Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Friday, September 2, 2011

The New York Times Gets Horny in Haiti

"Haitian Divers Hope To Aid Ailing Reef"

Consider the unbelievably misleading wording of the title of the article above.

When I first saw this today in the pages of Amerika's newspaper of record, my first thought was: "Okay, the New York Times has managed to track down the only person in all of Haiti who has ever gone scuba diving, and write a story about that person."

The reality is even more embarrassing than that.

You can be pretty sure when you read anything, and I mean anything about Haiti written by the New York Times in the last fifty years, the end result is going to be some paternalistic puff-piece pushing the same old tired narrative of an oppressed people valiantly standing up to terrible adversity. The pretty much standardized excuse for Haitian failure is Number One the legacy of slavery (you guessed it!), followed by Number Two bad government (corruption - the eunuchs at the NYT LOVE to blame African failure and  bad government on corruption, as if it were some kind of water-borne ailment), followed by - as enunciated in the laughable lines of the columns of that most pathetic of all NYT died-in-the-wool egalitarianists, Nicholas Kristof (who is married to an Asian woman) - again you guessed it!, evil whitey, i.e. the Evil West, in the form of the debt obligations the West is holding over the head of paw paw little ole' Haiti.

Please don't get me wrong: as much as anybody, I gain no pleasure by witnessing the misery of others. Haiti is a godforsaken shithole whose biggest curse, regrettably, is the people who inhabit its parched plateaux. There were nine and a half million of them when the earthquake knocked down their cinterblock shanties; today their population seems to have actually benefitted from all the foreign tear-jerking and kowtowing - to the point where it has exceeded over twelve million*! (*CIA World Factbook). Talk about getting down to bidness in the face of adversity !

The problem, people, is that disingenuous institutions who tow the party line like the New York Times - who make no mistake wield enormous power when it comes to determining public policy on these matters - actually perpetuate the stupidity by hoodwinking people worldwide into believing some fairytale version of world history that is so obviously out of synch with reality.

Nothing, and I mean NOTHING could be more destructive and counter-productive when it comes to a place like Haiti, than maintaining the myth that all people have equal ability.

It comes down to competitive compassion, a form of a sickness known as competitive altruism (make a note), that is a disease of the mind that is unique to and endemic of Westerners. The Chinese thankfully for them are not infected; nor are their neighbours the Indians to the east, etc and so on.

Only Westerners are infected with this sick, debilitating disease, which prevents them from seeing the reality of human achievement as based on group performance.

.../...

Anyway, back to today's Haitian uplift piece in Amerika's newspaper of record, by Times eunuch and communist Brent McDonald: this is an article that takes the whole Haitian noble savage narrative to an incredibly condescending new level of make-believe. Amazing, it is, that the New York Times thinks they can get away with such nonsense in this day and age of the internet.

Watch the video below (sorry, I couldn't embed it; but you can watch it here). What you'll see is the work of a skinny little neutered Times reporter, um, Mr. McDonald, who no doubt took a BIG fancy to the relatively foxy Haitian featured foremost in his article, a one Jessika Laloi (whom the NYT helpfully informs us was a budding medical student before the quake hit).

Here's a screen shot of the vid : 



Yeah, I know I know. I was thinking the same thing: "Wow, the New York Times is featuring Haitian titties now, what progress." 

McDonald knew that his editors on 42nd were going to demand that he submit a glowing, uplifting piece on Haiti, coming up as we are on 2 years after the quake. He knew that he needed to file an article  brimming with positive images of Haiti (chore!), even if it meant distorting the truth in painful ways.

When the local Haitian New York Times employees on the island set up McDonald with this relatively foxy (for a Haitian) 21 year-old, I guarantee you that ole' Brent felt the kind of stirring in his loins that he hadn't felt since his first experiments with the lufa in the shower.

I mean, Gaaawd, look at the size of the titties on this Haitian lovely : (Kind of interesting to see the New York Times getting all National Geographic with the locals in this piece - I mean, Jaysus! Isn't that nudity illegal? Or is the New York Times suggesting that these people (like the Pygmies) are so pure and noble and wholesome, that it is okay to show them in the buff, especially when they have nice, round, perky litlte titties that make the Brent McDonald eunuchs of the New York Times all atwitter with desire?).

Hey, I'm not the one who posted a fantasy story about imaginary Haitian medical students donning scuba gear to save the coral reefs that ring the island of Hispanolia, which were themselves destroyed by the lustful Haitian anglers, whose motto generally is: "Fish It, Fuck It, Break It, Steal It, and Blame Whitey."   Hey! The New York Times went there first, I'm merely an observer.

Forgive me I'm getting a little off topic here - it must be those Bantu titties. Gaawd! (How can the NYT get away with this?) (I must say though : for once the Times prints something of entertainment value, even if unwittingly).

But nevertheless, how can the Times get away it this?

Answer: send a young Princeton grad to Haiti with a Blackberry, an expense account and a mission to depict all that sad nation's woes in a light totally and completely removed from reality, encounter a chesty Bantu in the process, and what you have is DWL New York Times GOLD, on an epic scale.

I am sooo distracted by those Haitian loloes, that I practically forgot the whole point of this post!

Oh well! If they allowed the New York Times to take the spotlight off the reality of that half-island's epic FAIL for a moment in print today, I suppose we here at COTT should be afforded the same distraction.

If only for a moment !

The New York Times: Allowing Their Young Reporters To Travel To Africa And Haiti and Get All Horny N'Sheet Since 1981 !

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

GOODness! I looked at that vid (thanks for the link) and yes yes YES it does look like the buxom Haitian lady is topless in the video !

Anonymous said...

If you want to read NYT articles about Haiti that are not slanted and imbued with NWO uplift / egalitarianism, you have to go back to the 1930s.

Here's a good example mates :

Just do a google search along the lines of :

"Haiti, New York Times articles, 1930s".

Back then, the Times was a great newspaper, the young lads in bowties knew to call a spade a spade, without any hint of superiority or racism mind you. It's just that, back then, when there was no nonstop 24/7 media propaganda, and despite the absence of the interent and its non-stop information flow, people know that the poor niggers of Haiti were a different species, half monkey half man, and that they were as deserving of fear as they were of pity.

Hey, I'm only sayin'! My neighbours' ancestors were actually wealthy French aristocrats who were by and large murdered by the niggers on Haiti when the Revolution happened. The atrocities were bad. My friend's great great great grandfather got spirited out of Haiti by a loyal black servant as an infant, made his way to NEw ORleans, the rest is history.

Haiti is one of the most fucked up places on the planet. In a sane world, the cause would be obvious: niggers. They need help, but they NOT the kind of help the liberal white progressive world gives them.

WHat HAiti needs is to STOP breeding, STOP destroying the fucking place, ... I'm going to go out on a limb here: what Haiti needs is for ALL the niggers there to STOP EVER BREEDING. That would be a start.

Of course it's hopeless folks, you know that. NIggers breed because like rodents it's a life-force that is hard-wired into them.

I have lived in Africa, what is interesting that in the Dark Continent the negroes have a clear understanding of who is in charge - in most cases (say Senegal) it is the lighter skinned Lebanese and Malaysians, who own all the buisinesses and provide the jobs.

I will never forget, when I was in Dakar Senegal, the black-as-coal negros would be lined up FOUR BLOCKS LONG to get to the window of the French embassy to get visas to go and breed in the land of their former colionial master.

Flash forward a decade: fully 51% of ALL BABIES biorn in Paris now are born to African mothers.

Let me repeat that: IN PARIS, A FULL 51% OF ALL NEWBORNS ARE TO AFRICAN MOTHERS.

Need I say it again?

Spread the word. You may or may not realize how dire this situ is.

Anonymous said...

"Flash forward a decade: fully 51% of ALL BABIES born in Paris now are born to African mothers."

In the US now, white babies being born are now the minority.
You can bet that the muds being born are getting welfare and medical care all mostly paid for my whites. Whites are cooking their own goose.

The future of the US is written on the faces of these muds being born in the US.

AnalogMan said...

I have lived all my life in South Africa. In the old days, we had a Publications Control Board (censor) that banned or censored all "undesirable" books, movies etc. Anything that depicted nudity was cut mercilessly. Even the posters advertising movies would have any hint of cleavage painted over in black.

And yet, in the tribal areas the Babuntu women would walk around in nothing but a string of beads or a scrap of leather. American tourists used to love getting their pictures taken with the authentic natives.

The explanation for this apparent paradox is simple. It wasn't nudity per se that was undesirable. It was lust. Naked black women weren't a problem; who could possibly find them sexy?

That's still a good question. Who, and how?

Im There said...

Who is Arthur ? I wanna know who wrote this