Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

The Subversive Sneakiness and Cynical Sneering of the New York Times Knows No Bounds

Seriously, this shit should be illegal.

Take a look at the photo below, published in accompaniment of the article entitled "Frankly, My Dear, The Windies Do Live For This," on page A14 in today's National section.

Do I need to even ask what is wrong with this picture?





Comments to follow, depending on which comments we get.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

WTF is THAT !!!

Elliot said...

Here's MY comment: Obviously to the freaks at the Jew York Times, anything that even indirectly speaks positively about Gone WIth The Wind is a thing of Southern bigotry, and by extension anti-Negro worship.

Example: I remember not too long ago the NYT went on and on and on and on about the fate black maid who played the fat black maid in GWTW - they made this lady look like she was Rosa Parks with an Academy Award.

WHat the blogger here is trying to say: with this picture, it is so fucking obvious: the Times chooses to talk about GWTW, and about the GWTW fan clubs around the country, by publishing a disgusting picture of what looks like a transvestite -

JESUS CHRIST ! They think that they are so subtle, but the fact is that their perfidy shines shines shines though.

It is so obvious to se what they are doing here : there are probably tens of thousands of DIE HARD GWTW fans, including lots of gorgeous Southern Belles who look as good as if not better than Vivian Leigh.

INSTEAD, the FUCKtoids at the Times choose to publish a photo of a giant thing (sheman?) (DID YOU GET A LOOK AT THEM ARMS?), thereby disparaging all things GWTW, by extension all things SOUthern, by extension all things WHITE.

Jesus Christ - they think they are so clever at the NYT.

BTW Cott: thanks for the post on how to beat the NYT payway. These fucking idiots are so stupid, not just on what they report on (or fail to report on), but also something so simple as a super-simple paywal.

Anonymous said...

Tjose sneaky, nasty mother fuckers at the NYT : who do they think they're kidding.

You have to look close and hard at the caption to realize that this giant thing is not, in fact, a man.

It is a woman - according to the psychopaths at the New York Times anyway - but just barely !!

<...>

Anonymous said...

I too thought it strange that the NYT would publish a photo of what clearly looks like a big-boned man in drag.

Of course you would never, EVER see the New York Times publish a photo of a drop-dead gorgeous, Vivian-Leigh style southern woman in a Snivel War-era dress.

Of course they wold never do that: it would be to speak positively of the South in the Snivel War. ./