Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's Newspaper of Record

Exposing the Criminal Liberal Bias of America's
Newspaper of Record

Friday, May 4, 2012

On The Anniversary Of Its Phallic-Faced Leader's Assassination, The NYT Puts A Positive Spin On Al Qeada

Fri4MayMMXII - Clk2Enlrg
It is a general rule of journalistic form to conclude an article with a quote, usually from a person who is either referred to in the article or who is making relevant commentary. More often than not, the sentiment expressed in that closing quote summarizes the journalist's own feelings about the article's contents.

And so we have another fluffy propaganda puff piece published today in the most expensive print real estate on the planet, entitled "Recovered Bin Laden Letters Show A Divided Al Queada," penned by Times communist and civilization-destroying eunuch Peter Baker.

In furtherance of the Obama administration's own attempts to capitalize on the anniversary of Bin Laden's (alleged) assassination, "Recovered" tells the story of the reams of documents and letters that were found in the phallic-faced terrorist's Paki hovel.

What I find curious is the way in which the spineless little earthworms  at Amerika's newspaper of record chose to close the article.

From the article :


By printing what is obviously a blatant, cynical expression of taqqya, the Times is essentially presenting this posture of mendaciousness as based in reality. Further, by referring to "Islamic law" as though such a thing exists, the Times is once again painting a veneer of holiness and legalistic legitimacy on what is in reality a Dark-Ages cult of primitive superstitions designed to cater to the jealous rage of primitive, misogynistic, nomadic unibrows.

That's how I see it, anyway.

*sigh*

The New York Times: Blasting The Catholic Church Every Day While Islam Gets A Pass

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I do not now believe nor have I ever believed that Osama bin Ladin was killed by the Seals. He died at Tora Bora in Dec 2001 buried in a cave by a daisy cutter. It just was not time for bin Ladin to die. The US government needed the War on Terror. The US had not got all of it's controls of the American people in place yet. When it became the right time for bin Ladin to die, well my goodness there he was right under the US's and everybody else's nose sitting there watching TV. What dayano? Everybody's been looking for this guy. Well the Seals will just have to pop in and kill him, then dump him where nobody can find him ever. Hail Hail the wicked man is dead. Long live Obama.

M.G. said...

Bonjour Artur,

Bad news from Fran├žarabia, our new president has arrived, a man whose pet project is to let foreigners vote. You can guess who they are and what they'll be voting for I'm sure...

One can hear car horns honking joyously, apparently we think we've just won the World Cup. How long will the honeymoon last?

Inching ever closer to Tours in 732 but with no Charles le Marteau in sight,

M.G.
Those Who Can See

rjp said...

He's one for you Auturo. You know if it has the word "racism" in the title it's going to be a humdinger of fantastical allegations.

Soldier Is Defeated by War Abroad, Then Welcomed Back by Racism
‘Home,’ a Novel by Toni Morrison

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/books/home-a-novel-by-toni-morrison.html

Anonymous said...

Tee hee. "Non-believers" are soooo assumed not to be human, that all they have to say is that it's not permitted to be deceptive, and of course, we'll all know they mean it for OHTER MUSLIMS, not for those non-human infidels.