Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Friday, June 26, 2015

Charleston And Jewish Media Power : Turn The New York Times Blue

Dylann Storm Rawf was manna from heaven for the hateful little eunuchs at the New York Times.

The Charleston shooting has been above-the-fold front-page banner news for over a solid week at Amerika's newspaper of record ; the Sinister Ones of 42nd Street have had a wish come true.  And their glee is not likely to subside anytime soon.

The Charleston Bible Study Massacre has proven beyond a reasonable doubt how virulently anti-white the status-whoring good-think danger-scum at the New York Times truly are.
Mercifully, we are starting to see ordinary white Americans waking up to the exact same Jewish Media Power bullshit that made Rawf snap ; he evoked it in his naive but-not-unintelligently-written "manifesto," which along with select parts of the rest of it has been used by the vermin at the New York Times to stoke the flames of racial animosity in the U.S., and beyond, since last Wednesday, a great, repeat GREAT day in the annals of the civilization-wreckers at the NYT. 

Down-home low-level white resentment at Jewish media power caused the Charleston Bible Study Massacre. Make no mistake: this was a crime that has Eskimo fingerprints all over it. 

From the Chateau : 

U.S. agencies still collect crime data by race. That will end soon, because the data is unfriendly to the Equalist Narrative and is falling into the hands of the Rebel Alliance. For now, a rich trove of anti-antiracism Realtalk is yours for the hatebrowsing at various government websites.
From the 2013 FBI Crime Report:
Although blacks only constitute 12% of the total US population, they murder nearly as many whites as the number of whites murdered by other whites, who are 64% of the total US population.
This website is running a tally of black-on-white and white-on-black murders in the year 2014. The numbers currently stand at 348 BoW murders to 4 WoB murders.
But in fact, white-on-black crime is a statistical rarity. According to data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), an estimated 320,082 whites were victims of black violence in 2010, while 62,593 blacks were victims of white violence. That same year, according to the Census Bureau, the white and black populations in the U.S. were 196,817,552 and 37,685,848, respectively. Whites therefore committed acts of interracial violence at a rate of 32 per 100,000, while the black rate was 849 per 100,000. In other words, the “average” black was statistically 26.5 times more likely to commit criminal violence against a white, than vice versa. Moreover, blacks who committed violent crimes chose white victims 47.7% of the time, whereas whites who committed violent crimes targeted black victims only 3.9% of the time.
FBI stats show that blacks are 50 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites than vice versa.
John Derbyshire combs National Crime Victimization Survey data and does the math, finding that any given black was almost fifteen times more likely to have killed a white in 2013 than any given white was to have killed a black.
Derbyshire also responds to slithery reptilian leftoid critics who claim that the disproportionate black-on-white crime rates are simply a consequence of population ratios and nothing else.
The argument here is that blacks move among whites much more than whites move among blacks. We encounter blacks much less frequently than they encounter us, so of course we commit fewer crimes against them! If we moved among blacks more, we’d commit more crimes against them!
Er, possibly: but wouldn’t they also commit more crimes against us? And are we sure that the whites who avoid moving among blacks (why?) are just as criminally inclined as those who mingle?
Derb goes on to explain the math underlying the disparate black-on-white crime stats. Short story: Tim Wise can’t do math. But he sure can do sophistry, that rascally bloodsucker!
The arid “population ratio” argument against the idea of blacks deliberately targeting whites in racial antagonism crimes strikes me as specious for another reason. How often do upstanding members of the criminal class of blacks encounter whites in real life? Blacks are fairly concentrated in their rural and urban enclaves. (Even middle class suburban blacks tend to live in majority black neighborhoods.) For a benign “population ratio” argument to have any merit, you’d need to have conditions on the ground that greatly increased the actual encounter rate between blacks and whites. The crude population ratio number doesn’t accurately reflect the real world daily encounter rate between the races.
This is damning, because if the black-white encounter rate based on nothing but raw population ratio is much lower in actuality, it means the higher rate of black-on-white violence is even more shockingly disproportionate. It means black criminals are sometimes going out of their way to hunt for white prey, away from their monoracial districts.
Pussy cuckservatives often crouch into the defensive posture when the topic is black crime, reflexively bleating about “blacks killing other blacks, that’s the real problem”, preferring to ignore the low level race war of black-on-white violence. Yes, blacks kill other blacks far more prodigiously than they kill whites, but that skew is mostly a function of target availability and racial disposition toward impulsiveness; the great majority of liberal SWPL whites are smart enough to avoid living in the thick of the urban (and rural) ghettos, and to limit their exposure to black criminal predation. Even within city boundaries that have dense black populations, whites (and hispanics) sequester themselves into city sectors that are psychologically and economically, if not geographically, distant from the core black urban crimeclass.
It’s no secret that criminals prefer soft targets. If you walk a certain way, (i.e., like an alpha male), you can reduce the chance that you’ll be the target of street crime. It is likely the case that black criminals perceive the supple SWPL whites who live within prowling distance of them as soft, juicy targets of opportunity, made more inviting as hated prey objects by the whiteness of their appearance. Once a doughy white is in the black’s crosshairs, the racial hate instinct percolates from the subconscious into consciousness, often driving the attacker to a frenzy of depraved, intertribe violence. This is why it’s wrong to assume only premeditated interracial violence is classifiable as racially motivated hate crime; race hate does not abide exquisitely legalistic timelines. Hatred for racial outsiders can simmer for years or it can explode on sight in the heat of the moment.
Smartly, most whites have the good sense to segregate themselves from blacks, establishing themselves in “dindu buffer zones” that are geographic, technological, or economic in nature. It is what whites do, and especially what GoodWhite liberals do, (whether or not they admit to it), to provide themselves a measure of protection from the wildly disproportionate chaos and feral race hatred of black criminality.
So, yes, there’s a guerrilla race war happening in this country. It just isn’t the one you’ll hear about ad nauseam by our media, corporate, government, and academia Hivemind gatekeepers of information. They prefer you stay ignorant, self-flagellating, powerless, and victimized for the Great Globo-Equalist Cause.
A part of me hates writing posts like this one, as it really kills my chill vibe, but some lies are so dangerous and, worse, so humiliating to good people that I’m roused to action from my poolside lounge. And that is the worst crime of all.


Anonymous said...

"Smartly, most whites have the good sense to segregate themselves from blacks, establishing themselves in “dindu buffer zones” that are geographic, technological, or economic in nature."

That's right but "our" US government is taking care of that with its Housing and Urban Development Admin by Section 8 (free housing)in White neighborhoods.

Anonymous said...

Hi Artur:

I wanted to reproduce an excerpt I sent in an email to one of the activist/speakers at an upcoming conference this fall that I hope you and your readers can make so that we can finally meet w/ our brethren and sisters in this fight (link w/ the details follows):

"Thanks for your response. Please don't come across as sounding defeated and demoralized. My biggest fear would be realized. I want you to also check out the blog called "Crimes of the Times" hosted by an intellectual who has spent years single-handedly picking apart the naked hatred of our people/culture and worship of Blacks/immigrants by the "New York Times." I blog there on occasion when time permits so as to remind him of his importance in brilliantly chronicling the Jew York Times' crimes against OUR people (and to remind him he's not alone), but I intend to invite him to the conference if he can make it. I want to meet all of my fellow activists whom I so greatly admire and slave away against formidable, overwhelming odds. Mike King, a historical revisionist, is another activist I try to financially support and want to invite. I'd also love to see historical revisionist Michael Hoffman attend."

Please come ALL if you can. Hell... you should be one of the featured speakers. Thanks for ALL that you do, Artur!