We at COTT have nothing against gays - in fact, the idea of a 1930s-style, well-dressed, discrete dandy-type gay seems almost quaint to us.
But this ? :
What is wrong with these people, people? What awful affliction of the brain has taken over the pointy-headed elites with thick eyeglass lenses at Amerika's newspaper of record, an affliction that deludes them into believing (or pretending to believe) that celebrating such a sick, radical departure from all things traditional as this is something that is morally resplendent for society at large?
I want to destroy the New York Times, I really do. Every day in their jaded pages it is the same thing, over and over: uplift the minorities; portray the turd world as a place progressing despite evil Western oppression and the legacy of Western achievement (oppression); attack the Catholic church; defend Islam; write glowing, breathless articles about high-achieving illegal browns, and if said aliens are gay, make it a full-page spread; make white people look bad (unless they are gay, retarded, or both); never, ever publish a story or show a picture of a normal white hetero couple with kids, especially if they are thriving and God-forbid attractive; and so on ad infinitum.
Consider this front-page below the fold picture on today's national edition :
For the sick, demented individuals at the Times, shoving the anti-western perversity that is legalized and indeed state-sponsored sodomy is not enough. No! The times has to really rub it in by giving us the double progressive whammy of state-sponsored, miscegenated sodomy :
Above we have, respectively: an hispanic lesbian police officer with a negro carpet muncher (probably a government employee as well); a white homo with a negro butt buddy, and the negro's daughter on the white homo's shoulders (consider the symbolism there), and finally, below: we have a low-down negro (in dress) with his own butt buddy, a dimunitive hispanic.
The New York Times: making white people look like fags since 2001.