I have wondered about that too. Why now? The facts have been known for years, as with many others, but the scandal never seemed to reach 'critical mass'. What other factor am I missing?
Do you folks read the "New York Times"? Good Lord, why? It is so bad I cannot think it is suitable for anything except to start a fire. If it was soft, toilet paper. It is a seriously horrible newspaper, sick, evil, brainless.
Of course, they published the Weinstein horror story. But, what does, ""one of their own"" mean? The NYT is owned by Jews, I understand, and Weinstein is a Jew. Is that what you mean by ""one of their own""? If so, that is stupid and suggestive of an anti-Semitic attitude.
Weinstein is a disgrace to the Jewish people, a deep disgrace. It is a shocking revelation.
I have wondered about that too. Why now? The facts have been known for years, as with many others, but the scandal never seemed to reach 'critical mass'. What other factor am I missing?
ReplyDeleteDo you folks read the "New York Times"? Good Lord, why? It is so bad I cannot think it is suitable for anything except to start a fire. If it was soft, toilet paper. It is a seriously horrible newspaper, sick, evil, brainless.
ReplyDeleteOf course, they published the Weinstein horror story. But, what does, ""one of their own"" mean? The NYT is owned by Jews, I understand, and Weinstein is a Jew. Is that what you mean by ""one of their own""? If so, that is stupid and suggestive of an anti-Semitic attitude.
Weinstein is a disgrace to the Jewish people, a deep disgrace. It is a shocking revelation.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
A. Kaplan
Weinstein is a normal jew. Jews are antiWhite.
ReplyDeleteGreat read thank yoou
ReplyDelete