards of diversity and globalization. 

But what the hell kind of name is Mosi Secret? 

He further reports : 

Does The New York Times Have A Sense Of Humor?

Everybody's Heard Of The Rolling Stones Free Concert At Altamont Speedway In California, Where The Hells Angels Stabbed A Spectator To Death, But...

..... how many knew that the victim was an 18 year-old African American male named Meredith Hunter, who came to the show dressed like a pimp with his white girlfriend, and in possession of a .22 revolver, which he brandished at Mick Jagger while the band was trying to perform "Under My Thumb" ?

And (the plot thickens), how many reading here knew that Alan Passaro (Aug. 1948 - March 1985), the white Hells Angel who was tried for Hunter's Dec. 6th, 1969 stabbing death, was acquitted by a San Francisco jury in 1971, after the jury saw footage of the incident?

Plus: Meredith Hunter's mother sued the Rolling Stones for millions, but she lost on the strength of the footage shot by "Gimme Shelter" filmmaker David Maysles, which clearly shows that her boy Hunter was on a murderous rampage.

The Rolling Stones eventually gave Meredith Hunter's mother ten thousand dollars.



The New York Times: Has Absolutely Nothing To Do With This Story RIght Now, But I'm Sure That If They Did They Would Muddle Up The Facts Just Fine

Ten Million Bic Ball Point Pens Produced Every Day

Notice anything strange strange about Bic's annual report? :

"Chekist" (1992), Full Movie

This Russian film from two decades ago depicts the murderous zealotry of Marx's communist ideal.

The film takes place in about 1920 in a Russian town unnamed. There the local Chekist at the head of the local branch of the Soviet state security organization created by Lenin to crush "counter-revolutionary" activities, oversees the systematic execution of hundreds or more of his fellow countrymen.

After the execution of Tsar Nicholas and his family, the revolutionary bolsheviks went after mostly aristocrats, mercantile-types, and clergymen. Many of the murdered in "The Cheklist" are well-dressed bourgeois types representative of this target group.

With utter and drama-free Russian bluntness, this film illustrates what happens when an entire civilization is pissed off about something. Not to sound extreme, but it's almost like there is something healthy in the early soviets' designs to change society.

.../...

In the West today, the rage that broils just below the surface of every Western people, has for a long time been falsely diverted towards pseudo-threats such as global warming, obesity, second-hand tobacco smoke, seatbelt enforcement and road safety, etc..

Whereas in reality, the biggest threat to the West today is painfully and obviously to all Those Who Can See,  strictly demographic in nature.

When in London over half the population is now foreign-born, and where the most popular name for newborns is Muhammed, and where close to 80% of all births are to non-white, non-British mothers, then clearly we have a serious problem. Especially when this pattern repeats itself in virtually every "Western" country on the planet ! 

But instead of concentrating on the real source of the Decline, Western elites direct the natural, surging rage of their people into such safe haven issues as child safety seats, minority uplift, animal rights, prosecution for possession of pornography, etc ect.

With the film "Chekist," somehow it is deeply reassuring - while at the same time being horrible beyond comprehension - to realize that not even a century ago,  Eastern Europeans went to insanely extreme lengths to ensure the supremacy of their ideals.

"The Chekist" (1992) 

With Sinister Irony, The New York Times Publishes A Front Page Profile Piece Whose Title Describes Their Very Own Tactics

Sun5MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

"The Dark Side, Carefully Masked"

This portrait of the Muslim bomber monster downplays the motivating role of Islam in the attacks, has zero problem with the Muslim monster bomber's Chechen parents' cheating the American asylum system, and generally is sympathetic to the person of the Muslim monster bomber from Boston, no I'm not going to bother attempting to spell his stupid Muslim name correctly.

A disgusting mud puppy from the Islamic turd world using stupid liberal ideals and policies endorsed by the fanatical diversity enforcers at the NYT to slash at the soft, pretty pale face of the West.

Vermin at the New York Times: you did this.

(As Much As We Hate To Return There): The Scientists Have Spoken; The Architects And Engineers Have Spoken; The Political History Of Outside Influence Experts Have Spoken... Now, When Added To That Mix Are Aviation And Military Experts SUPPORTED In Their Assertions By "HBD Experts," Well...

A question you may not have heard: were 19 Arab Bedouinic Muslim  terrorists armed with box cutters and in possession of not one second of actual airborne flight training, really capable of piloting those slow-flying, difficult-to-maneuver jumbo jets with such deadly precision?

Consider that even the cleverest Islamic suicide bomber usually never manages to take out more than a few victims at a time, at best. (They were bested by Breivik in a pretty big way which they are no doubt jealous of).

Tatu Van Hanen and Richard Lynn in "IQ and the Wealth of Nations" calculate the average IQ of Saudi Arabians to be in about the upper 80s range, while other sources* show that a commercial jetliner requires a pilot to have an IQ almost two full standard deviations above that.

[Kwik tangentialization time: in another total HBD-realism Fail, the NYT published on the Front Page today an article on Egypt's frightening population explosion entitled, "As Egypt Birthrates Rise, Population Policy Vanishes", in which not a single word was uttered about : 1) the super-high rates of kin marriage in that country and in the Islamic world generally ; 2) the inarguably terrible physical and mental drawbacks that results from such cousin-marriage. In a sane society the press would be talking about kin marriage and IQ inhibitors all the time, but...]. /off/tangent/off//

In light of this HBD-aware theory (which summarized bluntly: the 911 hijackers did not possess the mind power to successfully pull off such a Massive Attack), consider the implausibility of the Official Narrative from the military / aviation point of view :

Before reviewing the military air defense response on 9/11, it is important to remember objectively what the 'official story' asks the public to believe. According to their narrative, on the morning of September 11, four enormous, fuel-laden, lumbering jumbo jets were hijacked by 19 Arab men with box-cutters and zero in-air flight experience. These slow, unmaneuverable planes were then flown for 1 hour and 45 minutes through the most restricted airspace in the world without eliciting a single military intercept. The most sophisticated military in the world, able to strike dime-sized targets from hundreds of miles away with laser-guided missiles, precision radar equipment, and state of the art aircraft capable of flying well over 1,300 mph, could not locate, engage, nor intercept four wandering jumbo jets. A military that has a budget larger than the combined military assets of every other country in the world could not scramble, intercept and engage any of the radically wayward planes. Even Flight 77, which was allowed to fly unimpeded and crash into the Pentagon one full hour after two jets had been flown into the Twin Towers in NYC, failed to elicit the response and intercept from any military jets. Nor, indeed, did flight 93. A plane that crashed in a Pennsylvania field 1 hour and 45 minutes after the first plane was confirmed hijacked.

Read more from this guy here.

.../...

I hate, Hate HATE conspiracy theories. But it is becoming increasingly clear that all the false-flag or whatever weirdness behind 911 is the same sort of subterfuge that resulted in Michelle Obama becoming First Lady.

ACHTUNG! Stuka Flugzeuge! The Mealy-Mouthed History Contortionists At The New York Times Send A Salvo Of Mind Weapon Stuka Bombers Straight Into The Bullseye Of Western Accomplishment

Th2MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

The duplicitous reality reversers of Amerika's newspaper of record today published two wonderful articles that pound down another set of rusty square nails into the coffin of Western pre-eminence.



In the first article in question, advertised right there in the index strip on the bottom of the front page that is the most valuable publishing real estate on planet earth, the disgusting weasels at the New York Times entreat readers to turn to page A11-17 to read about a feature entitled: "Bones Testify To Cannibalism." When we saw that I knew immediately that something was up, because why would the vermin at the NYT ever put an article on cannibalism on their front page?

Answer: to confuse their readers by plunging them into contrived historical dystopia and further debase the image of America's Anglo Saxon founding stock.

As this Vice Guide to Liberia video clearly demonstrates, cannibalism is still very much alive in certain parts of the world, but why again would the Grey Lady report today on an alleged   American variation thereof? And on their front page no less?

Before even this answer was readily apparent (hangover), with my usual wariness I delved into the Times' article on the so-called "cannibalism" at Jamestown (the first permanent English settlement in America), and as sure as Obama's middle name starts with the letter "H," the Times did not fail to disappoint.

From the article "Bones Testify" :

Archaeologists excavating a trash pit at the Jamestown colony site in Virginia have found the first physical evidence of cannibalism among the desperate population, corroborating written accounts left behind by witnesses. Cut marks on the skull and skeleton of a 14-year-old girl show that her flesh and brain were removed, presumably to be eaten by the starving colonists during the harsh winter of 1609.

"The first physical evidence of cannibalism," they say, as if a pre-Stone Age practice that is in fact to this day a common and uniquely african trait, was as ordinary back then as tall ships and funny hats.

In the Times' defense, the article does provide some dispassionate historical trivia :

James Horn, a historian with the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, said at a news conference on Wednesday that the young woman probably had arrived on one of the six surviving ships from a supply fleet that sailed from Plymouth, England, in early June of 1609. A week short of its destination, the fleet was scattered by a hurricane. The flagship, named the Sea Venture, which carried the expedition’s leaders, was driven onto reefs at Bermuda, an event that became the inspiration for Shakespeare’s play “The Tempest,” Dr. Horn said.

How-evah, the last few paragraphs of the Times' article are ripe with sickeningly dishonest attempts at historical revisionism:

In mid-August, six of the ships eventually reached Jamestown. But their arrival, with little food and many extra mouths, did not bring relief or comfort. The settlers’ insistent demands for food antagonized the Powhatan Indians, who at first had welcomed and provisioned them. In October or early November, with about 300 colonists crowded into the narrow confines of the James fort, the Powhatans launched a full-scale attack and siege, cutting off any hope of outside relief.

With wily and clever economy of words, the Times manages here to cast the local savages - who had in fact not the wheel, barely mastered fire or any other post-caveman endeavor,  and could more accurately be described as existing not in the Stone Age but in the "stick age" - as perfect gentle specimens of the Noble Savage Myth. Sort of like the characters you'd imagine would appear in a New York Times Cliff Notes for "Django Unchained," were it to be drafted for a future alien invader population from outer space.

Mark Twain himself would surely have appended the NYT article with a few Reminders To The Reader on the savagery of the Red Man. The New York Times, of course, in their pursuit of Universal Equalism even through the ages, has no time for Twain and his thoughts on the "Noble Red Man." Which btw start like this :

"He loves the dark-eyed daughter of the forest, the dusky maiden of faultless form and rich attire, the pride of the tribe, the all-beautiful. He talks to her in a low voice, at twilight of his deeds on the war-path and in the chase, and of the grand achievements of his ancestors; and she listens with downcast eyes, "while a richer hue mantles her dusky cheek." 

Such is the Noble Red Man in print. But out on the plains and in the mountains, not being on dress parade, not being gotten up to see company, he is under no obligation to be other than his natural self, and therefore:
He is little, and scrawny, and black, and dirty; and, judged by even the most charitable of our canons of human excellence, is thoroughly pitiful and contemptible. There is nothing in his eye or his nose that is attractive, and if there is anything in his hair that--however, that is a feature which will not bear too close examination . . . He wears no bracelets on his arms or ankles; his hunting suit is gallantly fringed, but not intentionally; when he does not wear his disgusting rabbit-skin robe, his hunting suit consists wholly of the half of a horse blanket brought over in the Pinta or the Mayflower, and frayed out and fringed by inveterate use. He is not rich enough to possess a belt; he never owned a moccasin or wore a shoe in his life; and truly he is nothing but a poor, filthy, naked scurvy vagabond, whom to exterminate were a charity to the Creator's worthier insects and reptiles which he oppresses. Still, when contact with the white man has given to the Noble Son of the Forest certain cloudy impressions of civilization, and aspirations after a nobler life, he presently appears in public with one boot on and one shoe--shirtless, and wearing ripped and patched and buttonless pants which he holds up with his left hand--his execrable rabbit-skin robe flowing from his shoulder--an old hoop-skirt on, outside of it--a necklace of battered sardine-boxes and oyster-cans reposing on his bare breast--a venerable flint-lock musket in his right hand--a weather-beaten stove-pipe hat on, canted "gallusly" to starboard, and the lid off and hanging by a thread or two; and when he thus appears, and waits patiently around a saloon till he gets a chance to strike a "swell" attitude before a looking-glass, he is a good, fair, desirable subject for extermination if ever there was one.

(ps: for further kicks and giggles, check out this funny college dissertation on Twain's essay cited above: "COLFA Research Paper Competition: Huck Finn's Indian Complexion - Student Status: M.A. Graduate Student - Department: English - Supervisor: Dr. Jeanne Reesman").

*sigh*

The second NYT Disinformation Stuka bomber unleashed today on the Memory of the West is a giddy Times hatefest directed at old white dudes in England who may or may not have fondled some random floozy forty years ago in a BBC dressing room, and who today find themselves under arrest and assaulted by a sick society that is officially forbidden not only to identify its true adversaries, but also to prevent said foes from invading and reverse-colonizing Britannia (read: the inventors of and the foot soldiers for La Guerre du Grand Remplacement), entitled "British Stars of Yesteryear Find Themselves In Sights of Sexual Offence Inquiry".

Talk about mis-channelled anger !

From that ludicrous page A09 NYT article :

The operation involves at least 69 police officers and staff members and has already cost more than $2.7 million, according to figures obtained by The Independent newspaper through a Freedom of Information Act request.

The result has been a flurry of arrests, about a dozen involving very public people. But even as women’s rights advocates and others applaud a new era of openness, in which once-cowed victims feel able to speak out, lawyers for the high-profile suspects say that in the current climate, the accusers appear to be going out of their way to opportunistically target celebrities. And, they say, many of the accusations — of gropings, lewd behavior and drunken passes, as well as sex that seemed consensual at the time — have more to do with the anything-goes culture of the era than with any criminal behavior.

**double sigh**

Tne New York Times: Criminally Complicit In Re-Directing The Sheeple's Wrath Away From The True Enemy, Since 1981.

Building 7: Unbelievable, Shocking, In-Your-Face Lies From The Paid-Off Shills At The National Institute of Standards And Measures

I've never been a big fan of conspiracy theories, and I used to dismiss 911 truthers with the argument that even if it was an inside job, that doesn't take away from the fact that people like Muhammed Atta represent a civilization that is at war with the West. (I used to use the same reasoning based on Western technical innovation and supremacy to deflect moon landing conspiracies, until I discovered obvious proof that they actually did happen).

But ever since PBS in Colorado aired the 911-sceptic film "Explosive Evidence" by the group Architects and Engineers for Truth a few months ago, I've been reading a lot more about 911 from the growing number of sources that question the official narrative.

It is becoming increasingly obvious that the same forces that silence with ridicule those who pose questions such as the obviously plausible question of the validity of the constitutional notion of dual allegiance with regard to a certain POTUS and his one foreign-born parent, are the same that make absolutely any discussion of the events of 911 outside of the Official Narrative verbotin.

Warning: delve into the 911 truther business at your own peril, because it is all-consuming, and every new discovery of flaming, imploding weirdness will freak you out.

Consider for example a few of the official answers provided by NIST to questions they could no longer ignore about the collapse of Larry Silverstein's Building 7, in their amusingly candid, "hey we have nothing to hide" FAQ list (source here) :

 8. Why did WTC 7 collapse, while no other known building in history has collapsed due to fires alone?

The collapse of WTC 7 is the first known instance of a tall building brought down primarily by uncontrolled fires. The fires in WTC 7 were similar to those that have occurred in several tall buildings where the automatic sprinklers did not function or were not present. These other buildings, including Philadelphia's One Meridian Plaza, a 38-story skyscraper that burned for 18 hours in 1991, did not collapse due to differences in the design of the structural system (see the answer to Question 9).

These guys are just unbelievable. Talk about chutzpah! And there are thirty-four more cheeky answers like this one  provided by the government information manipulators at NIST to the list of questions asked by the uncomfortably too-close-to-the-truth busy-body skeptics NIST is trying to deflect in this report.

Consider this gem:

27. Why didn't the investigators look at actual steel samples from WTC 7?
Steel samples were removed from the site before the NIST investigation began. In the immediate aftermath of Sept. 11, 2001, debris was removed rapidly from the site to aid in recovery efforts and to facilitate emergency responders' efforts to work around the site. Once it was removed from the scene, the steel from WTC 7 could not be clearly identified. Unlike the pieces of steel from WTC 1 and WTC 2, which were painted red and contained distinguishing markings, WTC 7 steel did not contain such identifying characteristics.

Of course they neglect to mention here that 80% of the steel removed from the WTC site was processed by a single scrap dealer, Hugo Neu. Here is a Forbes article about Neu and his operation. (Here, if you can stomach it, is a far more damning analysis of Hugo Neu and his role in destroying the 911 metallurgical evidence:  Christopher Bollyn: The Deception That Changed The World, Chapter XV: The Destruction of the Evidence").

Now, consider NIST's incredibly, almost laughably lame attempt to explain away evidence of thermite residue at the crime scene :

14. Is it possible that thermite or thermate contributed to the collapse of WTC 7?
NIST has looked at the application and use of thermite and has determined that it was highly unlikely that it could have been used to sever columns in WTC 7 on Sept. 11, 2001. 

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails. Thermate also contains sulfur and sometimes barium nitrate, both of which increase the compound’s thermal effect, create flame in burning, and significantly reduce the ignition temperature.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb. of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column; presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Lastly, before I become too jaded to keep calm and Le Carré on, a NIST disclaimer / blatant direct lie that is unceremoniously contradicted in the peer reviewed scientific article "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World TradeCenter Catastrophe," like they're not even trying anymore to be convincing, NIST gives us this load of make believe:

15. What about claims that the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found metallic residues that are evidence of thermite in dust and air samples, respectively, taken from the WTC area after Sept. 11, 2001? 

There has not been any conclusive evidence presented to indicate that highly reactive pyrotechnic material was present in the debris of WTC 7. The studies that have been conducted to document trace metals, organic compounds, and other materials in the dust and air from the vicinity of the WTC disaster have all suggested common sources for these items.

Alright, that's enough whacko-o conspiracy theory reporting for now.

The New York Times: Not The Only Elite Institution That Lies Through Its Rotten Teeth

Wed1MayMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

Pigford Scandal Weirdness: In An Incredible Departure From The Norm, The Social Justice Psychopaths At The New York Times Publish A Front Page Article That Actually Casts African Americans In A Negative Light

Fri26AprMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

"U.S. Opens Spigot After Farmers Claim Discrimination"

The Pigford case is one of the most glaring examples of white dhimmitude in the face of political correctness and guilt-based negrophilia out there.

Today we were shocked to see the NYT reporting on this disgusting case without the usual recriminations against the Bush administration or other such reality reversal (although however the article does manage to kinda sorta blame Pigford on GW (read the whole thing)).

From the last lines of the article  :

People familiar with that statement said it was directed in part at Thomas Burrell, a charismatic orator and the head of the Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association, based in Memphis.

Mr. Burrell has traveled the South for years, exhorting black audiences in auditoriums and church halls to file discrimination complaints with his organization’s help, in exchange for a $100 annual membership fee.

In an interview last month, Mr. Burrell said he had dedicated his life to helping black farmers after biased federal loan officers deprived him of his land and ruined his credit. He said his organization had misled no one, and had forwarded the names of all those eligible and willing to file claims.

“I have never advocated anybody file a false claim,” he said. “I have worked almost pro bono for this cause.”

On a recent Thursday at the Greater Second Baptist Church in Little Rock, several hundred African-Americans listened intently as Mr. Burrell told them they could reap $50,000 each, merely by claiming bias. He left out the fact that black men are no longer eligible, and that black women are eligible only if they suffered gender, not racial, bias.

“The Department of Agriculture admitted that it discriminated against every black person who walked into their offices,” he told the crowd. “They said we discriminated against them, but we didn’t keep a record. Hello? You don’t have to prove it.”

In fact, he boasted, he and his four siblings had all collected awards, and his sister had acquired another $50,000 on behalf of their dead father.

She cinched the claim, he said to a ripple of laughter, by asserting that her father had whispered on his deathbed, “I was discriminated against by U.S.D.A.”

“The judge has said since you all look alike, whichever one says he came into the office, that’s the one to pay — hint, hint,” he said. “There is no limit to the amount of money, and there is no limit to the amount of folks who can file.”

He closed with a rousing exhortation: “Let’s get the judge to go to work writing them checks! They have just opened the bank vault.”

Here is the Thomas "Gibs Me Dhat" Burrell  in question :

More outrageous black gibs me dhat exposed - incredibly for the NYT - in the article : 

The New York Times: Exposing Negro Dysfunction Only When They Have To, Since 1964

Flash From the Past, 1946: "Brotherhood of Man" - Incredibly Crude Early Anti-Racist Propaganda

h/t: Kevin MacDonald

Jockeying For A Hard-Earned Third Place In CH's Photo Of The Century Shoot-Out, This Pic Published Today On Page A11 Of The NYT's National Edition Is Going To Blow Your Mind

Tu23AprMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

The NYT published an article in today's national edition entitled :

"A Presidential Pat For Young Scientists"

From the article :





You read that right: as endorsed by the wishful thinking reality-reversers at the New York Times, the BO administration backed by you know who are poised to spend a fifth of a billion dollars in the very near future in an attempt to erase the achievement gap, specifically and insidiously by steering females and minorities into the STEM studies.

This money on top of the trillions that have already been spent through the certifiably insane NCLB plot that requires all humans to be equally intelligent, even though about that Nobel Prize winner James Watson famously sez (God love'im)  - "um, not really."

Problem is, that the only way to effectively comfort the afflicted as per the Times' official social justice role, is to afflict the comfortable down to the ground.

Consider the photo below that accompanies the NYT's article:

I humbly submit that this photo could be added to the great Heartiste's own selection of photos, for his official early-21st century "Photo Of The Century Shoot Out".

Here are those two CH photos :

Exhibit A: The Boston Bombers' carjacked Mercedes with the "Coexist" bumper sticker :

Exhibit B: The "Honey I don't think that dock can hold all of us" wedding party :

With all due respect to the great Chateau Heartiste, I humbly submit photo number 3, showing the Fraudulent One himself in the company of an obese prognathic missing link high school student at a science fair on the White House grounds, alongside a skinny white girl hanging her head in shame for her evil white privilege.

Obese Kiona and Obama hisself appear to be staring down the poor slender white girl, as if to say: "STEM is racist! Math is racist! And it's all your ancestors' fault!", as the poor skinny white girl bows down in officially sanctioned shame. 

The New York Times: Certifiably Insane Since 1956.   

Incredibly Suspicious Anti-Majority (heh) Propaganda From The Verminous Psychopaths At The NYT

It's like the magical 6m number that appears over and over again in the strangest of places,  and the equally magical "11 million" illegal alien figure*, which even though entire regions throughout the United States have become dominated in certain industries - such as residential roofing and gardening services - by illegal mono-lingual Spanish-speaking Mexicans and their numbers grow every year, these fanciful figures have not evolved in the sick and criminal pages of Amerika's newspaper of record in over ten years. Check out, below, what a quick Times search reveals about the famous "11 million" figure.

Meanwhile, the verminous reality contortionists at Amerika's evil newspaper of record are sneering at the hated Koch billionaire brothers and their alleged strategy to change the world - in a manner creepily similar to the one the that the Times and her protagonists themselves have been using for decades, in an article entitled:

"Conservative Koch Brothers Turning Focus To Newspapers"

From the article :

Gee, evil conservatives getting together in a secret location to talk about a long term plan to influence public policy.

Where have I heard of a plan like that before?

.../...

Meanwhile, a quick Times search reveals how long the Grey Lady has been peddling the "11 million" lie :

The New York Times: Stinking, Verminous, Evil Lying Scum, Since 1896. 

Never Have Been A Big Fan Of Conspiracy Theories, But... Consider This :

Mon22AprMMXIII-Clk2Enrlrg

Seriously, not sure what to think about this :

"The Boston Unicorn"

The New York Times: Promoting Hatred For The Truth Since Jason Blair

Understanding Boston: "Anyone sane would have understood that allowing Chechins named after Tamerlame, a murderous crippled Asiatic sheep-thief piling heads in heaps during the 15th Century Asia, was a stupid idea"

20AprilMMXIII-HBD Uncle A,
 You Tried To Warn Us

Search, Cotters. Search.

Inform thyneselves.

And don't expect Amerika's newspaper of record to do it for you or  ever, ever mention that Boston muslim brothers bomber #1 was named after a Turkic warlord.



Consider this mainstream offal from the NYT:



"Boy at Home in U.S., Swayed By One Who Wasn't"




From the article :

Note the nazi link-up.


More from the article : an embedded NYT video that features this oppressed Bostonite heaping praise on his murdering dope-smoking Chechen buddy   :

This whole Boston muslim bombers thing has generated some of the most intense and insightful commentary I have ever read on the internet.

Ever.

Case in point: h/T to : Heartiste :

"One Blessing Of Outbreeding"

The New York Times: They Hate The Internet Because It Exposes Their Crimes, Since 1889.

"Derka Derka!" - The Second Urine-Colored Islamic Terrorist Bomber From Chechnya Has Been Captured And Caged In Massachusetts - The Beedie-Eyed Weasels At Amerika's Newspaper Of Record Are None Too Happy

Fri19AprMMXIII-Clk2ENrlg

Sick, but true: they were hoping and praying that the perps would turn out to be Timothy McVeigh Jr.-types.

Sorry Salon; Sorry Tim Wse:

Cuz it turns out the Boston bomber was a practitioner of the religion of peace, just as the data told us it would most likely be.

Which in the sense that mathematics and empiric deduction can be used to predict future outcomes, this is practically proof that there is a God after all.

And no, by "God" we do not mean Muhammed the pedophile, Muhammed the dirty-beard creep who wedded his bride Aisha, one of many, when she was six years old.

Which BTW: just three years after his "wedding" with Aisha,  Islam's model man, the "perfect man" according to the Koran and one to be an inspiration and role model to billions of his kinfolk worldwide, the disgusting and vile fifty-year old Muhammed consummated the marriage with his child wife.

This type of shocking info is easy to verify and cross-reference if you have an internet connectino and you are not in China, but you will never, ever see such non-PC propositions in the decrepit pages of the NYT.

Most Muslims worldwide exist today only and uniquely as a direct result of Western munificence and technology. They are like bacteria in a petri dish in an experiment gone terribly wrong; the white scientist in his long white lab coat runs for his life as his clones multiply like a foul-smelling algeae bloom.

The West has created the pre-conditions for its own Downfall.

As a public-policy influencer, the New York Times plays a uniquely pivotal role in the decline of the West.

h/T Hunter Wallace :

Two Interesting Examples Of How The Verminous Zion-Facilitating Reality Contortionists At The New York Times Report On The Devolutionary Islamic Terrorists In Our Midst

It's practically like calling a cockroach an oppressed Blattaria facing decades of evil European DDT-style insecticide genocide.

Exhibit A :

"Bombings End Decade of Strikingly Few Successful Terrorism Attacks in U.S."

From the article : 

Exhibit B : 

"Boston Bombs Were Loaded To Maim"

The New York Times: Praying That The Boston Bombers Are White Guys, Since 1987

Thanks A Lot, Bill Clinton

We've finally found the original video from the 1998 Portland State commencement speech where (at the 14th minute, below), the crowd cheers when Clinton proclaims: "In 50 years there will be no majority race in America" :

Well Billy, after Boston we hope that you are happy with what your treachery has wrought.

The Evil Reality-Reversers At The New York Times Pick The Wrong Day To Publish A Pro-Terrorist Sympathy Puff Piece

Published yesterday April 15th,  just a few hours before the eruption of jihadist violence in Boston:

"Gitmo Is Killing Me" (by accused jihadist Yemenite terrorist Samir Naji al Hasan Moqbel, currently caged in Guantamano Bay, Cuba).

Additionally, right there on today's front page, the large above-the-fold photograph gives us a solid hint into one of the causes behind the Boston bombings: namely, the uniquely caucasioid malady of minority worship, with a particularly strong strain of the social justice bug enhanced with pathological levels of afrophilia, as illustrated almost eerily in the only black in the all-white crowd below, the imaginary one dreamed up by Addidas.

From "Gitmo Is Killing Me":

"I’ve been on a hunger strike since Feb. 10 and have lost well over 30 pounds. I will not eat until they restore my dignity.

I’ve been detained at Guantánamo for 11 years and three months. I have never been charged with any crime. I have never received a trial.

I could have been home years ago — no one seriously thinks I am a threat — but still I am here. Years ago the military said I was a “guard” for Osama bin Laden, but this was nonsense, like something out of the American movies I used to watch. They don’t even seem to believe it anymore. But they don’t seem to care how long I sit here, either.

When I was at home in Yemen, in 2000, a childhood friend told me that in Afghanistan I could do better than the $50 a month I earned in a factory, and support my family. I’d never really traveled, and knew nothing about Afghanistan, but I gave it a try.

I was wrong to trust him. There was no work. I wanted to leave, but had no money to fly home. After the American invasion in 2001, I fled to Pakistan like everyone else. The Pakistanis arrested me when I asked to see someone from the Yemeni Embassy. I was then sent to Kandahar, and put on the first plane to Gitmo.

Last month, on March 15, I was sick in the prison hospital and refused to be fed. A team from the E.R.F. (Extreme Reaction Force), a squad of eight military police officers in riot gear, burst in. They tied my hands and feet to the bed. They forcibly inserted an IV into my hand. I spent 26 hours in this state, tied to the bed. During this time I was not permitted to go to the toilet. They inserted a catheter, which was painful, degrading and unnecessary. I was not even permitted to pray."

Aw boo-fucking hoo, you nasty, piss-colored Yemenite with a stupid name.

The New York Times: Right Now These Dimmie Scum Are Praying The Boston Bomber Is A White Guy, Since 2013

        

Try To Visualize The New York Times Editorial Meeting Where This Story Was Greenlighted For Publication In The March 31st NYT Book Review:

A review of yet another hagiography of Snivel Rights "hero" Rosa Parks, by the laughable-if-it-weren't-so-darn-sad author of the sneering "History Of White People,"  Nell Irvin Painter:

"'The Rebellious Life Of Rosa Parks,' by Jeanne Theoharris, reviewed by Nell Irvin Painter"

From the review:

"Beautiful" Rosa Parks? In the NYT book review? 

She looks like a lot of things but "beautiful" is not the first adjective that leaps to mind. 

The New York Times: They Never Got The Memo on OBD*, Since 1947. 

*The One Banana Difference

Bizarro World Status Whoring: The NYT Publishes A Fuzzy Puff Piece On Australia's "Chopper," The Knife Murderer Whose Life Story Was Made Into A Film That Capitulated Fellow Ozzie Eric Bana Into Stardom (In The 2009 Adam Sandler Flick "Funny People")

Thu12AprMMXIII -Clk2Enlrg

"Australia’s Brand Name for Ferocity, Softened by Time"

What oh what (tf) ever happened to the Times' moral compass?

Did they ever even have one?

From the article :

 But before any real conversation could get started, the man better known by the nom de guerre Chopper wanted to make something perfectly clear: the number of murders attributed to him — roughly 19 at this point — is grossly exaggerated.

“Look, honestly, I haven’t killed that many people,” he said matter-of-factly before finally settling on a number that he said felt more accurate: “probably about four or seven, depending on how you look at it.”

In his 58 years, Mr. Read has been many things to many people: beloved son, husband and father; perhaps the most feared criminal in Melbourne’s notorious criminal history; an exuberant painter; the king of Australia’s most dangerous prison; and one of the country’s best-selling contemporary authors, including of children’s books.        

Cops In Schools; No Mention Of The Obvious

Fre12AprMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

"With Police in Schools, More Children in Court"

France, As In: "Le Changement De Peuple": The Verminous, Agenda-Driven Weasels At Amerika's Newspaper of Record Rub Their Grubby Hands Together In A Victory Lap Puff-Piece That Basically Says: "We Came, We Destroyed, We Left"... Behind Entire Battlefields Of Confused, Broken Societies

"Foreign Clergy Move To France To Aid Priests"

From the article : 

Translation: The sick, sickly civilization-wreckers at the NYT are fine with religion, as long as said religion is not being practiced by white Euros, in which case the whole weight of the so-called Catholic Church abuse scandal, and other relative misdeeds attributable to the one institution that has done more good by building and running hospitals schools and other institutions of human betterment, must be driven home 24/7. 

The hypocrisy of the elitist do-gooders at the NYT knows no bounds when it comes to discussion of the Catholic Church. 

Paul Du Chaillu: The First European To Exhibit African Gorillas

Sun7AprMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

From today Sunday's New York Times Book Review: 

"Planet of the Ape: Between Man And Beast, by Monte Reel"

And on the cover no less ! 

We talked about this De Chaillu dude not too long ago, because his role in familiarizing Europeans with the higher primates that whites did not even know existed until the mid-1800s, contributes a lot to understanding the mindset of Euros in the midst of the Darwinian Revolution. 

From the perspective of this blog and other Southern nationalist sites such as Hunter Wallace's OD, de Chaillu's contribution to Western justification for slavery - even if it came relatively late in the game (de Chaillu lived from 1831 to 1903) - cannot be overstated. 

Naturally the New York Times makes the very first chronicler of african mountain gorillas out to  be nothing more than a circus performer and a bumbling opportunist, in their review of this book on De Chaillu written by Monte Reel of the Washington Post. 

The fact is that Euros were as confused back then as they are today when it comes to grasping the reality of their own hierarchical exceptionalism. 

To truly understand De Chaillu's gorilla exhibits in the context of slavery in the New World, one must read not "Of Inhuman Bondage" by America's pre-eminent "specialist" on slavery, David Brion Davis, but rather Hunter Wallace of Occidental Dissent and his review of the DBD mega-tome. 

From the Times' Book Review: 

Du Chaillu was a young explorer of part-French extraction, son of a trader, poorly educated but a good marksman, who emerged from Gabon in 1859, after a four-year hunting expedition, with 20 preserved skins of a kind of massive ape, known to the local people as njena. The animal soon took its familiar name, gorilla, by loose borrowing from the ancient Greek account of a voyage by Hanno the Navigator, who claimed to have seen some big and hairy people along the African coast and called them Gorillae, though almost certainly they weren’t actual gorillas. Science now recognizes two species, the eastern gorilla (of which the famously endangered mountain gorillas are a subspecies) and the western, which includes those individuals that fell to Du Chaillu’s gun. But such modern taxonomic dicing is far removed, in time and spirit, from the tale of scientific buccaneering and creationist discomfiture that Reel, a former correspondent for The Washington Post, tells in this intriguing book.

Un-shining A Spotlight On Juvenile Minority Criminality : The New York Times Descends To New Depths Of Journalistic Status-Whoring Trickery And Deceitfulness In A Front Page Propaganda Puff Piece About A 90-Year Old Black Granny Carjacked In Georgia By "Un-Thinking" Youth Assailants Whom The Times Insidiously Fails To Describe

Sat6AprMMXIII-Clk2Enlrg

The other day my local coffee shop was sold-out of NYTs, so I picked up a copy of the Wall Street Journal instead.

What struck me most while reading the WS Journal instead of my usual daily masochistic dose of NYT fun-house diversity enforcement, was the Journal's almost total lack of social justice-style reporting, the tiresome SWPL kind of minority-uplift drivel that appears in practically every single one of the Times' published articles.

Even though both of these newspaper powerhouses are driven by a common post-modernist liberal agenda, the Grey Lady is clearly the more guilty offender when it comes to "comforting the afflicted, and afflicting the comfortable," at the expense of a very specific demographic.  And we already knew that the liberals' own ideological untouchables are women and minorities. Period.

Exhibit A presented to support this assertion is a front page "human interest" story published on Saturday, April 6th MMXIII, and entitled
"Payment For Act Of Kindness: Two Days In Car Trunk At 89".

It is the story of a very old black woman - one Margaret E. Smith from Lincoln, Delaware of all places - who not long ago was carjacked by a couple of "youths" who forced her to spend two days in the trunk of her Buick LeSabre.

An instance of extreme juvenile criminality, to be sure. But worthy of a front-page appearance in the most expensive publishing real estate on Planet Earth? Even though we have other youths such as De'Marquise Elkins - who murdered an infant with a guinshot to the face in shooting infants in the face who barely get mentioned in the illustrious pages of the NYT?

We don't think so.

The Times' article on baby slayer De'Marquise gets barely a single paragraph, while their sensationalist hagiographic front-pager painting a heroic picture of l'il Miss. Margaret goes on for a full five pages.

From the Times' front page article on Smith :

LINCOLN, Del. A steel-haired woman, 89 years old and an inch short of five feet, sat on a pillow in the driver’s seat of her Buick LeSabre, just thinking. Parked outside a convenience store on one of the last days of winter, she was considering a pre-Easter treat for herself: an ice cream cone. Butter pecan.

Two girls, 15 and 14, appeared at the window, calling her “Miss” and offering to pay for a ride to the other side of town. Her inclination was to say no, but her strong belief in offering kindness to strangers won out. She said yes, of course, and no need to pay her.

Uncertainty soon joined the ride, as her passengers directed her to one house, then to another, and another. Then, according to the police, they snatched her keys, causing a tussle between two girls and a small woman three times their combined ages.

Youth won out. They locked her in the trunk.      

The most amazing part of this story is not the depraved nature of the violence itself, but rather the fact that there is a virtual 99.99% statistical certainty that this poor little old lady's attackers were individuals who resembled her genetically, quite a lot.

Everybody knows chances are - and by a long shot - that Driving Miss Margaret's carjackers were:
 
Not Asian.

Not Hispanic.

Not Native American.

Not Jewish.

Not Russian Immigrants.

And certainly not white.

Backed by simple, easy-to-verify statistics, the chances are extremely high that Miss Margaret's attackers were African Americans just like her.

And yet the sickly individuals at Amerika's newspaper of record cannot even bring themselves to suggesting this obvious reality.

*sigh*

I'm thinking now that the New York Times, by not even hat-tipping to this obvious possibility, is perhaps the biggest story of them all, in this story.

.../...

Here's where it gets downright comical: the Times published Miss Margaret's sweet-looking portrait right there on the front page. On page 16 inside where the story reprised, however, the verminous reality contortionists at the Times published three photos of evil-looking whites in orange jump suits to counter-balance the other photo of Miss Margaret, who is pictured above them on page 16, inside her humble abode in Delaware, with pictures of Martin Luther King and Jesus Christ adorning the walls. {Reminder: in the sickly hive mind of the New York Times, adherence to religious beliefs is always sneered at and ridiculed when adherents are not minority and female; the disgusting maggots at Amerika's newspaper of record will always and most hypocritically spit on the Catholic Church and Christianity in general, unless those living religiously are, say, illegal immigrant famblies from Mexico, for example, in which case their attendance of Sunday services makes them respectable and responsible "church-going" believers}.  

Miss Margaret: 90 Years-Old, Carjacked By Youth
Who Look Like Her, Pictured Saintly 

The New York Times is a disgusting elitist NWO institution of criminal disinformation,

Here's the Times puff piece involving criminals from a wholly different crime, published on the same page as the saintly Miss Margaret, to further confuse the gullible reader :


"Less Culpable, But With Longer Sentences"

The mugs below were published directly below the saintly picture of church-going carjack victim Margaret E. Smith, above, to subliminally suggest that it was evil whites and not feral negro youth who attacked her, carjacked her, and threw her in a trunk.

The New York Times: Bring It On, Bitches ! 

The Annoying Nanny-State Google "Word Verification" Feature Is Off

H/t to commenter David.

While The New York Times Talks About A Bronx Zoo Chimp Named Patty Cake Today In A Front Page Obituary - BTW Writing An Obit For A Zoo Animal Is Strange Enough In Itself - We Here At COTT Bring You Some Real Wildlife Footage From Our Own Neck Of The Woods, Here In The Deep South, At New Orleans' Parish Prison

"A Child Star With A Knack For Publicity," by Times communist N.R. Kleinfield.

Meanwhile, from the downsized Times Picayune in New Orleans, we get this shocking tale of the breakdown of civilization in the Orleans Parish Prison :