 |
| 28DecMMXI - Clk 2 Enlrg |
"Navigating Love And Autism"
Again we see, that the only time the New York Times ever talks about White people on their front page, is when members of that detested majority are either sickly, gay, murderous, dead or dying.
Never mind the fact that ADD didn't exist 15 years ago, and that alcoholism wasn't always a "disease," these sick fuckers at America's newspaper of record are now trying to paint the picture of some nerdy couple's argument over whether or not to get a cat as some deep-probe social scientific analysis of the sickness that all high-intelligent white people are probably infected with.
You're gonna read this article and think: "Is this an article about game and nerds, or nerds and game?" (The part about how the hot but weird chick featured was dating a blue-eyed most-popular high school jock is so telling, that the Times couldn't tell the truth [namely: that hot girls will get top-quality males no matter their weirdness index]).
Also: check out today's front page: did the New York Times place a photo of a Stone-Age Somali rape victim ABOVE possible future US prez Mitt Romney on purpose?
Answer: check back on COTT tomorrow to find out.
Happy New Year. Back to regular programming soon. (promise)
2 comments:
check out today's front page: did the New York Times place a photo of a Stone-Age Somali rape victim ABOVE possible future US prez Mitt Romney on purpose?
yes
WHAT DID AFRICANS CREATE???
[ a mess..in USA.Haiti. and homeland africa]
The New York Times is horrible at covering autism, trivializing this horrible disability for the sake of its image. As an autistic on welfare, I get to speak on this.
In the article you featured, the individuals profiled are very high-functioning compared to most individuals on the spectrum. Most autistics are unemployed, even verbal ones, but the SJW media will never cover this side of the story. Visiting any autism support group makes this obvious. Report showing that most autistics are unemployed: http://drexel.edu/autisminstitute/research-projects/research/ResearchPrograminLifeCourseOutcomes/indicatorsreport/#sthash.31XId4lN.dpbs
Additionally, the New York Times falsely supports a book called Neurotribes (https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/neurotribes-by-steve-silberman.html) The book is so horribly structured, an average five year-old can write much better. Silberman claims that many scientists and engineers were autistic because they were "weird" and "talented". However, most STEM people actually have good social skills, though some could be eccentric and introverted, NOT the same thing. The mathematician John Nash was weird and talented for instance, but he had schizophrenia, which is very different from autism, but Silberman doesn't rule out this possibility.
Noted psychiatry professor James Harris, who grew up among famous figures in autism history, was critical of Silberman's portrayal of Autism research history, calling it sensationalist (https://corticalchauvinism.com/2016/08/01/james-harris-discusses-the-books-neurotribes-and-in-a-different-key/) The book also glorifies the "neurodiversity" movement, composed of autistics that don't want to work but claim that are speshul, many of them comparing themselves to famous geniuses, and just want to live on welfare.
He doesn't cover low-functioning autism at all whatsoever. This was the last article I ever read in the New York Times.
Post a Comment