tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6776540523791072162.post6377525144038455793..comments2024-02-21T02:23:58.922-08:00Comments on Crimes of The Times: More Front-Page Anti-White Hatred From The Twisted Civilization-Destroyers At The NYT (Back To Regular Programming Soon)Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6776540523791072162.post-9607889897617885462017-12-24T19:37:05.398-08:002017-12-24T19:37:05.398-08:00The New York Times is horrible at covering autism,...The New York Times is horrible at covering autism, trivializing this horrible disability for the sake of its image. As an autistic on welfare, I get to speak on this.<br /><br />In the article you featured, the individuals profiled are very high-functioning compared to most individuals on the spectrum. Most autistics are unemployed, even verbal ones, but the SJW media will never cover this side of the story. Visiting any autism support group makes this obvious. Report showing that most autistics are unemployed: http://drexel.edu/autisminstitute/research-projects/research/ResearchPrograminLifeCourseOutcomes/indicatorsreport/#sthash.31XId4lN.dpbs<br /><br />Additionally, the New York Times falsely supports a book called Neurotribes (https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/neurotribes-by-steve-silberman.html) The book is so horribly structured, an average five year-old can write much better. Silberman claims that many scientists and engineers were autistic because they were "weird" and "talented". However, most STEM people actually have good social skills, though some could be eccentric and introverted, NOT the same thing. The mathematician John Nash was weird and talented for instance, but he had schizophrenia, which is very different from autism, but Silberman doesn't rule out this possibility.<br /><br />Noted psychiatry professor James Harris, who grew up among famous figures in autism history, was critical of Silberman's portrayal of Autism research history, calling it sensationalist (https://corticalchauvinism.com/2016/08/01/james-harris-discusses-the-books-neurotribes-and-in-a-different-key/) The book also glorifies the "neurodiversity" movement, composed of autistics that don't want to work but claim that are speshul, many of them comparing themselves to famous geniuses, and just want to live on welfare.<br /><br />He doesn't cover low-functioning autism at all whatsoever. This was the last article I ever read in the New York Times.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6776540523791072162.post-65541196794776238392011-12-30T18:21:03.050-08:002011-12-30T18:21:03.050-08:00check out today's front page: did the New York...check out today's front page: did the New York Times place a photo of a Stone-Age Somali rape victim ABOVE possible future US prez Mitt Romney on purpose?<br />yes<br /><br />WHAT DID AFRICANS CREATE???<br />[ a mess..in USA.Haiti. and homeland africa]kevnoreply@blogger.com