|Mon 15 July MMXIII-Clk2Enlrg|
Why were Trayvon Martin's criminal proclivities not discussed for even one second during the trial?
Why was it not mentioned as it should have been over and over that the only reason he was in GW's (Zimmerman's) neighborhood watch area in the first place, was that he had been suspended from skoo for criminal behaviour?
Answer: the debate that is going on nationwide over the Trayvon affair is a "dialogue de sourds" - it's like two deaf people talking about a rainstorm, while both are blindfolded and neither realizes that they are are actually being urinated upon.
To truly understand the Trayvon-O-mania affair, everyone should be familiar with and understand the life works of Paul du Chaillu, Nehemia Adams, Dr. Samuel Morton, the lying and verminous Stephen Jay Gould, Charles Darwin, and Socrates.
Do not look to the New York Times for wisdom or a coherent explanation of current events: the NYT is on a berserk and militant mission to undo Americana, in a sickly perversion of their creed: "To comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable."
The New York Time is an evil institution that gets sicker by the day.