(*As we have seen, a quick search of their records reveals that from 1851 on, the New York Times has never,
ever used the term "white hispanic," except until March 2012, when it became expedient in their ongoing campaign to frame the Trayvon Martin killing in the predictable narrative of poor oppressed black youth vs. evil racist white society at large.)
So it looks like Curtis Sliwa of Guardian Angels fame has jumped on the Trayvon-o-mania bandwagon, with full support from the rapacious reality reversers at Amerika's newspaper of record.
From today's Letters to the Editor:
This story just gets more and more preposterous, and predictably the verminous little eunuchs at the New York Times, instead of backing down and throwing a bone or two to the Gods of Reasonableness, plunge deeper and deeper into the cesspool of the make-believe black victimhood at the hands of evil oppressive racist white society, narrative.
The Zimmerman incident is what this is all about. It's about taking guns and gun permits away from private citizens so we cannot defend ourselves when black hoodlums come after us. A hoodlum by any other name is still a hoodlum.
ReplyDeleteThere is no doubt, if Zimmerman had not of had his weapon Zimmerman would be dead instead of the hoodlum Martin who attacked him.
The media covers for hoodlums by not reporting black's crimes against white. The media ignores facts about black crime, judges place gag orders on black crimes, so now all the media has to do is get stand your ground laws, castle laws, and concealed weapons permits taken away and whites have absolutely no way to defend themselves.
Police can't help you. They can only try to catch your killer. It's we the citizens who must stop the hoodlums when they come after us.
A million hoodlums are a lot of hoodlums. A hood is a hood is a hood.