The Devious Diversity Capos at the New York Times Try to Sneak One Past Us

Original Caption Reads: "Tuan N'Gai, left, and his partner,
Erin Kelly, recently moved to the Atlanta area from
 Washington, D.C." Now, What's Confusing About That?

As we have pointed out in previous posts, the crypto-delusional population replacement fanatics at the NYT are giddy with glee as the results of the 2010 Census continue to reveal the success of the  social engineering agenda initiated by crusading white liberals over the course of the past few decades. Almost half of all children in the country today are minorities (non-white). HALF! The disingenuous do-gooder altruism athletes at the Times are breaking out the alcohol-free champagne, because it is working:  their campaign to purge the nation of its hated indigenous population is on track to be fulfilled ahead of schedule.

In another Census-happy article published on the front page of today's national edition entitled "Many U.S. Blacks Moving to South, Reversing Trend," Times communists Sabrina Tavernise and Robert Gebeloff (big surprise there!) report with glee on the changing face of the nation: it is mercifully becoming  more diverse, more "inclusive," and more just, they say.

Translation: the Times' relentless campaign to foist diversity upon the nation and undo the traditional bedrock of Western Civilization is succeeding. Yee-hah !

We will surely see a lot more of this in the coming days. Here at COTT, nothing coming out of the pages of Amerika's newspaper of record shocks us any more.

Nevertheless, we felt it our duty to speak out on the incredibly dubious photo proudly reprinted on this blog without permission above. Please take a closer look at this photo that the Times in their infinite sneakiness tried to slip past us: it shows two black males people, who for the purposes of the article "U.S. Blacks Moving to South, Reversing Trend" are meant to symbolize the changing dynamic of the African American population in the United States. Upon closer inspection, one is forced to wonder whether the large, bespectacled, balding negro in the foreground is a male or a female of the species, given the very obvious cleavage and the nature of the article. And then, when one reads the caption: "Tuan N'Gai and his Partner Erin...," one is left even more confused: which one is the female in this apparent couple? Which one is Erin? Isn't "Erin" a female name?

The ambiguity is intentional, obviously. And the New York Times is a sick, sick, sick institution for trying to pull crap like this.

The New York Times: All The Crap That's Print To Fit Since 1987