Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Friday, December 27, 2013

Last Friday of MMXIII

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

The New York Times Responds To TWA Flight 800 Truther Movie

Wed X-Mas Day MMXIII
So 17 years after the fact, the vermin at Amerika's newspaper of record essentially admit the plausibility of a friendly fire missile strike on TWA flight 800.

The more you learn about TWA 800 the more obvious it will become that it was, in fact, an accident.

The biggest part of the story though is of course the cover up, and what its gradual unravelling will mean for the validation of greater truther movements, such as Bldg 7 and Obama's ineligibility under the dual allegiance clause.

I can tell you this is what probably happened: as there were verifiable live-fire naval manouvers in the area on July 17th 1996, a surface to air missile was launched - perhaps in an exercise designed to intercept  another, second missile - and as the navy personnel who'd launched it realized that they had lost control of their missile(s), they hit the self-destruct button. But the missile was too close to TWA 800 when it exploded, and the shock wave "unzipped" the jumbo jet. That's when the navy guys on the ships below said "oops" then gunned their vessels away from the crime scene at 30 knots, which is damn fast.

.../...

Here's a thought: if the above theory is true, then there are many former and active Navy personnel who have some very powerful incentives to keep quiet.

What if a very wealthy reader in the alt-rightosphere could finance a very large reward - say 1m$ or more - for information to disprove the official, ridiculous "spark in the center wing tank" theory?

Certainly such a man must exist, and such a plan could be pulled off.

Crazier things have happened.

.../...


TELEVISION REVIEW (published July 13, 2013)

Plenty of people were unconvinced by the official explanation for the explosion of TWA Flight 800 off Long Island 17 years ago, which killed 230 people. And not all of the skeptics have been willing to let go of their unease as time has gone by.

Follow @nytimesarts for arts and entertainment news.

" On Epix on Wednesday, the anniversary of the crash, some of the more credible doubters take their best shot at proving that a missile or missiles brought down the plane. This isn’t crackpot conspiracy theory stuff; the documentary is as serious and somber as its title, “TWA Flight 800.”The film is certainly successful at rekindling any misgivings you might have had about the original government finding, which attributed the explosion to fuel tank vapors. It presents witnesses who are still adamant that they saw a flare or missile ascending toward the plane just before it blew up. And it relies heavily on several people who were directly involved in the long investigation, who talk about evidence that they say was tampered with, and other odd goings-on.
Kristina Borjesson wrote and directed the film, but its main catalyst was Tom Stalcup, a physicist who has been conducting his own investigation of the crash since shortly after it happened. Without Dr. Stalcup’s level of expertise, it’s hard to know which information and accusations here are new, and which are merely revisiting unresolved concerns. But the accumulation is certainly formidable.
The film ends with a lengthy list of officials who declined to be interviewed, which leaves it one-sided, and it doesn’t go beyond merely asking that the crash get another look: the intent is not to explore who might have fired any missiles that were fired.
These days, though, the real question is, who would have the credibility to conduct the reopened investigation that Dr. Stalcup and others seen here want? The agencies involved in the original one come off poorly in this film, and it’s hard to imagine any entity that would command the authority that could put the Flight 800 case to rest." 


The New York Times: Shameless, Verminous, Lying, Perfidious, Hateful... And All That Before Eleven A.M., All Day Every Day 

Friday, December 20, 2013

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Flash From The Future: New York Times' Bottled-Water Girl, "Dasani," Makes Headlines From The Future In The Big Easy :

Tuesday 17 December 2013
The vermin at Amerikas's newspaper of record told us that she with her "luminous eyes", would become a Supreme Court Justice one day.

An asteroid from the future with a newspaper attached, however, just crashed into our office. And this is the story that we saw on the front page :


(Note: the New Orleans home that future-Dasani lives in with her offspring, located (per the article) in the 2300 block of Martin Luther King Boulevard, is 100% newly-built post-Katrina federal section-8 housing, constructed to the highest standards). 

(A simple Google Street View search reveals that, this ain't no homeless shelter housing ) : 


Future Dasani's Pubilc Housing : Looks Pretty Comfy To Me
And yes, the New Orleans "Grandma" in question is in fact a thirty-eight year old, with a two-year old grandson. 

And yes, that means that this future-Dasani was just thirty-six when her first (?) grandson was born. A grandson at 36! While living in public housing. 

The New York Times: Not Just Oblivious To, But Actively Instrumental In, The Incremental Breakdown Of Western Civilization Wherever It Raises Its Ugly Head, Since 1945. 




Monday, December 16, 2013

Saturday, December 14, 2013

A Violent ICBM* Primate You Won't Be Reading About In The Sanctimonious Pages Of The New York Times...

Saturday December 15th 2013
...Where the type of stop-and-frisk policy used with considerable success in NYC to clamp down on such violent antics as those featured below have been under attack by the Times for years now.

(They are too busy creaming their Armani pants suits with breathless remembrances of the (ex-) terrorist they sickeningly refer to as "Madiba").

Even Paul Simon (or should we say: "of course Paul Simon") was allowed to pen yet another sanctimonious Mandela-worship puff piece in today's "Arts" section :

"Remembering Days Of Miracle And Wonder"

But we digress.

Check out the individual in the Bait Car video below. This person who like a wild invasive species is actually defined by the negative impact he has on society (multiple felony convictions, propensity to violence, multiple lengthy prison terms), is a member of the exact same protected class to which belongs "Supreme," the practically fictional step-father figure featured in the NYT's five-part, 29,000-word "Dasani the angelic bottled water girl and her seven siblings" series, aka "Invisible Child," by Times communist Andrea Elliot. (Again: Is it possible that the competitive compassion athletes at the NYT were really oblivious to the irony of the phoniness that calling their series "Invisible Child" represents, when everyone is aware of the South Park-style phoniness that was exposed after that other DWL uplift organization - Jason Russel's "Invisible Children" - put the "Kony 2012" video online to viral ridicule?)

There truly is no telling with the New York Times.



The New York Times: Since 1915, Powered By ADL, NAACP, SPLC, and SWPL, Since The Day Pinky Sulzberger's Ancestors Picked It Up For Peanuts in 1896.

*ICBM = "Inner City Black Male"

Monday, December 9, 2013

The Competitive Compassion Morality Athletes At The New York Times Publish A Gargantuan, Above-The-Fold Front-Page Feature Piece On An Inner City Ghetto Fambly Of Ten (!) That Leaves The Innocent Reader Wondering How The Times Could Possibly Glorify Such Abject Social Dysfunction

Monday 9 December MMXIII
"Girl In The Shadows: Dasani's Homeless Life", by Times' communist Andrea Elliot (email her!), is such a monstrosity of disingenuous white liberals attempting to uplift ghetto blacks, that it simply cannot pass without scrutiny from COTT or elsewhere.

The front page photo that announced this article was one of the biggest front page photos I have ever seen in the New York Times.

Published as it was on the heels of Saint Mandela's death, and a mere one day after the NYT did a front-page story in their Sunday magazine on the Lost Boy Who Couldn't (pass the Atlanta Police Academy basic training test), I assumed that this story on li'l "Dasani" had to have something to do with Mandela. I mean, in all my years of reading and criticizing the NYT, never repeat NEVER have I seen a feature story take up a full 55% or more of the Monday front page.

But then, this is the New York Times we're talking about: Chutzpah is the name of the game for these vermin.

"Girl in the Shadows" is part of a two-part series that the New York Times has the balls to subtitle as "Invisible Child," apparently without a hint of irony or even the tiniest bit of self-awareness of how stupid and disingenuous that makes them sound, after the "Kony 2012" Invisible Children campaign kind of cued everyone with a heartbeat to the racket that is the SWPL slobbering over dysfunctional, assisted African children far and wide.

Even South Park did an episode on disgraced "Invisible Children" idiot Jason Russell; maybe they should do a similar show on the New York Times' Andrea Elliot's "Invisible Child" campaign, because this sickening ghetto sympathiser really takes the cake.

From Elliot's mega-article, which tells the story of criminal heroin addicts "Chanel" and "Supreme," and their EIGHT children living in a homeless shelter for famblies in Brooklyn :
"Suddenly, Supreme leaps into the air. His monthly benefits have arrived, announced by a recording on his prepaid welfare phone. He sets off to reclaim his gold teeth from the pawnshop and buy new boots for the children at Cookie’s, a favored discount store in Fulton Mall. The money will be gone by week’s end.
Supreme and Chanel have been scolded about their lack of financial discipline in countless meetings with the city agencies that monitor the family.
But when that monthly check arrives, Supreme and Chanel do not think about abstractions like “responsibility” and “self-reliance.” They lose themselves in the delirium that a round of ice creams brings. They feel the sudden, exquisite release born of wearing those gold fronts again — of appearing like a person who has rather than a person who lacks." 

Here, it's like the vermin at the NYT are saying: "how dare you judge these poor black welfare recipients with their gold teeth, you shitty, hateful white privilege person? We at the NYT are so down with the ghetto folk, that we keeping it real. And we don't care what you think."

In a sane society, the national newspaper of record would be questioning the wisdom of public policy encouraging at worst, and not preventing at best - a pair of junky criminals breeding eight children that they cannot care for. 

The whole thing becomes even a lot more obvious toward the end of Elliot's article. Her and the seething hatred for white people is barely concealed when a few lines from the end of this epic-long article, Ellito writes this :
" They turn north on Carlton Avenue, passing a renovated brick townhouse with sleek, metal window frames.
A skinny brunette is unloading her station wagon. At the sight of Dasani’s family, she freezes. She smiles nervously and moves slowly to her car, grabbing an infant from the car seat.
The mood shifts.
“She thinks we gonna jump her,” Chanel says as she keeps walking. The shelter is only three blocks away.
“Why do they feel like they’re so apart? She’s just two steps away from us. If you got jumped out here, a black man would be the first to save your ass. That’s what I feel like telling her.”
When they reach Myrtle Avenue, Chanel goes searching for a beer at her favorite corner store. Dasani trails her. " 

"A skinny brunette"? This is how the vermin at the New York Times refers to a young white woman in the gentryfying ghetto?

Everyone reading this needs to contact Times communist Andrea Elliot and tell her what you  think.

A most repulsive video BTW of DWL Andrea Elliot interacting with her beloved ghetto pets can be seen among many other related NYT documents here.

The New York Times: Now That Silly Billy Is ABout To Take Over, The Vermin Of 42nd Street Are Turning Up The Contrived "Social Justice" Rhetoric.




 

Saturday, December 7, 2013

New York Times Covers From Past Few Days Not Posted As A Result Of Perfect Apathy On The Part Of The COTT Blog Administrator In Charge (Shame On Her)

5DecemberMMXIII


26 November MMXIII 


Friday November 29 MMXIII


Monday 2 December MMXIII 

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Nelson Mandela Deat At 95: As Expected, The New York Times Goes Into Full-On Hagiography Worship Mode, Never Missing An Opportunity To Comfort The Afflicted (SA Blacks), And Afflict The Comfortable (SA Whites)...

Wednesday 4 Decembr MMXIII
Well ole' Madiba has finally bit the dust, at the ripe old toothless age of ninety-five.

Ninety five?

For a number of reasons both nature and nurture-related, Africans have a shorter lifespan than non-Africans. For inner-city African American males, this lifespan is even shorter still. In the same way that a domesticated dog has a life expectancy measured relative to its master's by a factor of about 8:1 (depending on  the breed), certain ethnic groups live longer than others.

A case in point is the Greek island of Ikaria, which the vermin at the New York Times reported on in an October 2012 article entitled: "The Island Where People Forget To Die." Apparently the majority of Ikaria's islanders live into their hundreds.

Bur we digress...

Nelson Mandela is finally dead, and the New York Times has begun to buff the halo over their pointy head by heaping on the man-love.

In the coming weeks, you are going to see and hear the name "Nelson Mandela" more than you ever have in the past 25 years. And a lot of what you hear and read is going to sound like this (from today's NYT Mandela obit by Times big-wig Bill Keller entitled "Nelson Mandela, South Africa's Liberator As Prisoner And President, Dies at 95") :

"Some" whites emigrated Bill? You lying little weasel. You competitive compassionate, pathological altruist, beta anti-white conformist scum.

How bout fully 25% of white South Africans have fled since 1994? Not to mention the 3,500 white farmers killed by marauding gangs of black males in that same period; not to mention the hundreds of baby-rapes reported every day; not to mention the criminal rape epidemic where fully one-third of ALL black south African males actually Admit to having committed violent raped ; not to mention the two rhinos slaughtered on average every single day in SA by negro poachers who sell the poor beasts' tusks to grinning Chinamen who believe - to the one all of them - that the ground tusk potion will give them some kind of sick, perverted sexual stamina ; not to mention the billions in foreign aid especially from the US (George GW's perpfar program : 60 billion dollars), and when not from the US then from other European and only European countries.

Neslon Mandela was an evil man, and not even probably by his own doing. Nelson Mandela was a vital cog in a giant machinery that for over 100 years and more specifically since May 1945, has gradually grinded down the very system that made Europe great and her world-wide colonies possible.

The best thing that ever happened to the cargo-cult societies of the entire non-Western World was contact with the White, Western World. From the Philippines to Mozambique, non-Euro peoples' interaction with whites even as colonial subjects, was from a meta point of view a net gain for those colonized.

By colonizing the world, white Europeans spread the technology and medical know-how that allowed non-European nations - heavily subsidized by guilt payments too in the form of "foreign Aid" - to absolutely EXPLODE in numbers. In the tiny nation of Cambodia there are over 60 "deliveries" every day, and these JUST in the facilities of one single private Catholic charity.

It cannot be emphasized enough: since the end of WW2, White Western interventionism in the turd world has resulted in scores of "underdeveloped" nations being enabled to produce scores of "underdeveloped" children. White technology, white guilt and white do-gooderism are the main ingredients behind the tectonic shift in global demographics that have occurred in just two short generations:

While in 1950 the world was approximately 33% white and overall less than 8% african, today those figures are the same but reversed. In other words: today euros make up less than 8% of all global population, while africans are the proud possessors of 33% of all humankind's roll call.

In 2010 the afro-mometer rolled over the One Billion mark on the dial, every single last one of these afros being the direct product of Western intervention through medical technology and food aid, in their impoverished, pre-Stone Age lands. George W. Bush with his PEPFAR program spent over 60 billion dollars to eradicate AIDS on the Dark Continent. How has this benefited the planet? Answer: by producing hundreds of millions of new, future AIDS patients.

The simple fact of the matter is that South Africa would be a lot better off today under European control, as would the rest of the formerly-colonized "Developing" (lol) ."World".

So please main stream media types: enough about your Saint Mandela. Let's get just a little cynical, and a little realistic, about what is really going on. Cuz it ain't perty, and it can't possibly end well.

*sigh*

The New York Times: Pretending To Be Anti-Racist Hipsters While They Are In Actuality Genocidal Racist Freaks, Since 1984









Monday, December 2, 2013

Why Has The New York Times Become Such A Seething Cauldron Of Racist Hatred For "Ordinary" Americans, and "Ordinary" Westerners Everywhere?

It oozes beneath the black newsprint of absolutely every single word of practically every article published in the New York Times these days : a deep-seated racist hatred for ordinary whites wherever they may be on the planet.

An article on London's Heathrow airport planned expansion gives us this accompanying photograph :



I too had to look twice. This is a photograph that illustrates an article about the biggest airport in England I asked myself?

(Source article : "Expansion Plans For Heathrow Airport Are Grounded For Now")

Yes, of course if you look closely, you will see that the white English children have not been completely airbrushed out of the picture : they are, in fact, and fittingly, at the back of the line, behind their dark-skinned south-east asian future overlords. The British kids share a quizzical expression on their pale faces as if to say : "Wait a minute, we're getting genocide-replaced out of this, too?"

.../...

The New York Times is becoming more radical and more evil with every new print issue foisted upon the newsstands, and at great financial loss to the Sulzberger Empire.

It's almost as though they sense the jig is almost up, and are therefore turning up the dial to "11" and beyond in a desperate last cynical fit of nihilistic ethnic hatred.

Why do the sneering journos at the NYT hate ordinary Euros so much?

Anybody? Anyone? (did I see a hand go up in the back of the room?).

In the year 2013, why does the New York Times feel the need to side with criminal ghetto underlife such as the murderous child-criminals portrayed in their front page above-the-fold feature story published today Monday December 2nd, a certain "John D. Bunn," who in 1991 was convicted at the age of 14 of murdering a Rikers Island corrections officer, along with a fellow ghetto accomplice, a one "Rosean Hardgrave," who remains incarcerated.

"For 22 Years, Caught In A Murder Case's Tangled Web", by Times' communist Frances Robles.

The Object Of A Front-Page NYT Sympathy Puff Piece:
Trigger ... Person : John Bunn
This is one of those really-long NYT feature articles - it goes on for a full six pages on NYT.com, and takes up not only a large ATF section of today's front page (the most expensive publishing real estate on planet earth), complete with picture, the article drones on and on for another full page and a half in the National section of today's print edition.

Bunn's Alleged Co-Triggerman,
Murder Convict Rosean Hardgrave 
Here is what is especially funny about this article : the NYT journalist behind it (Frances Robles) practically admits that Bunn and Hardgrave were criminal surplus welfare public housing project scum long before they were fingered by a now-retired NYT super-detective, Louis Scaracella, upon whom the Times along with their communist brethren at the "Innocence Project" have spent considerable energy besmirching over the course of the past year and a half.

Ex NYPD Detective Louis Scarcella: A Made-In-Heaven
Scapegoat For NYT Holy Rollering Minority Uplift 
(A few of the low-blows flung at Detective Scarcella by the vermin at the Times can be seen here.)

If you read "For 22 Years" in its entirety and I hope to God you have better things to do, you will be shocked at how close the Times reporter, this communist Robles, comes to unravelling the deep truth, while always being pulled back as though by the force of an invisible bungee cord, back up high into the lofty oxygen-free place where equalist extreme left-wing dogma prevails. That wishful thinking place in the oxygen-free upper-atmosphere where minorities in general and negroes especially can Do No Wrong.

For example, in his article Robles acknowledges that :

- even at only 14 years old, Bunn had already committed (read: been caught for) many violent crimes ;
- Bunn and Hardgrave enjoyed stealing cars and "joy-riding" in stolen vehicles ;
- Hardgrave, who at 17 was three years older than Bunn at the time of the 1991 murder, was an increasingly violent offender, on a "collision course" said a police source referred to in the article;
- Bunn himself admits that, since being paroled in 2006, he longs for the "order" and the "comfort" of life behind bars.

In case you think I'm kidding about this last part, from the article :
"Mr. Bunn was turned down for parole three times and was released in 2006. However, he failed to report in properly, violating his parole, and was sent back upstate for a year. He was released a second time in 2009.

He is bald with sad eyes now, and a small frame. He drove a reporter around his neighborhood in a borrowed Jaguar and stopped at the crime scene. He pointed out the nearby Granville T. Woods Elementary School in Crown Heights, which he and Mr. Hargrave had attended, though three years apart. He described how Mr. Hargrave would protect his smaller friend from bullies but gave him the occasional wedgie, too. 
Mr. Bunn is still angry with his lawyers. He struggles with anxiety and finds he actually misses the structure of life behind bars. It was there that he learned to read. He works as an assistant to a rap group, and when the group he works for went on tour to Japan this summer, his parole prevented him from going. 
“They pulled the rug out from under us by destroying the DNA that would have proved we were innocent,” he said, making no effort to stop the tears running down his cheeks as he sat at an Applebee’s in Downtown Brooklyn. “Then everybody gave up on us.” 
The Exoneration Initiative, a nonprofit organization in Manhattan that has been investigating the case for two years, now represents Mr. Bunn. “This smacks of a cover-up, and it’s really troubling,” said Mr. Bunn’s lawyer, Glenn A. Garber."
How is it possible for the New York Times to take things to such an outrageous level, you may ask?

How is it possible that Amerika's newspaper of Record consistently reports that Up is Down, that Down is Up, that White is Black, Cold is Hot, Love is Death and Death is Life?

In this ATF (above the fold) front page shocker today, the NYT's Frances Robles all but admits that even if these two ghetto thugs were not really guilty of the 1991 murder they were (wrongly says the NYT) convicted for, that they most likely would have gone on to commit other violent crimes and very likely murder.

The NYT seems to rejoice in defending these worthless, vile, sickening criminal monsters, no matter how sad it is that they are thus.

Do I feel sorry for a cockroach because it was not born a butterfly? For a vulture because it was denied the right to be born an eagle?

The New York Times abhors nature. The NYT despises life itself, for they want to make changes that only a superior entity is capable of.

.../...

Here's COTT's humble take on why the vermin at the NYT are upping the auntee on these so-called innocence project cases: the syphillitic reality-reversers at Amerika's newspaper of record are so pumped full of hubris, right now that their pet omega-male-married-to-a-negro lesbian is going to be the new David Dinkins in whiteface in the mayor's mansion, that they realize that they are going to get what they have been clamoring for all along: namely a screeching halt to the Stop and Frisk policies that they hated so much and smeared whenever they could in their (Charles Blow) Op-Ed editorials,  even though S&F slashed the number of (mostly minority) gun murders in the city astronomically, and even though S&F was widely praised even by black preachers as a good way to keep the lid on violent ghetto criminality.

So what is going to happen is that minority criminality will once again skyrocket in the Big Apple, and the freakazoids at Amerika's newspaper of record will be able to claim Victory.

.../...

In a sane society, a nation's newspaper of record would be drawing logical and clear-headed conclusions about the class and (gasp!) racial nature of certain forms of criminality, especially the kinds of extreme violent criminality depicted in this sad article. In post-WW2 America however, political correction as defined by the vermin at the New York Times dictates that "There Is No Race There Is Only One Race, And Equality Is His Prophet. Peace Be Upon Him."

The vermin at the Times are are going to regret what they wished for.

The New York Times: Verminous Since Sunday Brunch And Soon That Too Will Be Outlawed