Her name is Rachel Jeantel, she was Martin's friend, she was on the sail phone with him minutes before he was shot (after sucker-punching GW), and, according to an NBC commentator, she is not the "sharpest tool in the shed."
That "sharpest tool" statement was probably an oops by the NBC woman journo, and probably won't be repeated, even though many of the comments in the buzz feeds all over the internet are wondering if Jeantel is not borderline retarded. (The NBC commentator qualified her "not the sharpest" statement with: "But she's no dummy").
When I first saw Jeantel testifying, I felt incredibly sorry for her, and even a little bad about being so pissed off about the whole Trayvon-ô-Mania affair.
She was big. She was obese really. She had the dazed, drooping, bloodshot eyes of some kind of poor depraved jungle creature. She listened to questions with her mighty lips slightly ajar; her big pink tongue occasionally darted out of her mouth and licked those big painted lips in what appeared to be an absolute and tragic absence of self-awareness. She moved her lips slightly as she read - ever so slowly - pages 18 through 23 of the deposition that GW's defense attorney placed before her on the witness stand and axed her to read. She used the word "ax" instead of "ask" over and over again. She bobbed her head between questioning, we had to look closely to see if she was wearing earbuds and maybe listening to some music.
She was not.
In a word, Jeantel introduced - O.J. style - tens of millions of ordinary Americans into the very finite brain power of average ghetto blacks in the USA. Except that ordinary Americans never identified OJ Simpson with ghetto blackness; in this case, they will.
Today's testimony was for HBD Realism like an entire season of "The First 48" on steroids. (I loved BTW that the controversial Cheerios commercial aired a few times between non-stop coverage on CNN).
The New York Times of course had no choice but to report on this mega-trial. Remember: as first disclosed on this blog over a year ago, the verminous reality contortionists at the New York Times, for the first time in their 162-year history, used the term "White Hispanic" to describe Zimmerman shortly after he was re-arrested, 44 days after the shooting.
Perhaps realizing how incredibly biased that looked, and how obvious it made it that the vermin at the Times were praying that Zimmerman would be white(r), the New York Times never again used the term "White Hispanic." Go to nyts.com and search it for yourself.
They have toned it down a bit. But like Nancy Grace and 95% of the rest of the MSM, the NYT are clearly on the side of Trayvon Martin and his fambly. Today they published yet another propaganda puff piece that confirms this: "At Zimmerman Trial, A Tail Of Pursuit And Attack."
"A tail of pursuit and attack"?
As in: "Zimmerman pursued and attacked. Profiled"?
Really. The swine. How dare they. For in a sane society, the top headline would have read something more like: "Star prosecution witness in TM trial caught red-handing lying; witness might be mentally incompetent to testify further."
Instead, we get this from today's NYT article :
Note the way that the pro-Trayvon fanatics at the Times attempt here to project their authenticity, by printing the actual ebonics of witness Jeantel's stataments. As in: "See? We get real with the realness of the African American scene too, nomesane?". But everywhere else, they portray the bordeline- retard Jeantel as just an everyday, ordinary American. Just like and as average as you and me.
We will of course be watching this case closely, with a keen eye on the lies of the NYT.
The New York Times: Charles Blow Said Trayvon Martin Was Innocent, That's All